1 INFO-VAX	Mon, 29 Jul 2002	Volume 2002 : Issue 414       Contents:) Re: controlling telnet / ftp login access ) Re: controlling telnet / ftp login access  HSG80 RAID5 Warning  Re: HSG80 RAID5 Warning 0 Re: IOS 12.1.14 and DECnet Phase IV vs V problem0 Re: IOS 12.1.14 and DECnet Phase IV vs V problem+ Re: Itanic2 - the cHumPaq spin continues... + Re: Itanic2 - the cHumPaq spin continues...  Re: Open Files0 Re: OpenVMS VAX Hobbyist Kit (Montagar Sold Out)0 Re: OpenVMS VAX Hobbyist Kit (Montagar Sold Out)0 Re: OpenVMS VAX Hobbyist Kit (Montagar Sold Out)# Re: PL/I Hobbyist kit now available # RE: PL/I Hobbyist kit now available 1 Re: Powerstorm 300 and Alpha PC 164 with OVMS 7.3 1 Re: Powerstorm 300 and Alpha PC 164 with OVMS 7.3 0 Re: Register an Hobbyist layered product license. Re: [OT] The Kursk Disaster and MS Windows :-). Re: [OT] The Kursk Disaster and MS Windows :-)  F ----------------------------------------------------------------------  # Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 22:42:05 GMT 1 From: "David J. Dachtera" <djesys.nospam@fsi.net> 2 Subject: Re: controlling telnet / ftp login access' Message-ID: <3D4477D3.7DEA2E4C@fsi.net>    "Chris G." wrote:  > D > Decnet is not configured (at this stage I can't see any reason for( > running Decnet on a standalone system)  G About the only reason is to set DECnet Phase-IV ('cuz it's easier) with E no lines/circuits enabled so you can "SET HOST 0" even when TCP/IP is F acting up. Also, sometimes when you TELNET in and try to shutdown, theE telnet session gets killed at the "Stopping all user processes" stage E and prevents the shutdown from completing. That seems to be less of a ( problem now than it had been in he past.  H My hobbyist Alpha here does not run DECnet at all, although the MicroVAX, does (artifact of an earlier configuration).   --   David J. Dachtera  dba DJE Systems  http://www.djesys.com/  ( Unofficial Affordable OpenVMS Home Page: http://www.djesys.com/vms/soho/    ------------------------------  # Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 01:25:16 GMT - From: "John E. Malmberg" <wb8tyw@qsl.network> 2 Subject: Re: controlling telnet / ftp login access* Message-ID: <3D449509.9080506@qsl.network>   David J. Dachtera wrote: > "Chris G." wrote:  > D >>Decnet is not configured (at this stage I can't see any reason for( >>running Decnet on a standalone system) > K > > About the only reason is to set DECnet Phase-IV ('cuz it's easier) with 3 > no lines/circuits enabled so you can "SET HOST 0"   F Decnet objects can be used to allow non-privileged accounts access to  privileged command files.   C There are a lot of interesting things that can be done with decnet  C objects.  I use them to start detached X-11 program, even when the   transport is TCP/IP.   -John  wb8tyw@qsl.network Personal Opinion Only    ------------------------------  # Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 01:01:47 GMT ! From: rob.buxton@wcc.spam.govt.nz  Subject: HSG80 RAID5 Warning% Message-ID: <3d4490f7.620554139@news>   	 Hi Folks,   F Actually got hit by the following on our SAN Connected to our NT BoxesF but I believe the same issue will be OS Independent and I'm sure there, may be a few folk out there that use HSG80s.  F If you're running an HSG80s based SAN, with RAID5 Arrays created underE ACS8.5 (or possibly earlier) and you've upgraded to ACS8.6 and you've D got Save Configuration on the RaidSet and you're running the largest8 Disks available, then you'll have the following problem.  = If a member of your RAID5 Set fails then you cannot get it to  Reconstruct.  F The size of the Save Configuration Data increased from 8.5 to 8.6. So,D if a Disk in your 8.5 RaidSet fails then the SpareSet or replacement@ disk is first evaluated for the Save Configuration Space. It nowF reserves the new larger amount but then considers the remaining volume8 too small for the existing RAID5 Set and doesn't use it.  