1 INFO-VAX	Wed, 25 Dec 2002	Volume 2002 : Issue 712       Contents:3 A NEW SOURCING FOR YOUR ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS NEEDS  Re: E-mailing pgm output- Re: How to configure discs om a Mylex DAC960?  Re: is VMS really easy to use? Re: is VMS really easy to use? Re: LCD monitor for VAX?& Re: Merry Christmas to all VMS'ers ...& Re: Merry Christmas to all VMS'ers ...1 Re: Of Galaxy, Infiniband and Distributed Caching ; searching for MS640-DA memory and a RF36 drive for 4000-100  Spamtrap Re: Spamtrap Re: UTC time in DCL  Re: vax6k.openecs.org rebirth  Re: vax6k.openecs.org rebirth  Re: vax6k.openecs.org rebirth  RE: vax6k.openecs.org rebirth  Re: vax6k.openecs.org rebirth  Re: vax6k.openecs.org rebirth 
 Re: VMS ISPs?   F ----------------------------------------------------------------------    Date: 25 Dec 2002 02:00:45 -0800! From: forum@icbuyer.com (ICBUYER) < Subject: A NEW SOURCING FOR YOUR ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS NEEDS= Message-ID: <240ba64d.0212250200.6d5ecf41@posting.google.com>   > Enter into the new era of electronic components industry while" becoming an http://www.icbuyer.com    D ICBUYER enables all the electronic components industry professionalsD to: diffuse inventories, offers and requests, to consult the largest> and up-to-date available electronic components data worldwide,E indexing the largest brands as well as millions of active and passive = components, semiconductors, integrated circuits, transistors, = memories, micro-processors, chips, condensators, resistances, - commutators, relays, connectors, and so on    D With more than 8.000 members, and more than de 20.000 visits per dayC on its site, ICBUYER makes it possible for its members to carry out ( several million dollars of transactions.  D ICBUYER has already 4 offices: PARIS, LOS ANGELES, LONDON and OSAKA.   ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 01:55:33 -0500 ( From: David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com>! Subject: Re: E-mailing pgm output , Message-ID: <3E095665.5050703@tsoft-inc.com>   Bradford J. Hamilton wrote:   p > In article <69d784c4.0212240802.4b3859cb@posting.google.com>, Jack.Trachtman@vmmc.org (Jack Trachtman) writes: > D >>We run all third party pkgs on our hosts, ie we can't modify them. >>L >>Occassionaly I get user requests to be able to automatically e-mail outputA >>form an app that can only either be put into a file or put into  >>a print que. >>I >>What tricks are people using to redirect this kind of output to e-mail?  >> >>Thanks >> > L > How about writing a batch job that traverses an output directory, e-mails M > output to the appropriate individual(s), deletes (or archives) the output,  8 > and re-submits itself to run every (say) five minutes? > H > I'm sure there will be other, more elegant solutions that will present > themselves shortly.  > Q > I realize that this is not strictly "re-direction of output", but you *did* say N > that the package could not be modified - if you were truly able to re-direct< > output, would that not be a modification of a package?	:-)    M As for re-directing output, if the application allows the user to specify an  H output filename, then the output could be placed anywhere with any name.  K However, whether an output file, or sent directly to a utility which would  O e-mail the data, my first question is how would the utility, or anything else,   know the target e-mail address?   Q Something I did recently, (but it was a modification to the application), was to  N output documents to parameterized directories, AND, added a record/line to an M INDEX file which included the target's e-mail address, fax #, and some other  O data.  Follow-on applications could use this data to e-mail, fax, or print the  	 document.   P Without some way of specifying who the e-mail is going to, I cannot see any way  to do what you want.    ? How about a 4th party add-on that does precisely what you want?    Dave   ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 12:53:29 +0200 @ From: Veli =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6rkk=F6?= <Veli.Korkko@kolumbus.fi>6 Subject: Re: How to configure discs om a Mylex DAC960?+ Message-ID: <3E098E29.C19F8ED1@kolumbus.fi>    Onno Welling wrote:  >  > Hello! > G > I have an Alphaserver 800 with a Mylex DAC960 SCSI controller. I have H > both internal and external discs in my Alphaserver. As I am setting upF > a new cluster (2 * Alphaserver 800, VMS 7.2-2) I need to reconfigureD > de discs on the Mylex controller. To achieve that, I use a utilityG > called RA200RCU and the graphical console. I want to have JBOD discs, 
