1 INFO-VAX	Wed, 11 Aug 2004	Volume 2004 : Issue 443       Contents: clm privilege violation  Re: Front page strikes Re: Front page strikes Re: Front page strikes Re: Front page strikes Re: Front page strikes Re: Front page strikes RE: Front page strikes& Help- sysadmin support recommendations* Re: How far back does SYI$_MAIN_MEMORY go?* Re: How far back does SYI$_MAIN_MEMORY go?" IBM's mainframe momentum continues- Re: Is it decnet problem or Thruway problem ? , It's a pity they didn't survey OpenVMS users0 Re: It's a pity they didn't survey OpenVMS users Re: LAVC/SCA Traffic Re: LAVC/SCA Traffic Re: MPlayer is a DVD player 3 Re: Need assistance for OpenVMS trade press article 3 Re: Need assistance for OpenVMS trade press article 3 Re: Need assistance for OpenVMS trade press article 3 Re: Need assistance for OpenVMS trade press article ! Re: ssh on HP TCP/IP Services 5.4 C Re: TECO manual location, was: Re: [Somewhat OT] What your non-OVMS 0 Re: Using Fibrechannel on a Personal Workstation Re: VMS 5.0 or 5.1 needed   F ----------------------------------------------------------------------  # Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 16:49:49 GMT ( From: Gray Lensman <GrayLensman@bci.com>  Subject: clm privilege violation4 Message-ID: <110820040949496069%GrayLensman@bci.com> Keywords: vms opcom error    Hi:   G I am getting the following opcom messages on all my OpenVMS 7.2 cluster  nodes:  G %%%%%%%%%%%  OPCOM   9-AUG-2004 01:00:47.89  %%%%%%%%%%%  DUMP_LOG_FILE   F OPCOM has noticed a condition which might be due to an internal error.E It might also be explained by normal events, especially if nodes have F justcrashed or rebooted in a VAXcluster.  Please bring this message toA Digital's attention only if you are having problems with operator  communications.   ; Buffer is    60 (%X003C) bytes -- "clm privilege violation"   ?  6174733C 20202020 20204D45 54535953 00010004 FFFFFFFF 5FFFFFFF @ 00000008 ......._........SYSTEM      <sta 0000 00000000 000000009 04070001 000D0001 000D0000 00160902 0213130C 203E7472 rt> ! ............................ 0020   D I found references to the shadow server, we do have out system disks@ shadowed. We did replace the cache batteries on the FDDI storage system.    Anyone have any ideas?   --   --- 
 Kent Behrends  BEHR Consulting International  http://www.bci.com   ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:44:08 +0200 * From: Paul Sture <nospam@sture.homeip.net> Subject: Re: Front page strikes * Message-ID: <2nu83cF4nfh7U1@uni-berlin.de>   William Webb wrote: m > jordan@ccs4vms.com (Rich Jordan) wrote in message news:<cc5619f2.0408091405.25f9656d@posting.google.com>...  > H >>Anyone out there been forced to use ms frontpage with an OpenVMS Alpha >>based CSWS webserver?  >>G >>The DS15 I asked about converting disks from ODS2 to ODS5 a few weeks E >>ago is now running CSWS (current 1.X version, not the 2.0 beta, all G >>patches), but we held off on PHP/Perl/MySQL, etc until we had time to ? >>do the ODS5 conversion.  Out of the blue we now have to let a F >>frontpage developer work with the system.  System is OpenVMS V7.3-2, >>patched up, TCPIP V5.4 eco 2.  >>H >>There are no frontpage extensions in CSWS, so we tried the ftp publishF >>with a dedicated account aimed at the root for that site's directory >>tree.  Problems: >>E >>     Multi-dot filenames fail (and no found way to turn them off in  >>msfp) D >>     All files transmitted in binary (HTM files are 512-byte fixed >>length record) >>C >>There doesn't seem to be much in COV about using msfp with CSWS.  E >>Outside of expediting the ODS5 conversion (which was schedule for a E >>couple of weekends from now, which may no longer be acceptable), if E >>anyone has useful suggestions or gotchas to post, please do.  Sadly F >>using a different/better page builder is not an option; customer hasA >>spoken.  Also, mass editing the files to change references from H >>multidot to ODS-2 legal names, and finding a way to transfer the filesD >>with appropriate character substitution in the names has also been >>nixed. >> >>Thanks in advance. >> >>Rich >  > . > Ever looked at the HTML that MSFP creates?   > & > Ugh! Hideous! Massively inefficient! > D > It's almost enough to make one think that Bill Gates was getting a/ > per-tag commission from the W3C or something.  >   G Speculation that MS bloatware drives hardware upgrades is not new, but  ? my theory here is that BG is getting commission from bandwidth  H providers. FP is not the only culprit, as anyone using a text only mail  reader can easily tell.    --  