E If you're not running the largest disks available then using a larger & disk will get you around the problem. C Otherwise, you should consider re-initialising the RAID Set without  Save Configuration.    Rob.   ------------------------------  # Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 02:27:16 GMT 1 From: "David J. Dachtera" <djesys.nospam@fsi.net>   Subject: Re: HSG80 RAID5 Warning' Message-ID: <3D44AC9D.9688C83F@fsi.net>   " rob.buxton@wcc.spam.govt.nz wrote: >  > Hi Folks,  > H > Actually got hit by the following on our SAN Connected to our NT BoxesH > but I believe the same issue will be OS Independent and I'm sure there. > may be a few folk out there that use HSG80s. > H > If you're running an HSG80s based SAN, with RAID5 Arrays created underG > ACS8.5 (or possibly earlier) and you've upgraded to ACS8.6 and you've F > got Save Configuration on the RaidSet and you're running the largest: > Disks available, then you'll have the following problem. > ? > If a member of your RAID5 Set fails then you cannot get it to  > Reconstruct. > H > The size of the Save Configuration Data increased from 8.5 to 8.6. So,F > if a Disk in your 8.5 RaidSet fails then the SpareSet or replacementB > disk is first evaluated for the Save Configuration Space. It nowH > reserves the new larger amount but then considers the remaining volume: > too small for the existing RAID5 Set and doesn't use it. > G > If you're not running the largest disks available then using a larger ' > disk will get you around the problem. E > Otherwise, you should consider re-initialising the RAID Set without  > Save Configuration.   F AFAIK, Save Configuration is not recommended for dual-redundant pairs, either.    --   David J. Dachtera  dba DJE Systems  http://www.djesys.com/  ( Unofficial Affordable OpenVMS Home Page: http://www.djesys.com/vms/soho/    ------------------------------  % Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 22:00:58 +0100  From: EdL <edl@euronet.nl>9 Subject: Re: IOS 12.1.14 and DECnet Phase IV vs V problem + Message-ID: <B96A1A1A.17D4C%edl@euronet.nl>   ? >>>> A problem has occurred after we updated a Cisco7500 router $ >>>> from IOS 12.1.7 to IOS 12.1.14. >>  I >> The router no longer appears to know about your cluster alias address. F >> It has been a very long time since I dealt with Phase IV DECnet but  >> let's try a few quick checks: >>  J >> On each node of the VAXCluster issue the command: mcr ncp sho exec char >>  J >> I'm interested in knowing what each node shows as its own address, whatA >> its Type is, and what address it defines as the cluster alias.  >>  I >> On the router, what is the result of the command: show decnet neighbor  >>  I >> On the Phase V client, what is the result of: mcr decnet_register show  >> node <cluster>  >>  - >> That should be enough to get started with.  >>   >> Mark Berryman >> Mark.Berryman@Mvb.Saic.Com  >  > ? > This weekend we are going downgrade the router to IOS 12.1.7. G > It seems that we sometimes (delayed) can connect to a Phase V cluster B > and sometimes it fails. Anyway, I will try the suggested checks. >  > At this moment thanks, Edwin    
 Following up:   F We have downgrade the router to IOS 12.1.7 and the problem disappears.- So it is indeed something in the IOS 12.1.14.   7 Does anyone has a workaround, because we need to IPSec.    Regards, Edwin   ------------------------------  # Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 04:45:32 GMT - From: Hansang Bae <hbae_@_nyc.rr.com.REMOVE_> 9 Subject: Re: IOS 12.1.14 and DECnet Phase IV vs V problem > Message-ID: <MPG.17ae93a96fc69d8989c74@news-server.nyc.rr.com>  B In article <B96A1A1A.17D4C%edl@euronet.nl>, edl@euronet.nl says... [snip]H > We have downgrade the router to IOS 12.1.7 and the problem disappears./ > So it is indeed something in the IOS 12.1.14. 9 > Does anyone has a workaround, because we need to IPSec.   0 You mean other than hardcoding the MAC address??   --     hsb   D "Somehow I imagined this experience would be more rewarding"  CalvinD ********************************************************************C Due to the volume of email that I receive, I may not not be able to D reply to emails sent to my account.  Please post a followup instead.D ********************************************************************   ------------------------------  # Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 02:02:20 GMT 5 From: "Fred Kleinsorge" <kleinsorge@star.zko.dec.com> 4 Subject: Re: Itanic2 - the cHumPaq spin continues...0 Message-ID: <Mm119.6$yO.124022@news.cpqcorp.net>  I Come on.  When a guy starts his comments by comparing the cancelling of a K CPU chip to an abortion, and a debate about which trimester... he certainly K isn't interested in any answer that doesn't agree with his world view.  His L original message used a sound bite of my calling the EV8 mythical.  Well, itK has reached mythic proportion.  I think the guys working on it were amongst H the best - even if I didn't myself agree with the direction of the AlphaH chip (towards expensive chips designed for large scale SMP servers, withJ little hope for any future low-end machine).  But I also had and have highL regard for the architects on the rest of the Alpha chips.  Nonetheless, theyI had not usually delivered on schedule, and the industry didn't sit by and H allow them to achieve 2x or 3x constant performance superiority, and for@ *whatever* reason, they also did not achive a low price or largeJ marketshare.  It is unlikely that EV8 would have changed that - regardlessF if it delivered on time, on budget, and with the promised performance.H Would it have been superior to other chips on the market?  Probably.  At least again for a short time.   J Compaq (RIP) could have decided to continue to invest in EV8, while behindL the scenes planning to move to Itanium and abandon Alpha.  IMHO they did theJ more honest thing.  They told people of their decision as soon as they hadG reached the agreements needed to move to IA64.  They gave Alpha users a . transitional roadmap.  They didn't cancel VMS.  L The only regret I have is that we didn't start the port to IA64 a year or soC earlier... because we could be selling VMS on those < $5k Itanium 2  workstations today.       < "David J. Dachtera" <djesys.nospam@fsi.net> wrote in message! news:3D42CEC5.326CD70A@fsi.net...  > Fred Kleinsorge wrote: > > @ > > "Brannon Batson" <Brannon_Batson@yahoo.com> wrote in message: > > news:4495ef1f.0207262230.b5c61b3@posting.google.com...; > > > "Bill Todd" <billtodd@metrocast.net> wrote in message C > > news:<FXg09.297878$iB1.15267619@bin4.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com>...  > > > > [snip]H > > > > BTW, at best the abortion occurred in the 2nd trimester, not the first, > > let J > > > > alone 'early in the first'.  The only question is just how late in the  > > 2nd. > > > >  > > > > - bill > > > K > > > I honestly don't know why people care about what the schedule was for K > > > EV8.  EV8 had lots of schedules--schedules are constantly reworked to J > > > reflect manufacturing timelines, resource allocations, etc.  EV8 wasL > > > pretty far along as a design in mid-2001 (when work stopped).  At thatL > > > point, for a number of reasons, an '04 ship seemed realistic.  There'sI > > > a lot of things that can make a chip slip though, so there's always  > > > big error bars on that.  > > >  > > K > > Apparently because Bill doesn't have much better to do than continue to H > > rehash the Alpha story.  Whenever the topic dies out, he'll trot out another H > > tome.  In Bill's mind, EV8 has reached mythic proportions.  It would haveJ > > arrived ahead of schedule, would have set every benchmark record, soldH > > millions, and solved world hunger.  Bill will, no doubt have his own unique > > spin on things.  > > F > > Given the current EV7 schedule, I have my doubts if EV8 would have shipped  > > in 2004, but who knows.  >  > Fred,  > E > I know we've had words here, also. So, I must be honest: you'd have D > garnered more credibility (does that word hold value for you?) forJ > yourself had you addressed Bill's comments about trust and trust broken. > G > By taking the easy way out, you have damaged your image in my eyes. I J > realize that may not be of much value to you, but if a moron like me canG > make such a simple connection, imagine what the intelligentsia may be 