 > no RAID. > H > I have a DRA0 device, and I want to make this DRA5. WITHOUT physicallyH > moving the disc to another slot, how do I do that? Is that possible at > all? >  > Any advise welcome,  > Onno.   E Not having complete picture of your intentions but check DR_BASE_UNIT  sysgen parameter. H Normally on controller the first unit is on VMS DRA0, second is DRA1 and so on.H If you have on one node five units (i.e. to VMS DRA0... DRA4) and on the
 other one,? i.e. DRA0, the only way to RENUMBER them is to use DR_UNIT_BASE  parameter. But I would4 set it to 10 on one node and to say 20 on the other.  F Remember that MYLEX can present EIGTH units to VMS so at least reserve
 that many E unit numbers and set therefore minimally the DR_BASE_UNIT to 0 on one  node and to 8 at the other. , But 10/20 sounds more elegant in my opinion.   _veli    ------------------------------  # Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 14:32:29 GMT " From:   VAXman-  @SendSpamHere.ORG' Subject: Re: is VMS really easy to use? 0 Message-ID: <00A18F81.03C1D007@SendSpamHere.ORG>  g In article <c5cf6e8.0212241446.4a3d9a4b@posting.google.com>, baby_p_nut@yahoo.com (Baby Peanut) writes: A >The more I learn about OpenVMS the more I see that the statement 0 >"OpenVMS is easier than UNIX" is just not true. > ! >I mean come on which is simpler:  > E >$ DELETE dev:[dir.subdir...]*.*;*,;*,;*,;*,;*,;*,;*,[dir]subdir.dir;  >  >or  >  >$ rm -r dir > E >Plus the much-touted help facility that only shows command names and = >arguments and never explains output.  "man ps" will tell you G >everything about what ps outputs but "help show sys" will not tell you  >what "LEF" is.   & **************************************& *  WARNING!  WARNING!  TROLL ALERT!  *& *                                    *& *  PLEASE!  DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS!  *& **************************************   --O VAXman- OpenVMS APE certification number: AAA-0001     VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)COM              5   "Well my son, life is like a beanstalk, isn't it?"     ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 13:41:23 -0400 ( From: JF Mezei <jfmezei@vl.videotron.ca>' Subject: Re: is VMS really easy to use? / Message-ID: <3E09EDC3.B7C97862@vl.videotron.ca>   ! VAXman-, @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote: ( > **************************************( > *  WARNING!  WARNING!  TROLL ALERT!  *( > *                                    *( > *  PLEASE!  DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS!  *( > **************************************  L Oh come one, wherte's your Christmas spirit ? Those poor trolls do need someS feeding now and then. The internet wouldn't be the internet if Trolls were extinct.   M As long as they are not declared a protected species, we can abuse them as we J wish. So keeping them just healthy enough to prevent them being declared a& endangerd species is to our advantage.   :-)    ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 08:44:58 -0600 / From: Clay M. Denton <denton@orison.dsserv.com> ! Subject: Re: LCD monitor for VAX? 8 Message-ID: <0sgj0vc3pvkmiq1c9sadr44ge57f14lmu5@4ax.com>  Y The DEC/Compaq/HP part # for the 3W3-VGA adapter is 29-32549-01.  There are also some LCD X monitors with BNC connectors on the back - I have a customer with an NEC 20" LCD monitor+ hooked up to a VAXstation 4000/90 directly.    Clay  O On Sun, 22 Dec 2002 16:56:07 -0500, "Stanley F. Quayle" <stan@stanq.com> wrote:   0 >On 20 Dec 2002 at 22:38, GWDVMS::MOELLER wrote:B >> Did anyone test LCD monitors for "sync on green" compatibility? > F >No, but I have a friend who is using a LCD monitor on his VAXstation 	 >4000/90.  > E >It's an ugly installation -- he has a 3W3 cable (VAX to BNC), 3 BNC  B >barrel connectors, and a BNC to 15-pin VGA cable (some other DEC  >part).  But it works... >  >--Stan Quayle >Quayle Consulting Inc.  >  >---------- D >Stanley F. Quayle, P.E. N8SQ  +1 614-868-1363  Fax: +1 614 868-16712 >8572 North Spring Ct. NW, Pickerington, OH  43147> >Preferred address:  stan@stanq.com       http://www.stanq.com >    ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 12:58:16 +0100 4 From: Didier Morandi <Didier.Morandi.nospam@Free.fr>/ Subject: Re: Merry Christmas to all VMS'ers ... & Message-ID: <3E099D57.F661CE5@Free.fr>   Thanks Bob,   ) Tou you too and to all the group as well. J Over here, it's merely Pippin Christmas due to the availability of the Two) Towers on the European Cinema screens :-)    D.   Bob Ceculski wrote:  > 3 > Merry Christmas ... hope you all get an alpha VMS 2 > system for Christmas!  any other brand or os and$ > Christmas will not be so merry ...   ------------------------------  # Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 14:42:46 GMT " From:   VAXman-  @SendSpamHere.ORG/ Subject: Re: Merry Christmas to all VMS'ers ... 0 Message-ID: <00A18F82.73780714@SendSpamHere.ORG>  ] In article <3E099D57.F661CE5@Free.fr>, Didier Morandi <Didier.Morandi.nospam@Free.fr> writes:  >Thanks Bob, > * >Tou you too and to all the group as well.K >Over here, it's merely Pippin Christmas due to the availability of the Two * >Towers on the European Cinema screens :-)  	 ?????????    --O VAXman- OpenVMS APE certification number: AAA-0001     VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)COM              5   "Well my son, life is like a beanstalk, isn't it?"     ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 04:25:10 -0500 * From: "Bill Todd" <billtodd@metrocast.net>: Subject: Re: Of Galaxy, Infiniband and Distributed Caching2 Message-ID: <XbucnYGGuNz05JSjXTWc2Q@metrocast.net>  8 "Rob Young" <young_r@encompasserve.org> wrote in message- news:5n776H2yH2Pp@eisner.encompasserve.org...  > B >         Recently we heard rumors of Galaxy not making its way toA >         Itanium.  This is either true or not, doesn't matter to  >         what might be... > C >         Looking at a few wrinkles that may make Galaxy less of an  >         advantage.  K Surely this cannot be the same Rob Young who not so long ago was trumpeting J the inevitable victory of ADMP (an acronym which HP's web site is not ableH to find, nor is Google in anything but French and German) over all other mere MP boxes?  E No matter, since the comment is the same regardless:  Galaxy/ADMP and L Infiniband are complementary technologies with virtually no overlap, so ADMP9 is worth exactly as much, or as little, as it always was.   J Something as low-latency and high-bandwidth as Infiniband is, as you note,J extremely attractive for things like distributed caches (or caching at theD storage device), but in no way helps a system dynamically reallocateK resources.  And IB is not fast enough to support anything but distressingly H NUMA distributed shared memory (why you think that 2 - 10 us. latency is@ comparable to EV7's 390 ns. worst-case latency in a 64-processorB configuration is not clear at all), so IB does not allow effectiveL connection of bunches of small SMP boxes into something equivalent to an EV7J mesh (though it does allow them to be connected into extremely interesting? solutions for problems which do not require the homogeneity and : inter-processor communication/shared memory speed of EV7).  H When memory and processors become too cheap to worry about, ADMP will beJ valueless.  Until then, it will have at least some value (though partially6 offset by being a more complex environment to manage).  9 By the way, at the moment IB appears to be heading toward I low-volume/high-price niche status very much like Itanic, which will help J keep large SMP/NUMA boxes competitive with clustered groups of smaller SMPJ boxes for a while yet even when the clustered solution can handle the load effectively.   - bill   ------------------------------  # Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 13:25:46 GMT . From: "news.pandora.be" <nieuws@bodymetals.be>D Subject: searching for MS640-DA memory and a RF36 drive for 4000-100; Message-ID: <uliO9.69604$Ti2.10227@afrodite.telenet-ops.be>    Hello,  D I'm trying to restore a vax 4000-100 to use it later as a web-serverJ for the hardware i'm looking for 8 or 16 memmory sticks 16Mb type MS640-DA and a harddrive type RF36    anny advice welcome   9 I'm from Belgium, you can contact me on vax@bodymetals.be   
