1 INFO-VAX	Mon, 10 Jun 2002	Volume 2002 : Issue 319       Contents:& RE: Alpha to ia64: where is the issue?  AS-1000A Firmware upgrade manual$ Re: AS-1000A Firmware upgrade manual Re: Fibre Disk vs. SCSI Disk Fibre disks free space drift= Re: How to put my VMS box on a BroadBand Connection (part II) D Re: Is there a supported way to determine the version no of DWMOTIF?* Re: just got this - OpenVMS faxing utility Re: MOZILLA and CSWB Re: OpenVMS FAQ  Re: OpenVMS VAX V6.2 on Galaxy! P Re: The Press and the IA-64 Port (was Re: Another analyst says VMS port won't beP Re: The Press and the IA-64 Port (was Re: Another analyst says VMS port won't beP Re: The Press and the IA-64 Port (was Re: Another analyst says VMS port won't be RE: Tivoli ABC for VMS Re: Tivoli ABC for VMS" tpc/ip file server for VMS systems& Re: tpc/ip file server for VMS systems Re: VMS Monitoring a User 1 Re: WASD 7.2.2 download is not HTROOT722.ZIP ?... 1 Re: WASD 7.2.2 download is not HTROOT722.ZIP ?...  Re: xtoolkit error  F ----------------------------------------------------------------------  $ Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 13:58:45 -0400' From: "Main, Kerry" <Kerry.Main@hp.com> / Subject: RE: Alpha to ia64: where is the issue? T Message-ID: <BE56C50EA024184DAF48F0B9A47F5CF4023D913B@kaoexc01.americas.cpqcorp.net>   Arne,   D >>>   2) even if it is just a re-compile, then there are still costs:      (hardware and software purchase, testing etc.etc.)<<<  H While you are correct, something to keep in mind from a developers and =I support point of view - assuming a SAN is in place, the same system IPF = G HW will be able to be used in the future to test and support not only = A multiple versions of OpenVMS, but also W64 (whenever it becomes = F available), HP-UX, or Linux. Simply point the boot device to another = part of the SAN.   Regards   
 Kerry Main Senior Consultant  Hewlett-Packard Canada! Consulting & Integration Services  Voice: 613-592-4660  Fax   : 613-591-4477 Email: Kerry.Main@hp.com     -----Original Message-----6 From: Arne Vajh=F8j [mailto:arne.vajhoej@gtech.com]=20 Sent: May 14, 2002 8:35 AM To: Info-VAX@Mvb.Saic.Com / Subject: Re: Alpha to ia64: where is the issue?      jlsue wrote:6 > On Fri, 10 May 2002 15:52:13 +0200, Arne Vajh=F8j=20! > <arne.vajhoej@gtech.com> wrote:  > >Didier Morandi wrote:B > >> What is to you the main problem(s) about the Alpha to ia64=20 > >> migration?  > > H > >Huge business problem: when a manager hear about the "migrate from=20D > >VMS Alpha to VMS IA-64" plan, then he would be very tempted to=20C > >replace it with a "migrate from VMS Alpha to Windows IA-64" plan 7 > >or a "migrate from VMS Alpha to Solaris SPARC" plan.  >=20H > Even if the migration to VMS IA-64 is a simple re-compile? Has this=201 > manager really done a cost analysis of porting?    Yes. No.   Two reasons:A   1) many managers do not really understand the technical aspects @   2) even if it is just a re-compile, then there are still costs7      (hardware and software purchase, testing etc.etc.)    Arne   ------------------------------  # Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 21:58:38 GMT ( From: Alder <PGDEHMKOKIMD@spammotel.com>) Subject: AS-1000A Firmware upgrade manual , Message-ID: <3D03CF8C.6080508@spammotel.com>  F The HP/Compaq site seems to have a dead link to the firmware manual I G want to read before I try upgrading the firmware in my AS-1000A.  I've  H no idea if I NEED to read this doc, but as a complete newbie I'd better  be safer than sorrier.  H Does anyone have a copy of this manual they'd like to share?  It's name  on the HPQ site is:    alpha800_1000a_v57_fw_rnote.pdf    Many thanks, Alder    ------------------------------  # Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 01:20:58 GMT ( From: Alder <PGDEHMKOKIMD@spammotel.com>- Subject: Re: AS-1000A Firmware upgrade manual , Message-ID: <3D03FEF9.6030801@spammotel.com>   Dirk Munk wrote: > Alder wrote: > I >> The HP/Compaq site seems to have a dead link to the firmware manual I  J >> want to read before I try upgrading the firmware in my AS-1000A.  