 Paul Sture  - OS X: "It's Unix, Jim, but not as we know it"    ------------------------------  # Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:26:48 GMT ! From: Nigel Barker <nigel@hp.com>  Subject: Re: Front page strikes 8 Message-ID: <gpsjh05atsonj8u4ctcodgc2268gal5l86@4ax.com>  N Your Front Page guy has got something misconfigured. It should be transferring .HTM & .HTML files as ASCII.    H In Front Page go to Tools->Options->FTP->Extensions to transfer as ASCII  J There is a long list of file extensions & then a box on the right with the instructions:-  L "Customize this list by adding your own extensions. Any extension not on the$ list will be transferred as binary."  L I just checked with Front Page & my SWS V1.3 web server & it definitely does transfer .HTM files as ASCII.    -- Nigel Barker Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur    ------------------------------    Date: 11 Aug 2004 07:25:25 -0500; From: koehler@eisner.nospam.encompasserve.org (Bob Koehler)  Subject: Re: Front page strikes 3 Message-ID: <Es19KWUhO6OB@eisner.encompasserve.org>   B In article <04081013564828@antinode.org>, sms@antinode.org writes:  D >    My experience with FrontPage is nil, but I assume that it has aI > built-in FTP upload feature to send the local copies of files up to the H > Web server via FTP, and that it works with other servers, and that theD > users don't want to change their procedure to accomodate VMS.  But > that's just an assumption.  D    Sounds like it's got a broken FTP client.  Common.  "Good enough"     for Windows and UNIX servers.   ------------------------------    Date: 11 Aug 2004 07:07:04 -0700& From: jordan@ccs4vms.com (Rich Jordan) Subject: Re: Front page strikes = Message-ID: <cc5619f2.0408110607.2ef471ee@posting.google.com>   a Nigel Barker <nigel@hp.com> wrote in message news:<gpsjh05atsonj8u4ctcodgc2268gal5l86@4ax.com>... P > Your Front Page guy has got something misconfigured. It should be transferring > .HTM & .HTML files as ASCII.   > J > In Front Page go to Tools->Options->FTP->Extensions to transfer as ASCII > L > There is a long list of file extensions & then a box on the right with the > instructions:- > N > "Customize this list by adding your own extensions. Any extension not on the& > list will be transferred as binary." > N > I just checked with Front Page & my SWS V1.3 web server & it definitely does > transfer .HTM files as ASCII.    Nigel,D      thanks for responding.  The developer is using FP2000, and thatE option does not seem to exist; certainly not under the tools->options ? or tools->page options.  I'm having him check through any other A possibilities for that level of configurability.  Are you perhaps . providing info from a version other than 2000?  
 Thanks again.    Rich   ------------------------------  # Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:36:46 GMT ! From: Nigel Barker <nigel@hp.com>  Subject: Re: Front page strikes 8 Message-ID: <m2bkh0lbr5iu86s043hlpabu4ovhtprgrr@4ax.com>  F On 11 Aug 2004 07:07:04 -0700, jordan@ccs4vms.com (Rich Jordan) wrote:  b >Nigel Barker <nigel@hp.com> wrote in message news:<gpsjh05atsonj8u4ctcodgc2268gal5l86@4ax.com>...Q >> Your Front Page guy has got something misconfigured. It should be transferring   >> .HTM & .HTML files as ASCII.  >>  K >> In Front Page go to Tools->Options->FTP->Extensions to transfer as ASCII  >>  M >> There is a long list of file extensions & then a box on the right with the  >> instructions:-  >>  O >> "Customize this list by adding your own extensions. Any extension not on the ' >> list will be transferred as binary."  >>  O >> I just checked with Front Page & my SWS V1.3 web server & it definitely does   >> transfer .HTM files as ASCII. >  >Nigel, E >     thanks for responding.  The developer is using FP2000, and that F >option does not seem to exist; certainly not under the tools->options@ >or tools->page options.  I'm having him check through any otherB >possibilities for that level of configurability.  Are you perhaps/ >providing info from a version other than 2000?   