 > thinking...  >  > -- > David J. Dachtera  > dba DJE Systems  > http://www.djesys.com/ > * > Unofficial Affordable OpenVMS Home Page:! > http://www.djesys.com/vms/soho/    ------------------------------  # Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 02:47:03 GMT 1 From: "David J. Dachtera" <djesys.nospam@fsi.net> 4 Subject: Re: Itanic2 - the cHumPaq spin continues...' Message-ID: <3D44B132.C7A5DD5A@fsi.net>    Fred Kleinsorge wrote: > [snip]L > Compaq (RIP) could have decided to continue to invest in EV8, while behind< > the scenes planning to move to Itanium and abandon Alpha.   H That would have more closely paralleled the VAX to Alpha transition and,C IMHO, would have been the better, more profitable course. It likely 6 would not have met Carly's demands, this I understand.   > IMHO they did the  > more honest thing.    G An old saying has it, "The road to hell is paved with good intentions". H In this case, tact may have been the more beneficial approach, for OVMS,F the customer base and ultimately the Q and their successors (HP, ...).  8 > They told people of their decision as soon as they had1 > reached the agreements needed to move to IA64.    ? I'd still assert that the matter was mishandled. When Alpha was G announced, VAX wasn't "killed" outright. I understand the circumstances E were different. The damage done this time may be irreversible, unless @ there is a major marketing push to raise VMS's visibility in the mainstream.    > They gave Alpha users a  > transitional roadmap.   ? ...after having previously given roadmaps, assurances, and yes, C commitments to the Alpha customer base about the future of Alpha. I @ believe the phrase, "Bet Your Business" was used more than once.   > They didn't cancel VMS.   G ...yet. Unless something happens on IPF, and damned fast, the o.s. with G no hardware platform will simply evaporate. Everyone from Carly on down 5 better get *REAL* clear on that! ...*REAL* damn fast!   N > The only regret I have is that we didn't start the port to IA64 a year or soE > earlier... because we could be selling VMS on those < $5k Itanium 2  > workstations today.   F You could be selling VMS on everything from <$600 desktops to <$15,000D enterprise servers now, if you get right down to it ... oh, yeah - I; forgot - I'm the only one who understands that. Oh, well...   F These are *MY* opinions and it is not likely that I will be swayed anyF more than you, Bill, or anyone else. So, let's just agree to disagree.  E You're an intelligent man and a remarkable engineer. I was not gifted F with high, measurable intelligence, but I get along as best I can in a% world that I must struggle to grasp.    E We are different, and our opinions are different. That's part of what D life is all about. So, let's accept our differences and move on, 'K?   --   David J. Dachtera  dba DJE Systems  http://www.djesys.com/  ( Unofficial Affordable OpenVMS Home Page: http://www.djesys.com/vms/soho/    ------------------------------  # Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 01:17:57 GMT ! From: rob.buxton@wcc.spam.govt.nz  Subject: Re: Open Files % Message-ID: <3d449714.622119600@news>   D On 27 Jul 2002 06:39:34 GMT, djweath@attglobal.net (Dave Weatherall) wrote:  7 >On Sat, 27 Jul 2002 02:48:42 UTC, "David J. Dachtera"   ><djesys.nospam@fsi.net> wrote:  >  >> "Ren Schelbaum" wrote: >> >  ? >> > "Shawn" <shawnm@cotepe.carenet.org> schrieb im Newsbeitrag , >> > news:3d413159.1003863@news.verio.net...L >> > > I have an Alpha Server running OpenVMS 7.2-1 which has 4 Shadow Sets. >> > > >> > >H >> > > Everytime I shutdown the server, one of the Shadow Sets DismountsK >> > > itself improperly.  