SET FILTER TO Does Not Move Record Pointer
Article ID: 119899
Article Last Modified on 12/3/2003
APPLIES TO
- Microsoft Visual FoxPro 3.0 Standard Edition
- Microsoft FoxPro 2.0
- Microsoft FoxPro 2.6a Professional Edition for Macintosh
- Microsoft FoxPro 2.6 for SCO/UNIX
This article was previously published under Q119899
SUMMARY
Issuing a SET FILTER command does not move the record pointer, even if the
record is currently located on a record that does not meet the filter
condition. This is the expected behavior, as documented in the "Language
Reference" manual and online Help system:
The condition specified by SET FILTER isn't evaluated until the
record pointer is moved in the table/.DBF.
Additional query words: VFoxWin FoxUnix FoxMac FoxDos FoxWin 2.50 2.50a 2.50b incorrect
Keywords: KB119899