K I don't normally use Front Page so I just checked on one of my PCs that had N Front Page 2003 i.e. the latest version. It looks like the fault is with FrontH Page as I guess that this new option has been provided as it didn't work properly in FP 2000.  L You can always manually copy over the files using another PC FTP client thatO behaves correctly e.g. WS_FTP or FlashFXP although these aren't integrated into  Front Page.    -- Nigel Barker Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur    ------------------------------  # Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:48:30 GMT ! From: Nigel Barker <nigel@hp.com>  Subject: Re: Front page strikes 8 Message-ID: <r4ckh05vlk5n8qt1tsode9qnd0aioni01l@4ax.com>  D On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:36:46 GMT, Nigel Barker <nigel@hp.com> wrote:  G >On 11 Aug 2004 07:07:04 -0700, jordan@ccs4vms.com (Rich Jordan) wrote:  > c >>Nigel Barker <nigel@hp.com> wrote in message news:<gpsjh05atsonj8u4ctcodgc2268gal5l86@4ax.com>... R >>> Your Front Page guy has got something misconfigured. It should be transferring! >>> .HTM & .HTML files as ASCII.   >>> L >>> In Front Page go to Tools->Options->FTP->Extensions to transfer as ASCII >>> N >>> There is a long list of file extensions & then a box on the right with the >>> instructions:- >>> P >>> "Customize this list by adding your own extensions. Any extension not on the( >>> list will be transferred as binary." >>> P >>> I just checked with Front Page & my SWS V1.3 web server & it definitely does! >>> transfer .HTM files as ASCII.  >> >>Nigel,F >>     thanks for responding.  The developer is using FP2000, and thatG >>option does not seem to exist; certainly not under the tools->options A >>or tools->page options.  I'm having him check through any other C >>possibilities for that level of configurability.  Are you perhaps 0 >>providing info from a version other than 2000? > L >I don't normally use Front Page so I just checked on one of my PCs that hadO >Front Page 2003 i.e. the latest version. It looks like the fault is with Front I >Page as I guess that this new option has been provided as it didn't work  >properly in FP 2000.  > M >You can always manually copy over the files using another PC FTP client that P >behaves correctly e.g. WS_FTP or FlashFXP although these aren't integrated into >Front Page.  P Another thought. You could set up WebDAV on the Apache server & then just drag &M drop files if that is easier. DAV is Distributed Authoring & Versioning which O has a lot of functionality in terms of code management but in this case you can N just use it like a "Poor Man's Pathworks" to give you access to a directory onP the VMS system as though it were a local folder on the PC. Files copied into theL DAV directory will be in StreamLF format rather than the screwed up 512 byte0 fixed records caused by the binary FTP transfer.    M In FP 2003 there is an option to choose between different publication methods D (FTP, Sharepoint, DAV etc). Does something similar exist in FP 2000?   -- Nigel Barker Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur    ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 08:17:55 -0700 # From: "Tom Linden" <tom@kednos.com>  Subject: RE: Front page strikes 9 Message-ID: <NDEMLKKEBOIFBMJLCECIEEGNDKAA.tom@kednos.com>    < -----Original Message-----* < From: Nigel Barker [mailto:nigel@hp.com]* < Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 7:49 AM < To: Info-VAX@Mvb.Saic.Com ! < Subject: Re: Front page strikes  <  < F < On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:36:46 GMT, Nigel Barker <nigel@hp.com> wrote: < I < >On 11 Aug 2004 07:07:04 -0700, jordan@ccs4vms.com (Rich Jordan) wrote:  < > 1 < >>Nigel Barker <nigel@hp.com> wrote in message  6 < news:<gpsjh05atsonj8u4ctcodgc2268gal5l86@4ax.com>...> < >>> Your Front Page guy has got something misconfigured. It  < should be transferring# < >>> .HTM & .HTML files as ASCII.   < >>> = < >>> In Front Page go to Tools->Options->FTP->Extensions to   < transfer as ASCII  < >>> B < >>> There is a long list of file extensions & then a box on the  < right with the < >>> instructions:- < >>> > < >>> "Customize this list by adding your own extensions. Any  < extension not on the* < >>> list will be transferred as binary." < >>> C < >>> I just checked with Front Page & my SWS V1.3 web server & it   < definitely does # < >>> transfer .HTM files as ASCII.  < >>