It doesn't matter if I do it manually or let the  >> > > system do it. >> > >L >> > > Is there any commands anyone knows of, other than Show Sys which willK >> > > let me see the files that are currently opened and still being used. K >> > > I suspect that a file is not closed on this particular Shadow Set or $ >> > > that there is a hung process. >> > > >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > >> > > Shawn >> > > >> >   >> > Hi! >> >  ) >> > Try SHOW DEVICE / FILES <devicename>  >> >  Q >> > It lists all open files on that specific device and which app accesses them!t >> eK >> Careful, there! SH DEV/FI displays which *PROCESSES* are accessing filesa >> on a device for that sample.  >8G >Yup and only provides the info for the node the command is issued on. O$ >(or has that changed since 6.2 :-)) >m  D Cluster Wide file access is not the issue, the Poster will only needB to see which files the Node shutting down has open on a particular device.SC The only exception would be if the Node being shut down is the onlyM Member Serving that device.SC So, put show device /file <device> /out=file.log at the end of your C shutdown procedure and check the output. I went through exactly thee same issue here.   >--  >Cheers - Dave.    ------------------------------  + Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 19:10:03 +0000 (UTC)e% From: John Forkosh <john@invalid.com>k9 Subject: Re: OpenVMS VAX Hobbyist Kit (Montagar Sold Out)-, Message-ID: <ai1fib$6k5$1@reader3.panix.com>  . Didier Morandi <Didier.Morandi@Free.fr> wrote:7 : Who said so? I went to the montagar page and there isr : in there no such information.    : Jamie Stallwood wrote:E : > How would one obtain such a kit in the UK, given that it can't bet : > bought at this time?  ! There seem to be two pages there:n      .../hobbyist/media.html      .../hobbyist/mount.html7 that differ only in the "sold-out-ness" of the VAX kit. 5 If you go to the montagar home page and "drill down",.0 you'll get mount.html with the sold-out message.4 If you, say, go to the license page and fill out the6 forms, the last page provides a link to the media.html2 page, without the sold-out message.  But they are, alas, actually sold out. -- s> John Forkosh  ( mailto:  j@f.com  where j=john and f=forkosh )   ------------------------------  # Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 22:29:59 GMTi1 From: "David J. Dachtera" <djesys.nospam@fsi.net>.9 Subject: Re: OpenVMS VAX Hobbyist Kit (Montagar Sold Out)w' Message-ID: <3D4474FD.96B3C493@fsi.net>-   John Forkosh wrote:  > 0 > Didier Morandi <Didier.Morandi@Free.fr> wrote:9 > : Who said so? I went to the montagar page and there is ! > : in there no such information.9 >  > : Jamie Stallwood wrote:G > : > How would one obtain such a kit in the UK, given that it can't bed > : > bought at this time? > # > There seem to be two pages there:n >      .../hobbyist/media.html >      .../hobbyist/mount.html9 > that differ only in the "sold-out-ness" of the VAX kit.e7 > If you go to the montagar home page and "drill down",t2 > you'll get mount.html with the sold-out message.6 > If you, say, go to the license page and fill out the8 > forms, the last page provides a link to the media.html4 > page, without the sold-out message.  But they are, > alas, actually sold out.  B The D/FW guys aren't real pleased with me these days, but I'll tryD writing to Dave Cathey and ask would he mind if folks send him theirH money, then he e-mails me and I'll plagiarize the CDs and mail them out.  ; No guarantees - that's about the best I can do right now...r   -- n David J. Dachterax dba DJE Systems  http://www.djesys.com/  ( Unofficial Affordable OpenVMS Home Page: http://www.djesys.com/vms/soho/.   ------------------------------    Date: 28 Jul 2002 15:57:34 -07000 From: chris_doran@postmaster.co.uk (Chris Doran)9 Subject: Re: OpenVMS VAX Hobbyist Kit (Montagar Sold Out)a= Message-ID: <948f0720.0207281457.52ecb3d7@posting.google.com>'   Jamie Stallwood <this.no.work.try.something.else@project76.net> wrote in message news:<ju25kugu2hisktc7k3ddsr1i76f3ljft2b@4ax.com>...nC > How would one obtain such a kit in the UK, given that it can't be  > bought at this time?  F E-mail me if an out-of-date version will do -- V7.0 is as far as I got@ before my VMS-hating boss cancelled the maintenance contract :-(   Chris (London)   ------------------------------  + Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 01:54:39 +0000 (UTC)n0 From: watson_g@Encompasserve.org (George Watson), Subject: Re: PL/I Hobbyist kit now available/ Message-ID: <ai278v$3aj$1@grandcanyon.binc.net>R  _ In article <CIEJLCMNHNNDLLOOGNJIIEHIFHAA.tom@kednos.com>, "Tom Linden" <tom@kednos.com> writes:u; >We have made fully functional versions of the compiler form= >bot VAX and Alpha which repsect the OPENVMS-HOBBYIST licenseA< >paks.  You may downlad the kits from freja.kednos.com using" >anonymous ftp or ftp web browser. >t> >Would appreciate confirmation that they install properly with >such paks.a >i >Tom >--- Tom,  D   The installation kit fails, because of a call to CHECK_LICENSE (asI opposed to the primary call to CONFIRM_LICENSE, which can be successfullydJ lied to).  In the CHECK_PLISTR_INFO: section of KITINSTAL.COM, you need to* add the following after the CHECK_LICENSE:  " $       IF .NOT. PLISTR$LMF THEN -`           VMI$CALLBACK CHECK_LICENSE PLISTR$LMF OPENVMS-HOBBYIST DEC 0.0 'DPLI$LMF_RELEASE_DATE'  K After adding those two lines, I was able to install the kit, and it passed a the IVP.   --, George Watson					watson_g@encompasserve.org   ------------------------------  % Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 20:52:39 -0700e# From: "Tom Linden" <tom@kednos.com>t, Subject: RE: PL/I Hobbyist kit now available9 Message-ID: <CIEJLCMNHNNDLLOOGNJIMEHNFHAA.tom@kednos.com>i  D Sorry, about the goof, I will get this fixed tomorrow, meanwhile you5 can see what needs to be done from George's comments.    >-----Original Message-----e8 >From: George Watson [mailto:watson_g@Encompasserve.org]$ >Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 6:55 PM >To: Info-VAX@Mvb.Saic.Com- >Subject: Re: PL/I Hobbyist kit now available  >  > ? >In article <CIEJLCMNHNNDLLOOGNJIIEHIFHAA.tom@kednos.com>, "Tom ! >Linden" <tom@kednos.com> writes:P< >>We have made fully functional versions of the compiler for> >>bot VAX and Alpha which repsect the OPENVMS-HOBBYIST license= >>paks.  You may downlad the kits from freja.kednos.com usingv# >>anonymous ftp or ftp web browser.7 >>? >>Would appreciate confirmation that they install properly witha >>such paks. >> >>Tomf >>---  >Tom,t >OE >  The installation kit fails, because of a call to CHECK_LICENSE (asuJ >opposed to the primary call to CONFIRM_LICENSE, which can be successfullyK >lied to).  In the CHECK_PLISTR_INFO: section of KITINSTAL.COM, you need tot+ >add the following after the CHECK_LICENSE:e > # >$       IF .NOT. PLISTR$LMF THEN -iA >          VMI$CALLBACK CHECK_LICENSE PLISTR$LMF OPENVMS-HOBBYISTn  >DEC 0.0 'DPLI$LMF_RELEASE_DATE' >tK >After adding those two lines, I was able to install the kit, and it passede	 >the IVP.o >  >-- - >George Watson					watson_g@encompasserve.org: >r >---' >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. ; >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).rA >Version: 6.0.377 / Virus Database: 211 - Release Date: 7/15/2002w >r ---n& Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.: Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).