Q113428 - BUG: Array-Style New Allocates Wrong Number of Objects

BUG: Array-Style New Allocates Wrong Number of Objects

Q113428

1.00 1.50 WINDOWS kbtool kbbuglist ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The information in this article applies to: - The Microsoft C/C++ Compiler (CL.EXE) included with: - Microsoft Visual C++ for Windows, versions 1.0 and 1.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- SYMPTOMS ======== Unexpected results may occur due to errors in the code generated by using any one of the following optimizations: /O2, /O1, /Og, /Oe, /Ol, or /Ox. This problem may be reproduced by using the C++ "new" operator to allocate memory for an array of objects, assuming that the following criteria are also satisfied: - A "default" constructor is explicitly supplied for the object class. - A destructor is not explicitly provided for the class. - A nonconstant expression is used for the array size in the "new" invocation. CAUSE ===== The optimizing compiler is generating incorrect code. This may be seen by creating a .COD listing file by adding /Fc to the compiler options. Depending on the optimization used, the code generated to call "new" will not be passed the correct value. RESOLUTION ========== Any of the following will correct this condition for the specific example provided below: - Use the fast (/f) compiler instead of the optimizing compiler. -or- - Disable the optimization for the duration of the function that calls the C++ "new" operator. -or- - Do not provide a default constructor for the class. -or- - Provide a destructor for the class. -or- - Use a constant expression for the array size (make "n" a "const" or supply an explicit value instead). STATUS ====== Microsoft has confirmed this to be a problem in the Microsoft products listed at the beginning of this article. We are researching this problem and will post new information here in the Microsoft Knowledge Base as it becomes available. MORE INFORMATION ================ Sample Code ----------- /* Compile options needed: /f- and /Ox Actually, any one of /O2, /O1, /Og, /Oe, /Ol, or /Ox will cause the problem. */ //--------------------------------------------------------- // Sample to demonstrate code generation problem //--------------------------------------------------------- #include <iostream.h> class AnyName { public: AnyName() { nTimesCalled++; }; static int nTimesCalled; }; int AnyName::nTimesCalled = 0; //--------------------------------------------------------- // main() calls 'new' to demonstrate the problem //--------------------------------------------------------- void main() { int n = 20; // Indicates the number of // objects to construct AnyName *pAnyName = new AnyName [n]; cout << "Results: " << endl << " Constructor was called " << AnyName::nTimesCalled << " times." << endl << " Constructor should have been called " << (n) << " times." << endl; if ( AnyName::nTimesCalled == (n) ) cout << " Constructor called correct number of times!" << endl << endl; else cout << " Constructor called incorrect number of times!" << endl << endl; } Additional reference words: 1.00 1.50 8.00 8.00c KBCategory: kbtool kbbuglist KBSubcategory: CPPIss

Keywords : kb16bitonly
Issue type : kbbug
Technology : kbVCsearch kbAudDeveloper kbCVCComp