 < >>Nigel,H < >>     thanks for responding.  The developer is using FP2000, and thatI < >>option does not seem to exist; certainly not under the tools->options C < >>or tools->page options.  I'm having him check through any other E < >>possibilities for that level of configurability.  Are you perhaps 2 < >>providing info from a version other than 2000? < > B < >I don't normally use Front Page so I just checked on one of my  < PCs that hadD < >Front Page 2003 i.e. the latest version. It looks like the fault  < is with Front K < >Page as I guess that this new option has been provided as it didn't work  < >properly in FP 2000.   K I just checked and under the files tab there is a Publish Web option, but I E think you need to have Active Server enabled, which seems to preclude E Apache compatibility.  Under the help menu enter "enable publish web"  < > D < >You can always manually copy over the files using another PC FTP 
 < client that C < >behaves correctly e.g. WS_FTP or FlashFXP although these aren't   < integrated into  < >Front Page. < B < Another thought. You could set up WebDAV on the Apache server &  < then just drag &? < drop files if that is easier. DAV is Distributed Authoring &   < Versioning which@ < has a lot of functionality in terms of code management but in  < this case you can D < just use it like a "Poor Man's Pathworks" to give you access to a  < directory onC < the VMS system as though it were a local folder on the PC. Files   < copied into the C < DAV directory will be in StreamLF format rather than the screwed  
 < up 512 byte 2 < fixed records caused by the binary FTP transfer. <  < < < In FP 2003 there is an option to choose between different  < publication methods F < (FTP, Sharepoint, DAV etc). Does something similar exist in FP 2000? <  < -- < Nigel Barker! < Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur  <  < --- ( < Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.< < Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).A < Version: 6.0.735 / Virus Database: 489 - Release Date: 8/6/2004  <  --- & Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.: Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).? Version: 6.0.735 / Virus Database: 489 - Release Date: 8/6/2004    ------------------------------  # Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:05:32 GMT ' From: Michael Fraley <fraley@usfca.edu> / Subject: Help- sysadmin support recommendations < Message-ID: <slrnchkddb.10v.fraley@cumquat.ca.sprintbbd.net>  G Can anyone provide leads for sysadmin support? We need a backup for our G fulltime sysadmin when she's on vacation. We run a 3-node Alpha OpenVMS 1 cluster. Can you recommend any providers? Thanks!    --       Michael Fraley   fraley@usfca.edu   http://www.usfca.edu/~fraley   ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 02:26:59 -0400   From: John Santos <JOHN@egh.com>3 Subject: Re: How far back does SYI$_MAIN_MEMORY go? 5 Message-ID: <1040811012824.4244B-100000@Ives.egh.com>   % On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Guy Peleg wrote:    > John,  > @ > The SYI$_MAIN_MEMORY item code has been added in October 1995.= > Out of curiosity, what did not work with the MACRO routine?  > < > All that required is to get the content of SCH$GL_FREECNT.= > On V8.2 you need to use SCH$GI_FREECNT (due to the 50bit-VA  > changes).  >  > Guy    Guy,   Thanks for the info.  : I got an undefined symbol for SCH$GL_FREECNT at link time.  8 Is SCH$GI_FREECNT larger than a longword?  Appendix D of9 the V5.2 Internals & Data Structures book (latest version : I happen to have handy) says datatype "I" is "Reserved for; integer extensions"  (Later... The V1.5 Alpha I&DS says the 7 same thing, as does the V7.3 "Guide to Creating OpenVMS 2 Modular Procedures".)  Not sure what this means...  ; If the maximum free memory size (in pages) exceeds 32 bits, ; then SYI$_MAIN_MEMORY will break, too, since it only allows 7 8 hex digits (a longword) for each field.  Maybe that's  why you didn't document it? :-)   9 Anyway, I think 1995 is far enough back to not bother me.     / > "John Santos" <JOHN@egh.com> wrote in message 1 > news:1040810012654.4244I-100000@Ives.egh.com...  > > F > > I'm porting some software to IA64.  (Almost all of it was changingE > > "If this isn't an Alpha, it must be a VAX" statements to "If this I > > isn't a VAX, then it must be either an Alpha or an IA64, don't really I > > care which", which took about 3-4 hours.  Would have been faster with 