@ Version: 6.0.377 / Virus Database: 211 - Release Date: 7/15/2002   ------------------------------    Date: 28 Jul 2002 13:58:35 -0700" From: junkp@comcast.net (B Pendry): Subject: Re: Powerstorm 300 and Alpha PC 164 with OVMS 7.3= Message-ID: <6b2b37d7.0207281258.3b8bc2fa@posting.google.com>a  L I am running VMS 7.2-2 with the graphics 0100 patch and get the same messageK I have a Powerstorm 300 and a PWS 500. I do not have OpenGL installed. DoesVN anyone know how to get the Powerstorm 300 to work?? Show dev g /full displays:  J Device GBA0:, device type DECwindows output device, is offline, device setF     /NOAVAILABLE, record-oriented device, carriage control, shareable.  O     Error count                    0    Operations completed                  0tO     Owner process                 ""    Owner UIC                      [SYSTEM]oO     Owner process ID        00000000    Dev Prot    S:RWPL,O:RWPL,G:RWPL,W:RWPLiO     Reference count                0    Default buffer size                   0*  7 All I want to do is to run DecWindows on my Workstation       n "Fred Kleinsorge" <kleinsorge@star.zko.dec.com> wrote in message news:<25e09.16$Kc.433202@news.cpqcorp.net>...I > You got it.  The driver tried to map the CSR's in flat address mode and 	 > failed.- >  > 4 > "Alan Greig" <a.greig@virgin.net> wrote in message4 > news:7sg2kucue6jmf3q5g5r3oe6tsok91mdjti@4ax.com...F > > On 26 Jul 2002 03:09:52 -0700, dugald_peacock@yahoo.com.au (Dugald > > Peacock) wrote:c > >e
 > > >Hello > > >nJ > > >I have inherited two Powerstorm 300 video cards and I wish to use oneA > > >in my OVMS PC164 Alpha.  However, when I replaced my current'H > > >Powerstorm 4D20 with a Powerstorm 300 and booted my Alpha with OVMSC > > >7.3 I got the following message (retyped from serial console).e > > > J > > >%GBDRIVER-I LOADED, P3XX Driver loaded on GBA0 for Head 1, TR 2, Slot > > >7.t< > > >%GBDRIVER-F-NOTMAPPED Could not map CSRs, status = 2044H > > >%GBDRIVER-F-NOTMAPPED Could not map texture memory, status = 0x2044   ------------------------------  # Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 02:06:52 GMT 5 From: "Fred Kleinsorge" <kleinsorge@star.zko.dec.com>a: Subject: Re: Powerstorm 300 and Alpha PC 164 with OVMS 7.31 Message-ID: <0r119.7$392.162916@news.cpqcorp.net>h  ' Get a DS10, an XP1000, or get a ZLXp-E?   D It won't work on the PWS500.  But the ZLXp-E will, or the ELSA will.    / "B Pendry" <junkp@comcast.net> wrote in message 7 news:6b2b37d7.0207281258.3b8bc2fa@posting.google.com...tF > I am running VMS 7.2-2 with the graphics 0100 patch and get the same messageoH > I have a Powerstorm 300 and a PWS 500. I do not have OpenGL installed. DoesF > anyone know how to get the Powerstorm 300 to work?? Show dev g /full	 displays:s >aL > Device GBA0:, device type DECwindows output device, is offline, device setH >     /NOAVAILABLE, record-oriented device, carriage control, shareable. >e> >     Error count                    0    Operations completed 0n3 >     Owner process                 ""    Owner UICe [SYSTEM]2 >     Owner process ID        00000000    Dev Prot S:RWPL,O:RWPL,G:RWPL,W:RWPL = >     Reference count                0    Default buffer size  0  >D9 > All I want to do is to run DecWindows on my Workstation  >s >4 >CB > "Fred Kleinsorge" <kleinsorge@star.zko.dec.com> wrote in message- news:<25e09.16$Kc.433202@news.cpqcorp.net>...sK > > You got it.  The driver tried to map the CSR's in flat address mode and  > > failed.d > >r > >.6 > > "Alan Greig" <a.greig@virgin.net> wrote in message6 > > news:7sg2kucue6jmf3q5g5r3oe6tsok91mdjti@4ax.com...H > > > On 26 Jul 2002 03:09:52 -0700, dugald_peacock@yahoo.com.au (Dugald > > > Peacock) wrote:  > > >e > > > >Hello > > > >eL > > > >I have inherited two Powerstorm 300 video cards and I wish to use oneC > > > >in my OVMS PC164 Alpha.  However, when I replaced my currenthJ > > > >Powerstorm 4D20 with a Powerstorm 300 and booted my Alpha with OVMSE > > > >7.3 I got the following message (retyped from serial console).a > > > >cL > > > >%GBDRIVER-I LOADED, P3XX Driver loaded on GBA0 for Head 1, TR 2, Slot	 > > > >7. > > > > >%GBDRIVER-F-NOTMAPPED Could not map CSRs, status = 2044J > > > >%GBDRIVER-F-NOTMAPPED Could not map texture memory, status = 0x2044   ------------------------------  # Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 19:54:06 GMTy( From: Alder <PGDEHMKOKIMD@spammotel.com>9 Subject: Re: Register an Hobbyist layered product license , Message-ID: <3D444BDD.1000002@spammotel.com>   Bradford J. Hamilton wrote:h > Hi Alder,t >  > O > Good luck!  