I've D >> no idea if I NEED to read this doc, but as a complete newbie I'd   >> better be safer than sorrier. >>F >> Does anyone have a copy of this manual they'd like to share?  It's  >> name on the HPQ site is:  >>" >> alpha800_1000a_v57_fw_rnote.pdf >> >> Many thanks,  >> Alder >> > F > It is on the firmware CD's, but I don't have one here at the moment.K > But you're right, the pdf & textfiles are no longer on the web site, not  K > even when you read the directories from a FTP listing. Someone at Compaq  / > has been messing around with them I guess ...  >   H I'm a little hesitant to order the CDs.  I ordered the Hobbyist CD back D on April 30 and have yet to receive it.  Can someone perhaps e-mail  their copy to me?    Thanks,  Alder    ------------------------------  # Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 23:43:20 GMT - From: "John E. Malmberg" <wb8tyw@qsl.network> % Subject: Re: Fibre Disk vs. SCSI Disk * Message-ID: <3D03E493.6090005@qsl.network>   Peter LANGSTOEGER wrote:F > As I watched a discussion between two people with different opinionsF > and I have no information yet, to know who has the better arguments, > I'd like to ask you: > E > What do you think on the advantages of Fibre Disks vs. SCSI Disks ?   G I would tend to recommend FIBRE if you need the highest performance or  & multiple host access to the disk farm.  F You can not currently get direct access to Fibre disks on OpenVMS, so $ access is through a raid controller.  H The price performance ratio between SCSI disks and Fibre disks is going 5 to vary with market conditions.  Same with IDE disks.   8 So for single systems, the answer will continue to vary.  4 For clusters, or multiple systems attached to a SAN:  D There will probably be more low-end Fibre attached raid controllers F available in the future.  Some use SCSI disks on their back end, some  will use Fibre Channel.    -John  wb8tyw@qsl.network Personal Opinion Only    ------------------------------  # Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 02:27:06 GMT 0 From: "Steve McGinley" <smcginl1@bigpond.net.au>% Subject: Fibre disks free space drift @ Message-ID: <_7UM8.281228$o66.725407@news-server.bigpond.net.au>  L Anyone seen free space drift on fibre disks connected to systems running VMSF V7.2-1.  I'm used to seeing some free space drift on CI disks, but I'mE talking about several Gb's worth of drift on fibe disks on occasions.    Regards    ------------------------------   Date: 9 Jun 02 14:28:18 +0200 ) From: p_sture@elias.decus.ch (Paul Sture) F Subject: Re: How to put my VMS box on a BroadBand Connection (part II)) Message-ID: <JQ5XBgnz1Rr$@elias.decus.ch>   K In article <3D007CBD.4070607@Free.fr>, DTL <Didier.Morandi@Free.fr> writes: ; > DTL02::DTL up and running... but not the iMac anymore :-(  > N Then I would recommend you stop the masquerading software on the iMac and giveI it its own fixed IP address in the same range as tha ADSL router and your > Alpha. Also specify the same gateway as you did for the Alpha.   __
 Paul Sture Switzerland    ------------------------------   Date: 9 Jun 02 14:06:37 +0200 ) From: p_sture@elias.decus.ch (Paul Sture) M Subject: Re: Is there a supported way to determine the version no of DWMOTIF? ) Message-ID: <X52uglu5mT0S@elias.decus.ch>   _ In article <adhh5j$lel$2@web1.cup.hp.com>, hoffman@xdelta.zko.dec.nospam (Hoff Hoffman) writes:  > W > In article <JDferSE2J3$2@elias.decus.ch>, p_sture@elias.decus.ch (Paul Sture) writes: D > :Oops, "entirely harmless" enough to break a piece of code written > :in 1995 :-) :-) > J >   Bummer.  Sorry.  But please consider that code that is looking at the L >   image header and the image identification strings is already looking at I >   an undocumented layer of OpenVMS -- and thus is reasonably subject to D >   breakage.  The format and structure of the image headers is not L >   documented anywhere outside of the source listings and definition files L >   and (to a certain extent) the IDSM.  