 Best regards,  Patrick Cuypers    ps i have 16 x 4mb simms on spare   ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 08:28:23 -0800 # From: "Tom Linden" <tom@kednos.com>  Subject: Spamtrap 9 Message-ID: <CIEJLCMNHNNDLLOOGNJIMEOCGEAA.tom@kednos.com>   A Have a 6.2 alpha with Multinet 3.3 which I discovered was an Open B relay.  Funning thing is that even after killing smtp it continuedB and a SHO SYS would show jobs like <smpt-031> so in the end I justC should down Multinet, don't need it anyway.  Now it gets a bit more C interesting,  I was running a logging access-list on the router and B found a lot of traffic trying to access the 6.2 node, so I grabbedA the log ran an emacs macro and Voila! a list of ip's of spammers.   D Now I am not going to post the list since it would be an easy matterB for these folks to change their ips; however, if you want the listB (about 180 ip's) send me an email, and if I recognize your name, ID will send it to you.  What would be useful is, if someone could listC the domain names of these ip's it is a bit tedious to do it by hand 9 obviously; since, that is a lot harder to change than ip.   6 happy new year, gott nytt r, gutes neu jahr, bon anno --- & Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.: Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).A Version: 6.0.431 / Virus Database: 242 - Release Date: 12/17/2002    ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 11:57:45 -0500 ) From: "Neil Rieck" <n.rieck@sympatico.ca>  Subject: Re: Spamtrap 9 Message-ID: <eslO9.2893$%R6.152917@news20.bellglobal.com>   H The same thing happened to me while using TCPware 5.x and OpenVMS-7.2 onM Alpha. I found some cool (free) online tools to help me close the relay. I've ( posted those links at the following URL:  5 http://www3.sympatico.ca/n.rieck/links/stop-spam.html   
 Neil Rieck Kitchener/Waterloo/Cambridge,  Ontario, Canada.! http://www3.sympatico.ca/n.rieck/   . "Tom Linden" <tom@kednos.com> wrote in message3 news:CIEJLCMNHNNDLLOOGNJIMEOCGEAA.tom@kednos.com... C > Have a 6.2 alpha with Multinet 3.3 which I discovered was an Open D > relay.  Funning thing is that even after killing smtp it continuedD > and a SHO SYS would show jobs like <smpt-031> so in the end I justE > should down Multinet, don't need it anyway.  Now it gets a bit more E > interesting,  I was running a logging access-list on the router and D > found a lot of traffic trying to access the 6.2 node, so I grabbedC > the log ran an emacs macro and Voila! a list of ip's of spammers.  > F > Now I am not going to post the list since it would be an easy matterD > for these folks to change their ips; however, if you want the listD > (about 180 ip's) send me an email, and if I recognize your name, IF > will send it to you.  What would be useful is, if someone could listE > the domain names of these ip's it is a bit tedious to do it by hand ; > obviously; since, that is a lot harder to change than ip.  > 8 > happy new year, gott nytt r, gutes neu jahr, bon anno > --- ( > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.< > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).C > Version: 6.0.431 / Virus Database: 242 - Release Date: 12/17/2002  >    ------------------------------  # Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 15:28:54 GMT 1 From: Michael Austin <maustin@firstdbasource.com>  Subject: Re: UTC time in DCL2 Message-ID: <3E09CE90.4E095A8E@firstdbasource.com>   "Jerome H. Fine" wrote:  <snip>  9 > Although I used to use VMS a few years ago, I don't use 8 > VMS these days at all.  But I do seem to remember that6 > both the DATE and the TIME are internally kept via a6 > 64 bit clock of so many 100 nanoseconds since a date' > in 1800s - is that January 1st, 1858?  <snip>   17-Nov-1858  --   Regards,  6 Michael Austin            OpenVMS User since June 1984   ------------------------------    Date: 25 Dec 2002 01:54:33 -0700) From: Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> & Subject: Re: vax6k.openecs.org rebirth( Message-ID: <1bvg1io4vq.fsf@cs.nmsu.edu>  / bdc@world.std.com (Brian 'Jarai' Chase) writes:  > G > > Even if, technically, he could run it on a PC with an emulator, I'm C > > sure there's lots of pleasure in knowing your bytes are running F > > through some old transistors or something. Actually there probably< > > aren't any transistorised computers than can run Telnet, > > unfortunately. > H > Well, certainly non-microprocesor based systems like VAX 11/780, some L > of the PDP-11s, and the PDP-10s come to mind as being able to run services > like Telnet.  ? Though certainly all VAXes, and to the best of my knowledge all , PDP-10s and -11s used integrated circuits... --  < Joseph J. Pfeiffer, Jr., Ph.D.       Phone -- (505) 646-1605< Department of Computer Science       FAX   -- (505) 646-1002E New Mexico State University          http://www.cs.nmsu.edu/~pfeiffer M Southwestern NM Regional Science and Engr Fair:  http://www.nmsu.edu/~scifair    ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 00:34:25 +0000 / From: cbh@ieya.co.REMOVE_THIS.uk (Chris Hedley) & Subject: Re: vax6k.openecs.org rebirth) Message-ID: <heuaua.966.ln@teabag.cbhnet>   7 According to David J. Dachtera <djesys.nospam@fsi.net>: H > Actually, the VAX 7000 series was the "last of the line" for "big" VAX > machines.   C I thought that the VAX 7000 line was the penultimate, and the final A stab at big VAXiness was the VAX 10000... could be wrong, though!    Chris. --  O "If the world was an orange it would be like much too small, y'know?" Neil, '84 7   Currently playing: Sing-Sing - "The Joy Of Sing-Sing" N   http://www.chrishedley.com  My stuff, including genealogy, other things, etc   ------------------------------   Date: 25 Dec 2002 12:09:57 GMT' From: jason@dstc.edu.au (jason andrade) & Subject: Re: vax6k.openecs.org rebirth. Message-ID: <auc76l$pvj$1@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au>  ) Stuart Fuller <stufuller@usa.net> writes:    >Dave wrote:  H >Next to the last.  The VAX 7000 series (76xx, 77xx, 78xx) was the last.  K digressing a bit - was there ever a VAX10000 ?  i've got some documentation < here that talks about the Alpha 10000 boxes running OpenVMS.  J anyone know very much about these - did DEC sell many ?  what happened to  them ?     regards,   -jason   ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 08:12:04 -0500 ' From: "Main, Kerry" <Kerry.Main@hp.com> & Subject: RE: vax6k.openecs.org rebirthT Message-ID: <BE56C50EA024184DAF48F0B9A47F5CF4023D9AA0@kaoexc01.americas.cpqcorp.net>   Jason,  5 >>> digressing a bit - was there ever a VAX10000 ?<<<   H Yep, here is a good pointer for those type of questions: (scroll down to VAX's)7 http://www.openvms.compaq.com/openvms/supportchart.html    Regards   
 Kerry Main Senior Consultant  Hewlett-Packard (Canada) Co.! Consulting & Integration Services  Voice: 613-592-4660  Fax   : 613-591-4477 Email: kerryDOTmain@hpDOTcom-     (remove the DOT's and replace with "."'s)      -----Original Message-----1 From: jason andrade [mailto:jason@dstc.edu.au]=20  Sent: December 25, 2002 7:10 AM  To: Info-VAX@Mvb.Saic.Com & Subject: Re: vax6k.openecs.org rebirth    ) Stuart Fuller <stufuller@usa.net> writes:    >Dave wrote:  H >Next to the last.  The VAX 7000 series (76xx, 77xx, 78xx) was the last.  = digressing a bit - was there ever a VAX10000 ?  i've got some A documentation here that talks about the Alpha 10000 boxes running  OpenVMS.  F anyone know very much about these - did DEC sell many ?  what happened to=20  them ?     regards,   -jason   ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 08:29:57 -0800 ' From: pzachary <pzachary@sasquatch.com> & Subject: Re: vax6k.openecs.org rebirth, Message-ID: <3E09DD05.BA1C7CD@sasquatch.com>  E Of course, some of the early VAXen didn't use microprocessors, it was E all bitslice in fpga or equiv, my old -11/750 had the (one) processor 0 spread out over over a hundred 40-pin devices... \ F as for a "transistor" based computer (non IC based), perhaps the firstE pdp-8, but Telnet, I wonder if some of the later 18-bit designs might E manage, they have enough power, certianly more than my pdp-11/20 that # can run mini-UNIX.  Finding one....    