You have shown remarkable stick-to-it-iveness so far; keep going!c >   I Thanks Bradford, and everyone else, for making it so easy to keep going. a-   The assistance of this group is phenomenal!    Alder    ------------------------------    Date: 28 Jul 2002 14:42:09 -0600B From: clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP (Simon Clubley)7 Subject: Re: [OT] The Kursk Disaster and MS Windows :-)a3 Message-ID: <pBJfNA6APSA7@eisner.encompasserve.org>r  c In article <3D430AB9.30A7E72C@aaa.com>, Jan-Erik =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F6derholm?= <aaa@aaa.com> writes:  > CSABA HARANGOZO wrote: >> g >> The Kursk Disasters >  > [snip...]h > = > As was sad, 118 young seamen was killed in this accident...a >  > What's funny with that ? >    Nothing.  H I almost replied yesterday, but I was wondering if I was the only person< to find it was in poor taste. I'm glad to see that I wasn't.  J [It's one thing for me make unfavourable comparisons to Russian cars in myG sig, but I consider the unexpected loss of any human life to be equally : tragic regardless of which nation that person belongs to.]   > Jan-Erik Sderholm..   Simon.   -- 3B Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP       + Microsoft: The Lada of the computing world.i   ------------------------------  # Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 22:24:35 GMTa1 From: "David J. Dachtera" <djesys.nospam@fsi.net>l7 Subject: Re: [OT] The Kursk Disaster and MS Windows :-)b' Message-ID: <3D4473B9.D637291B@fsi.net>t   Simon Clubley wrote: > e > In article <3D430AB9.30A7E72C@aaa.com>, Jan-Erik =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F6derholm?= <aaa@aaa.com> writes:a > > CSABA HARANGOZO wrote: > >> > >> The Kursk Disastern > > 
 > > [snip...]h > >e? > > As was sad, 118 young seamen was killed in this accident...  > >a > > What's funny with that ? > >, > 
 > Nothing. > J > I almost replied yesterday, but I was wondering if I was the only person> > to find it was in poor taste. I'm glad to see that I wasn't.  D Likewise, I was going to say that readers from the .ru TLD might notC appreciate the humor, depending upon their political leanings. ThenmD again, there's a *LOT* of satire around these days that is less thanG "politically correct", and you may know how I feel about THAT phrase...    -- i David J. Dachtera. dba DJE Systemsv http://www.djesys.com/  ( Unofficial Affordable OpenVMS Home Page: http://www.djesys.com/vms/soho/    ------------------------------   End of INFO-VAX 2002.414 ************************idn't cancel VMS.   G ...yet. Unless something happens on IPF, and damned fast, the o.s. with G no hardware platform will simply evaporate. Everyone from Carly on down 5 better get *REAL* clear on that! ...*REAL* damn fast!   N > The only regret I have is that we didn't start the port to IA64 a year or soE > earlier... because we could be selling VMS on those < $5k Itanium 2  > workstatio K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    	K    
K    K    K    
K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K     K    !K    "K    #K    $K    %K    &K    'K    (K    )K    *K    +K    ,K    -K    .K    /K    0K    1K    2K    3K    4K    5K    6K    7K    8K    9K    :K    ;K    <K    =K    >K    ?K    @K    AK    BK    CK    DK    EK    FK    GK    HK    IK    JK    KK    LK    MK    NK    OK    PK    QK    RK    SK    TK    UK    VK    WK    XK    YK    ZK    [K    \K    ]K    ^K    _K    `K    aK    bK    cK    dK    eK    fK    gK    hK    iK    jK    kK    lK    mK    nK    oK    pK    qK    rK    sK    tK    uK    vK    wK    xK    yK    zK    {K    |K    }K    ~K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    K    