In particular, please realize that J >   the OpenVMS port to IA-64 will have wholely new underpinnings in this H >   area, and in the area of object modules.  Pretty much any code that I >   believes it knows about an image header or about the object language   >   will have to change. > J >   You could, of course, patch the image headers.  Specifically, the textM >   string sitting in the image identification field of the image header. :-)  >   H I'd rather not go there, thanks. This is part of a KITINSTAL.COM so gets+ executed on systems I don't have access to.   G The solution was simple, namely to change my SEARCH string from v1.2 to 	 v1.2,t1.2    > 	--  > I >   None of this, of course, excuses the original (and minor) infraction  J >   here, the use of a field test version string in a released version of J >   the image(s).  But I simply don't expect to see new images or a patch G >   kit released for V1.2-6 to fix this.  That said, I will pass a note G >   -- I hesitate to call it a bug report -- along to one of the local  G >   folks that oversees this area, and specifically concerning the V1.3 0 >   release that is presently under development. >  Much appreciated thanks. __
 Paul Sture Switzerland    ------------------------------   Date: 9 Jun 02 14:13:05 +0200 ) From: p_sture@elias.decus.ch (Paul Sture) 3 Subject: Re: just got this - OpenVMS faxing utility ) Message-ID: <sSfWbp9nVEXJ@elias.decus.ch>    In article <00A0F103.DCB6EBF9@SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>, winston@SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU ("Alan Winston - SSRL Admin Cmptg Mgr") writes: U > In article <3CFF86B3.62995506@uiowa.edu>, Rick Dyson <rick-dyson@uiowa.edu> writes:  >>"Ruslan R. Laishev" wrote: >>>  >>> Hi ! >>> D >>>         This SW still working only with exotic Multitech modems? >>F >>Maybe, but I will defend the Mutitech modems and would not call themD >>exotic. :)  They are just proffessional quality.  They run all theH >>time and generally don't fail or hicup.  In my experience, I can't say8 >>that for the USRs and all the 'no names' of the world. >>I >>Heck, the 56k models only cost ~ US$120.  High compared to the internal 6 >>PC clones, but you don't want one of them anyway. :) > O > I was a happy Gold-FAX system manager for several years, and never had a lick - > of trouble from the exotic Multitech modem.  > ' > (Now we have an NT-based "solution".)  > ' How much does this "solution" dissolve?  >  > Q > =============================================================================== 2 >  Alan Winston --- WINSTON@SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDUO >  Disclaimer: I speak only for myself, not SLAC or SSRL   Phone:  650/926-3056 O >  Physical mail to: SSRL -- SLAC BIN 69, PO BOX 4349, STANFORD, CA  94309-0210 Q > ===============================================================================  >  --   __
 Paul Sture Switzerland    ------------------------------   Date: 9 Jun 02 15:24:26 +0200 ) From: p_sture@elias.decus.ch (Paul Sture)  Subject: Re: MOZILLA and CSWB ) Message-ID: <d9XVayUvPhfj@elias.decus.ch>   W In article <3D019EBF.DDF4EA3C@Free.fr>, Didier Morandi <Didier.Morandi@Free.fr> writes: ( > For the moment, I have CSWB installed. > The About page says: > ' > Compaq Secure Web Browser (CSWB) T1.0  > blabla Mozilla 5.0 blabla  > --- < > Compaq Secure Web Browser T1.0 is based upon Mozilla 0.9.6+ > (c) 2002 Alouette Placard Corporation etc  >  > @ > This is why I asked the question. Moz 0.9.6 is not 1.0, is it? >   . The latest version was put up on 6-JUN-2002 atH http://www.openvms.compaq.com/openvms/products/ips/register_mozilla.html   __