Pacl_    Joe Pfeiffer wrote:  > 1 > bdc@world.std.com (Brian 'Jarai' Chase) writes:  > > I > > > Even if, technically, he could run it on a PC with an emulator, I'm E > > > sure there's lots of pleasure in knowing your bytes are running H > > > through some old transistors or something. Actually there probably> > > > aren't any transistorised computers than can run Telnet, > > > unfortunately. > > I > > Well, certainly non-microprocesor based systems like VAX 11/780, some N > > of the PDP-11s, and the PDP-10s come to mind as being able to run services > > like Telnet. > A > Though certainly all VAXes, and to the best of my knowledge all . > PDP-10s and -11s used integrated circuits... > --> > Joseph J. Pfeiffer, Jr., Ph.D.       Phone -- (505) 646-1605> > Department of Computer Science       FAX   -- (505) 646-1002G > New Mexico State University          http://www.cs.nmsu.edu/~pfeiffer O > Southwestern NM Regional Science and Engr Fair:  http://www.nmsu.edu/~scifair    ------------------------------    Date: 26 Dec 2002 00:35:46 +0800, From: Paul Repacholi <prep@prep.synonet.com>& Subject: Re: vax6k.openecs.org rebirth- Message-ID: <874r92dpjx.fsf@prep.synonet.com>   + Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> writes:   A > Though certainly all VAXes, and to the best of my knowledge all . > PDP-10s and -11s used integrated circuits...  8 ::looks at KA-10 board::one, two, three:: Nope, does not make the IC cut :)   BTW, Merry Xmas to all!    --  < Paul Repacholi                               1 Crescent Rd.,7 +61 (08) 9257-1001                           Kalamunda. @                                              West Australia 6076* comp.os.vms,- The Older, Grumpier Slashdot. Raw, Cooked or Well-done, it's all half baked.F EPIC, The Architecture of the future, always has been, always will be.   ------------------------------  + Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 11:40:47 -0700 (MST) " From: John Nebel <nebel@csdco.com> Subject: Re: VMS ISPs?G Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0212251134390.14330-100000@athena.csdco.com>   7 Yes, please see http://www.csdco.com/About/history.html   > VMS web sites - http://www.cdle.org/ and http://www.money.org/    ! On 24 Dec 2002, Bill Hobbs wrote:   G > My second regularly unscheduled poll of cov looking for ISPs that use  > VMS. >  > Last time (2000 Oct 13I > http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=8s78s9%24n9f%241%40nnrp1.deja.com) # > y'all came up with the following: D > (Used http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph/ to determine the OS and > http server) > / > http://www.dls.net/  Apache on NetBSD/OpenBSD A > DLS Internet acquired FSINet (www.fsi.net and had VMS) 2001 Aug # > VMS is mentioned among other OSs. 4 > Is the mailing list vms-isps@dls.net still active? > , > http://www.endor.com/  Purveyor on OpenVMS > Proud to be a VMS ISP! > Local to NH? >  > http://www.iah.com/ ! > Gone, domain name is available.  > * > http://www.infoave.net/  Apache on Tru64" > Could not find a mention of VMS.; > Are they an ISP or do they resell their services to ISPs? 9 > Stumbled onto web.infoave.net, which is OSU on OpenVMS.  > 9 > http://www.prodigy.net/  Netscape-Enterprise on unknown % > Used VMS in the past, any VMS left?  > @ > A German ISP using VMS was mentioned, but no URL was provided. > R > >From http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=39ED61F7.D4123BFC%40SMTP.DeltaTel.RU,# > possibly a Russian ISP using VMS?  > 6 > http://www.iaregistry.com/  Apache (Unix) on unknown@ > Domain registry that ran on VMS and Tru64, is this still true? >  > http://www.radiusvms.com > RADIUS on VMS, ISP software?# > Site does not respond, timed out.  > $ > The 2002 Dec 01 web server survey,A > http://www.netcraft.com/Survey/Reports/0212/, has the following  > selected counts: >   total   35,543,105 >   OSU          3,540C >   Purveyor       549  Purveyor runs on OSs other than VMS, right?  >   HTTPd-WASD     236H > Any other http servers for VMS?  Apache at 22,045,350, plus some otherH > entries with Apache in the name.  But it runs on other OSs, like Unix. > E > So Endor seems to be an all VMS ISP, DLS and InfoAve appear to have B > VMS servers among other OSs.  Anyone here actually a customer orC > employee of any of these ISPs?  Can a customer have their account F > services (web, e-mail, etc.) exclusively on VMS?  Can a customer get > to a $ prompt? > ) > Are there any other VMS ISPs out there?  >    ------------------------------   End of INFO-VAX 2002.712 ************************