1 INFO-VAX	Sat, 07 Aug 2004	Volume 2004 : Issue 435       Contents: Re: rx2600 and SAS  F ----------------------------------------------------------------------  % Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 11:28:12 -0500 2 From: David J Dachtera <djesys.nospam@comcast.net> Subject: Re: rx2600 and SAS + Message-ID: <4115031C.8AC592B6@comcast.net>    Tom Linden wrote:  >  > < -----Original Message-----7 > < From: Paul Repacholi [mailto:prep@prep.synonet.com] ) > < Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 1:59 PM  > < To: Info-VAX@Mvb.Saic.Com  > < Subject: Re: rx2600 and SAS  > <  > < 9 > < Patrick Young <patrick@hilux.ace.unsw.EDU.AU> writes:  > < C > < > Cobol? - we have an application still written in it would you  > < > believe? > < I > < A bank as part of the total rewrite they did for Y2K dropped PL/I and 4 > < did it ALL in COBOL. Not a line of C to be seen. >  > And that is progress?   3 If it solved their Y2K problem, why wouldn't it be?    D.J.D.   ------------------------------   End of INFO-VAX 2004.435 ************************