 Paul Sture Switzerland    ------------------------------   Date: 9 Jun 02 16:01:21 +0200 ) From: p_sture@elias.decus.ch (Paul Sture)  Subject: Re: OpenVMS FAQ) Message-ID: <hFfAvprEDR2K@elias.decus.ch>   ` In article <3D035072.6C671634@digital.com>, Mike Rechtman <michael.rechtman@digital.com> writes:1 > There is a copy of the *NEW*IMPROVED* FAQ up at & > http://eisner.decus.org/vms/faq.htm   ( This one brings up the following screen:                Click              Shark logo " if you do not see the OpenVMS FAQ    Tested on VMS Netscape 3.0  J I'm using 3.03 Netscape on VMS here. I do have to click on the logo, which7 takes me to http://eisner.decus.org/vms/vmsfaq.html#TOP ; Puzzling thing - it takes me to the bottom of that page :-)     , > (old address, points to the new file, at:)) > http://eisner.decus.org/vms/vmsfaq.html   6 And that address takes me to the top of the same page.   > 4 > Many thanks to Mr. Hoffman - Three rousing cheers! >  Ditto.   __
 Paul Sture Switzerland    ------------------------------  % Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 22:52:13 -0500 3 From: Steve Sparrow <sdsparrow1n0spam@netscape.net> ( Subject: Re: OpenVMS VAX V6.2 on Galaxy!O Message-ID: <CEA42564A1DFDD40.A028FABB65926D78.874236DB82524AC9@lp.airnews.net>   ? Thanks for the info and thanks to the OpenVMS engineering group  for the great work they do.    Bart Zorn wrote: Larry Kilgallen wrote: Hoff Hoffman wrote:    ------------------------------   Date: 9 Jun 02 14:34:49 +0200 ) From: p_sture@elias.decus.ch (Paul Sture) Y Subject: Re: The Press and the IA-64 Port (was Re: Another analyst says VMS port won't be ) Message-ID: <mqVBPAnM71gy@elias.decus.ch>   ` In article <adq9h5$2uva$1@info.cs.uofs.edu>, bill@triangle.cs.uofs.edu (Bill Gunshannon) writes:= > In article <Xns92257D28DB274LenNewsgroupID@16.105.248.153>, 5 >  Leonard Fehskens <len.fehskens@compaq.com> writes:  > |>  I > |> Because your definition of proprietary is not the fundamental issue. K > |> It doesn't matter if the operating system has only one supplier.  What I > |> matters is that the boxes, and the desired applications that run on  8 > |> those boxes, are available from multiple suppliers. > K > And just how many different companies are currently releasing versions of J > Windows2K and Office2K??  BestBuy and Sam's Club are just resellers likeK > Island and any number of otherAlpha/VMS resellers.  When one looks at the M > reality of it, Microsoft products are just as proprietary as OpenVMS.  It's J > just that apparently the people at the helm of Compaq (and now HP) don't/ > understand enough about reality to know that.  >   N It appears that someone suggested that the Open in OpenVMS is silent, but they+ got carried away and dropped the V as well.    :-)  __
 Paul Sture Switzerland    ------------------------------   Date: 9 Jun 2002 19:57:57 -0700 ( From: bob@instantwhip.com (Bob Ceculski)Y Subject: Re: The Press and the IA-64 Port (was Re: Another analyst says VMS port won't be = Message-ID: <d7791aa1.0206091857.4edc738c@posting.google.com>   u martin@radiogaga.harz.de (Martin Vorlaender) wrote in message news:<3d03576c.524144494f47414741@radiogaga.harz.de>... + > Bob Ceculski (bob@instantwhip.com) wrote: K > > and VMS can run practically any unix/linux/java app with a simple port! 2 > > so why does Capellas think VMS is proprietary? > ! > A simple port? A *simple* port?  > L > Bob, you clearly have no idea what you're talking about (as far as porting2 > Unix applications goes - don't know about Java). > F > The mess alone that autoconf poses to try and maintain compatibilityG > between different Unices should convince anyone that porting anything I > but the most trivial programs to a different OS is a major undertaking.  > C > Granted, sometimes there's an issue of sloppy coding that hinders ) > a port, but that's not the whole truth.  >  > cu, 
 >   Martin  E I thought "c" was a portable lnaguage across platforms ... I guess it D isn't as portable as java ... java ports to vms from what I hear areE not that bad, most are simple ... ericom is porting their web connect B product right now, and it is taking them roughly 3 months ... that includes testing ...   ------------------------------  % Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 00:23:51 -0400 - From: JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@videotron.ca> Y Subject: Re: The Press and the IA-64 Port (was Re: Another analyst says VMS port won't be , Message-ID: <3D0429D7.C7E695B7@videotron.ca>   Bob Ceculski wrote: G > I thought "c" was a portable lnaguage across platforms ... I guess it F > isn't as portable as java ... java ports to vms from what I hear areG > not that bad, most are simple ... ericom is porting their web connect D > product right now, and it is taking them roughly 3 months ... that > includes testing ...  N One has to wonder what sort of interface to web server is being developped andN how that would affect application efficiency. Spawn a process that starts JAVAL and executes your program for every request ? Use ICC ? Mailboxes ? Decnet ?L Or do they do their homework and really port it to rusn as a shareable imageH part of the web server process ? And which web servers do they support ?   ------------------------------  $ Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 14:12:35 -0400' From: "Main, Kerry" <Kerry.Main@hp.com>  Subject: RE: Tivoli ABC for VMSsT Message-ID: <BE56C50EA024184DAF48F0B9A47F5CF402660756@kaoexc01.americas.cpqcorp.net>   David,  H >>> Of course, the idea is to use the hot site for business continuationG only for as long as it takes to either restore the existing facility ora to secure another.<<<d  D Yep, but restoring a burned out datacenter or finding another backup@ site are not trivial things typically done in a couple of weeks.  F Actually this is reason I have heard discussions are starting for someC mission critical sites to now start looking at 3 sites instead of 2a (active-active-passive?).=20  E To expand - 9/11 issues meant a large number of Customers were either.H all looking for backup sites or, since the primary was gone and they canE not afford to run their business on one site, backups to their backup. (now primary) sites.=20   A Now, since there were only limited facilities available, it meantoF everyone was now competing for the same limited facilities. With a 3rd@ site, you would have much more flexibility as links, storage andE facilities would already be in place and may only have to add systemsv and a few other things..   Regardsn  
 Kerry Main Senior Consultanta Hewlett-Packard Canada! Consulting & Integration Services  Voice: 613-592-4660a Fax   : 613-591-4477 Email: Kerry.Main@hp.com     -----Original Message-----9 From: David J. Dachtera [mailto:djesys.nospam@fsi.net]=20- Sent: May 18, 2002 9:29 PM To: Info-VAX@Mvb.Saic.Com0 Subject: Re: Tivoli ABC for VMS      "Main, Kerry" wrote: >=20 > David, >=20B > >>> That still begs the question: if all of the Comdisco/SungardA > customers suddenly elected to change from 'hot site' to (the=20  > equivalent? > of) "long distance clustering", would sufficient bandwidth beh	 available0< > at that scale for costs which would not be prohibitive?<<< >=20  > Well, cost is a relative term. >=20I > Hot backup sites for a med-large config typically start at $250K per=20 H > year (every year) with the actual daily rates (if implemented) running  H > around $10-$15K/day. Think about the total costs if the company had to  4 > run its business for 3+ months in the backup site.  D Of course, the idea is to use the hot site for business continuationG only for as long as it takes to either restore the existing facility or  to secure another.  E > Imho, the decision is not unlike spending lots of $'s to rent an=20 I > apartment vs. wanting to see the $'s better invested and deciding to=200
 > buy a home.8  F Well, I think I know what youre trying to say, but the comparison is aG bit rough. The reasons for owning a home vs. renting are (at least) two B fold: tax advantages and build up of equity. Then again, a company@ tyoically does not "own" telecomm. facilities outside of its ownF premises, withthepossible expection of those few who can afford to own their own satellites.   J > P.s. not sure if you knew this, but Comdisco no longer exists. It had=20D > financial problems and Sungard bought their Business Continuity=20	 > assets.  >=20 > Reference: > www.comdisco.com  ? Yes. I have local contacts inside of the former Comdisco. To my@H knowledge, they are continuing to use the Comdisco name, but my info. onA that is a bit stale. Then again, Comdisco's business continuationtF services were to Comdisco corporate rather like VMS is to HPQ: a money> maker amid marginal or money-losing other businesses. BusinessF continuation has always made them money (AFAIK), unlike other areas ofC the company which foundered and led Comdisco's bottom line down then drain.   --=20o David J. Dachterad dba DJE SystemsI http://www.djesys.com/  H Unofficial Affordable OpenVMS Home Page: http://www.djesys.com/vms/soho/   ------------------------------  % Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 15:33:48 -0400t- From: JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@videotron.ca>i Subject: Re: Tivoli ABC for VMS,, Message-ID: <3D03AD95.8E46300E@videotron.ca>   "Main, Kerry" wrote:G > To expand - 9/11 issues meant a large number of Customers were either'J > all looking for backup sites or, since the primary was gone and they canG > not afford to run their business on one site, backups to their backupo > (now primary) sites.  H On the grand scheme of things, not wishing to diminish the horror of theI disaster, wasn't this not such a big deal in terms of number of companiess* whose data centre was actually destroyed ?  N Yes, many lost connectivity when the WTC fell onto the telephone exchange. andL obviously those in the WTC and a few adjoining buildings would have seen the= data centres on those buildings rendered unusable for months.t  N But Amex is re-integrating its building. Would it have really bothered settingN a backup site to their backup knowing that their prime site would come back in a couple of months ?  L Also, when you look at Cantor Fitzgerald, I believe that their London officeM took over the processing. So once their backup site (I assume New Jersey) wasaN back up and the few remaining employees were able to start working again, they+ would still  have London as backup, right ?n    M I think that offices should be treated differently than a building whose solelK purpose is to house your data processing operations. That building needs  afH backup.  But your office building needs a contigency plan. You have manyM desktop machines that need rebuilding, departmental servers (possibly loss of-M emails etc), phones, desks, and in the case of WTC, there is also the problemm of lost employees.   ------------------------------  $ Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 21:01:30 -0600! From: "rf" <rlfitch@peakpeak.com> + Subject: tpc/ip file server for VMS systems ? Message-ID: <DJEIILNNMOFLAFBPGIEHMEGIDAAA.rlfitch@peakpeak.com>e  J Is it possible/practical to setup LINUX/BSD to provide file/print servicesG for VMS/AXP (OVMS 6.2) system(s) over IP?  If so some guidance would be- appreciated.   Thanks,: Ransom Fitch   ------------------------------  # Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 04:13:00 GMTSL From: winston@SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU ("Alan Winston - SSRL Admin Cmptg Mgr")/ Subject: Re: tpc/ip file server for VMS systemsD8 Message-ID: <00A0F382.E65D8FF6@SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>  D In article <DJEIILNNMOFLAFBPGIEHMEGIDAAA.rlfitch@peakpeak.com>, "rf" <rlfitch@peakpeak.com> writes:  K >Is it possible/practical to setup LINUX/BSD to provide file/print services H >for VMS/AXP (OVMS 6.2) system(s) over IP?  If so some guidance would be
 >appreciated.a  J Linux/xBSD can provide NFS service for file and LPD service for print.  ToJ take advantage of this you need to have an IP package on your VMS machine,I and it needs to support NFS _client_ and LPR client.  (All three main IP XJ packages do, but I believe NFS used to an extra-cost option for Multinet - could be wrong.)  K The commands for getting this stuff set up will vary with which IP package cJ you're using, so your next step would be to come back with the group with / the name and version number of your IP package.    -- Alan)  O =============================================================================== 0  Alan Winston --- WINSTON@SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDUM  Disclaimer: I speak only for myself, not SLAC or SSRL   Phone:  650/926-3056eM  Physical mail to: SSRL -- SLAC BIN 69, PO BOX 4349, STANFORD, CA  94309-0210eO ===============================================================================    ------------------------------   Date: 9 Jun 02 14:31:37 +0200a) From: p_sture@elias.decus.ch (Paul Sture)A" Subject: Re: VMS Monitoring a User) Message-ID: <WcGDs2+qyBRY@elias.decus.ch>o  W In article <3D009C56.9030600@tsoft-inc.com>, David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> writes:a( >> Ab <spammitplease@yahoo.co.in> wrote: >> : Hi All H >> :   We have OpenVMS 6.2 .. want to monitor a user for the commands he >> : executes.H >> :  We have a problem with some privileged user logging in and killingJ >> : other logins (other users logged in are automatically logged out). WeF >> : want to monitor that user and create logs of the commands that heI >> : executes with time information. Is there any VMS utility that allows  >> : us to do this.u >> :  Thanks in Advance  >  > K > I seem to remember several third party tools that will do what you want. sN > CONTROL, possibly now sold by RAXCO, not sure, and Peek and Spy, forget the  > vendor name. > > Peek and Spy can be found at http://www.networkingdynamics.com   __
 Paul Sture Switzerlanda   ------------------------------  % Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 23:20:05 +0200e- From: Didier Morandi <Didier.Morandi@Free.fr>e: Subject: Re: WASD 7.2.2 download is not HTROOT722.ZIP ?...' Message-ID: <3D03C683.7FFC150F@Free.fr>    I did.   D.   Mark Daniel wrote: > ; > Submit a Bugzilla report ... http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/l > C > Wait for the next update (or the next after that) of VMS Mozilla.D   ------------------------------  % Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 22:51:49 -0500AC From: "Craig A. Berry" <craig.berry@nospam.SignalTreeSolutions.com> : Subject: Re: WASD 7.2.2 download is not HTROOT722.ZIP ?...H Message-ID: <craig.berry-97C88B.22514909062002@news.directvinternet.com>  H I've had no trouble downloading ZIP files with Mozilla 1.0 on VMS 7.3.  H The problems you have been describing are characteristic of an outdated F version of UNZIP.  Current is 5.50.  Less than 5.42 is prone to major E difficulties when unzipping archives created with recent versions of I ZIP.  ' In article <3D03C683.7FFC150F@Free.fr>, /  Didier Morandi <Didier.Morandi@Free.fr> wrote:    > I did. >  > D. >  > Mark Daniel wrote: > > = > > Submit a Bugzilla report ... http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/y > > E > > Wait for the next update (or the next after that) of VMS Mozilla.r   ------------------------------   Date: 9 Jun 02 15:38:25 +0200 ) From: p_sture@elias.decus.ch (Paul Sture)  Subject: Re: xtoolkit error ) Message-ID: <PvKD1B3iZtFX@elias.decus.ch>=  m In article <b6bf97d5.0206080601.108deb68@posting.google.com>, merritt.robert@spsd.sk.ca (rob merritt) writes: 7 > Thanks guys I tried them both and here is what I got:P >  > from create/term/detacha >  l > $ create/term/detach- > %DECW-E-CANT_OPEN_DISPL, Can't open display= >  = > from  r decw$examples:ico.exe= > $ r decw$examples:ico.exe= > $ M > (i get nothing???? so then I turned on SET WATCH FILE ?CLASS=MAJOR and get)a >  > $ r decw$examples:ico.exem3 > %XQP, Thread #0, Lookup  (0,0,0) Status: 00000910M? > %XQP, Thread #0, Access ICO.EXE;1 (8576,2,0) Status: 00000001nL > %XQP, Thread #0, Deaccess (8576,2,0) Reads: 9, Writes: 0, Status: 00000001 > $s >  > what do you think? >   ! This could be a security problem.:  I On the desktop control panel, click on the icon with the mouse and colour ; palette. In the resulting pop up window, click on security.a  M Now add the users and transports you wish to have access to create windows one
 your desktop.   = On my home system, for example, I have the following entries:   
 DECNET * *	 TCPIP * *w  H IIRC the TCPIP transport only understands wildcards, not individual user names. __
 Paul Sture Switzerland-   ------------------------------   End of INFO-VAX 2002.319 ************************