 > > TECO :-()  > > G > > The one thing that wouldn't port was a 3 line MACRO subroutine that C > > gets the amount of free memory on the system (a sanity check to G > > prevent the program from grabbing so much memory that it pagefaults G > > to death.)  I replaced it with a little BASIC subroutine that calls E > > LIB$GETSYI to get "PAGE_SIZE" and "MAIN_MEMORY", and converts the  > > results to pagelets. > > E > > The MAIN_MEMORY item code isn't documented, except in the release C > > notes for the 7.3-1 DCL ECO V2.0, but the ECO notes say it "has 9 > > been available for a long time but never documented."  > > 7 > > I tried it on a VAX V7.1 system and it worked fine.  > > : > > Does anyone have an older system they can check it on? > > 0 > >   $ write sys$output f$getsyi("MAIN_MEMORY") > > @ > > should do the trick.  It produces a 32-character hex string,= > > with total, free, in use and modified page counts (as per ; > > "$ show memory/physical") jammed together as 4 unsigned  > > 8-digit hex numbers. > >  > >  > > ----> > > One huge advantage of this method is it doesn't need to be3 > > linked with sys.stb on VAX or /sysexe on Alpha.  > > < > > I couldn't find any VMS release notes old enough to tell> > > when SYS$GETSYI/F$GETSYI first appeared.  The Blue, Orange7 > > and Gray walls have all long since departed...  The = > > MAIN_MEMORY item code hasn't been documented anyway, so I = > > guess the only way to tell if it is there is to try it or . > > to look in STARLET.MLB for the definition. > > ? > > I'd rather not support the old macro routine (and the build ? > > and installation procedures for it) if the new method works C > > as far back as VMS V6.1 (VAX VMS 5.5 would be super; I'm fairly @ > > sure we don't have any customers running anything older thanB > > VMS 5.5-2, but I'm not sure about that version or the V6.x's.) > >  > > TIA  > >    --   John Santos  Evans Griffiths & Hart, Inc. 781-861-0670 ext 539   ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 02:55:57 -0400   From: John Santos <JOHN@egh.com>3 Subject: Re: How far back does SYI$_MAIN_MEMORY go? 5 Message-ID: <1040811025411.4244C-100000@Ives.egh.com>   " On 10 Aug 2004, Chris Doran wrote:  _ > John Santos <JOHN@egh.com> wrote in message news:<1040810012654.4244I-100000@Ives.egh.com>...  >   7 > > I tried it on a VAX V7.1 system and it worked fine.  > > : > > Does anyone have an older system they can check it on? > > 0 > >   $ write sys$output f$getsyi("MAIN_MEMORY") > >  > > should do the trick  > A > "%DCL-W-IVKEYW, unrecognized keyword..." in V6.2, VAX or Alpha.  >  > Bad luck, Chris   G Thanks Chris, Larry, Karl and Guy (and anyone else I might have missed)  for helping narrow this down.   E To summarize, right now it looks like it works on V7.1 and later, but ) not on 6.2 and earlier.  V7.0 is unknown.    --   John Santos  Evans Griffiths & Hart, Inc. 781-861-0670 ext 539   ------------------------------    Date: 11 Aug 2004 05:13:53 -0700. From: fabiopenvms@yahoo.com.br (Fabio Cardoso)+ Subject: IBM's mainframe momentum continues = Message-ID: <f30679fb.0408110413.33bb7fe3@posting.google.com>    Click   ^ http://news.com.com/IBM%27s+mainframe+momentum+continues/2100-7337_3-5304705.html?tag=nefd.top  C "In another sign the mainframe computer is coming back to life, IBM C plans to announce on Wednesday that a customer is using its zSeries F machines and Linux for a major consolidation of business applications.  D Endress+Hauser, which makes measuring devices for industrial processB engineering, is migrating its 19 SAP applications into one primaryC data center in Germany using two z990 mainframes, according to IBM. E With a total of 36 processors running the Linux operating system, the > setup is one of Europe's largest installations of Linux on the mainframe, IBM said.  D "Linux on the mainframe is ready for prime time," said Jim Goethals,B infrastructure simplification program manager at IBM. "It's real."  @ In the past, Endress+Hauser ran its SAP applications on multipleF computers using the Unix operating system, IBM said. Big Blue declinedF to disclose terms of the Endress+Hauser win. But a company spokeswoman> said a general starting price for a z990-class mainframe is $1 million.  ? A few years ago, the mainframe computer was widely considered a = dinosaur, but it is experiencing new demand thanks to factors B including better networking performance and strong virtualization,9 said Jonathan Eunice, analyst with researcher Illuminata. E Virtualization refers to the ability to run more than one instance of D an operating system on the same machine. IBM says its mainframes can+ run hundreds of "virtual" server computers.   A The Endress+Hauser win also indicates the open-source Linux OS is C gaining ground, Eunice said. "Linux is often attacked as 'great for F Web servers, but.' Clearly, that serious enterprises are interested inF putting their business computing on Linux is very significant," Eunice said.   C During each of the last three quarters, IBM's mainframe revenue has 5 grown more than 30 percent on a year-over-year basis.   F IBM's mainframes compete in part against Unix computers from companies9 such as Sun Microsystems, Hewlett-Packard and IBM itself.   F The mainframe stands out for excellent reliability, said Charles King,B analyst with the Sageza Group. "The mainframe is legendary for its? ability, statistically, to withstand any problem," King said. "    ------------------------------    Date: 11 Aug 2004 05:51:58 -07004 From: jignesh_vyas@hotmail.com (Jignesh Vyas 'Jigs')6 Subject: Re: Is it decnet problem or Thruway problem ?< Message-ID: <908a2e17.0408110451.63d686f@posting.google.com>  f David M Smith <dsmit115@csc.com> wrote in message news:<3cdvg0hurt4kvjfaockungdv82ru63djao@4ax.com>...N > On 2 Aug 2004 20:01:43 -0700, jignesh_vyas@hotmail.com (Jignesh Vyas 'Jigs') > wrote: > | > >Keith Cayemberg <keith.cayemberg@arcor.de> wrote in message news:<410e1947$0$7322$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net>... > >> Jignesh Vyas 'Jigs' wrote: 
 > >> . . . > >>	 >  [snip]  > >  > >Hi Keith, > > E > >Thanks for your information but my biggest problem is that I can't I > >touch SYSUAF at all, we have a seperate QA department for it and to do F > >any change in SYSUAF requires a long chain of approvals. :)  I just; > >saw one application called "jump" in freeware which says  > > B > >"JUMP allows a user to login exactly  as another user without a > >password.C > >It  also  allows a more restricted (non-exact) impersonation of  
 > >another	 > >user."  > R > Unfortunately, any program of this sort will require elevated VMS privileges forL > execution. I've looked at JUMP, and it requires CMEXEC, CMKRNL, DETACH (orL > IMPERSONATE), SYSNAM, SYSPRV. Similarly, HGLOGIN (which Martin recommends)' > appears to require SYSPRV and CMKRNL.  > R > If you do not have privilege to access SYSUAF, then you would not be able to use > these programs. K > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- K > David M. Smith 302.391.8533                       dsmit115 at csc dot com K > Computer Sciences Corporation     (Opinions are those of the writer only) K > -------------------------------------------------------------------------    David,  C I have a fully privilege account but due to policy issue i can't do E any modification on SYSUAF, so I think HGLOGIN could be a good choice  for me. 	 lets try.    -Jignesh Vyas 'Jigs'   ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:41:54 -0400 # From: "John Smith" <a@nonymous.com> 5 Subject: It's a pity they didn't survey OpenVMS users , Message-ID: <orCdndp1efLO0YfcRVn-vQ@igs.net>  F Evans Data recently provided more proof that Linux is more secure thanH Windows. The researchers surveyed 500 Linux developers and found that 92H percent had never had a machine affected by malicious code. Fewer than 7D percent said they'd been victims of three or more hacker intrusions.  8 Only 22 percent said their systems had ever been hacked.  	 ..more...   D http://www.securitypipeline.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=26805728     begin 666 blank.gif = K1TE&.#EA`0`!`( ``/___P```"'Y! $`````+ `````!``$```("1 $`.P``  `  end    ------------------------------   Date: 11 Aug 2004 17:16:39 GMT( From: bill@cs.uofs.edu (Bill Gunshannon)9 Subject: Re: It's a pity they didn't survey OpenVMS users * Message-ID: <2nv2jnF55l6pU2@uni-berlin.de>  , In article <orCdndp1efLO0YfcRVn-vQ@igs.net>,& 	"John Smith" <a@nonymous.com> writes: > H > Evans Data recently provided more proof that Linux is more secure thanJ > Windows. The researchers surveyed 500 Linux developers and found that 92J > percent had never had a machine affected by malicious code. Fewer than 7F > percent said they'd been victims of three or more hacker intrusions. > : > Only 22 percent said their systems had ever been hacked. >  > ..more...  > F > http://www.securitypipeline.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=26805728 >  >   F That would require knowing about VMS but we all know the current mottoD of HP's VMS Marketing Div. is "I could tell you about VMS but then I would have to kill you."   bill   --  J Bill Gunshannon          |  de-moc-ra-cy (di mok' ra see) n.  Three wolvesD bill@cs.scranton.edu     |  and a sheep voting on what's for dinner. University of Scranton   |A Scranton, Pennsylvania   |         #include <std.disclaimer.h>       ------------------------------    Date: 11 Aug 2004 07:01:12 -0700. From: fabiopenvms@yahoo.com.br (Fabio Cardoso) Subject: Re: LAVC/SCA Traffic = Message-ID: <f30679fb.0408110504.2dbe9aa5@posting.google.com>   ] "Richard Brodie" <R.Brodie@rl.ac.uk> wrote in message news:<cfavcj$r1i@newton.cc.rl.ac.uk>... Z > "Barry Treahy, Jr." <Treahy@MMaz.com> wrote in message news:4118FE3E.9040802@MMaz.com...D > > Anyone have a doc, or reference point, for the packet layout forL > > LAVC/SCA traffic?  I have some captured packets and would like to decode > > them...  > D > There is some data in one of the appendices to the cluster manual.  H This list talks a lot about Cluster Traffic ! Isnt time to the OpenVMS ? engineering group ask for development of a tool to measure it ? 0 May be the HP OpenView eng. group can help it !    Regards    FC   ------------------------------  % Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 00:41:32 +0800 , From: Paul Repacholi <prep@prep.synonet.com> Subject: Re: LAVC/SCA Traffic 0 Message-ID: <87wu05sk3n.fsf@k9.prep.synonet.com>  0 fabiopenvms@yahoo.com.br (Fabio Cardoso) writes:  _ > "Richard Brodie" <R.Brodie@rl.ac.uk> wrote in message news:<cfavcj$r1i@newton.cc.rl.ac.uk>... [ >> "Barry Treahy, Jr." <Treahy@MMaz.com> wrote in message news:4118FE3E.9040802@MMaz.com...   E >> > Anyone have a doc, or reference point, for the packet layout for M >> > LAVC/SCA traffic?  I have some captured packets and would like to decode  >> > them...   E >> There is some data in one of the appendices to the cluster manual.   J > This list talks a lot about Cluster Traffic ! Isnt time to the OpenVMS A > engineering group ask for development of a tool to measure it ? 2 > May be the HP OpenView eng. group can help it !   A AMDS will do that, but it is a bit obscure to use. Select Cluster F Transition, select the node and select SCA display, and from there you! can also get to the NISCS screen.   A Also SHOW CLUSTER/CONT with added data. What is lacking is a good : explanation of what you are looking at, and what it means.   --  < Paul Repacholi                               1 Crescent Rd.,7 +61 (08) 9257-1001                           Kalamunda. @                                              West Australia 6076* comp.os.vms,- The Older, Grumpier Slashdot. Raw, Cooked or Well-done, it's all half baked.F EPIC, The Architecture of the future, always has been, always will be.   ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:04:45 +0000 - From: David B Sneddon <dbsneddon@bigpond.com> $ Subject: Re: MPlayer is a DVD player* Message-ID: <411A0B5D.7080704@bigpond.com>  # Mark Berryman was overheard to say: F > Do any of you who downloaded MPlayer for your VMS system have a DVD J > drive attached to it?  I'd like to hear how well MPlayer plays DVDs for E > you.  (Note that the default name for the DVD device compiled into  K > MPlayer is DQA0.  You must explicitly specify the DVD device if yours is  H > not DQA0.  The syntax will be: mplayer -dvd-device dkaNNN: dvd:// and & > the device must be mounted foreign). >  > Mark Berryman   B I have a machine with DVD player/writer and tried to use it but it0 complains about not finding MMOV in sys$library.C I have MMOV V2.2 installed but there is no MMOV.EXE in sys$library. + What version of MMOV was it linked against?    Regards, Dave.  --  I David B Sneddon (dbs)    VMS Systems Programmer     dbsneddon@bigpond.com I Sneddo's quick guide ...          http://www.users.bigpond.com/dbsneddon/ I DBS freeware at ...   http://www.users.bigpond.com/dbsneddon/software.htm I "Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans" Lennon    ------------------------------  # Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 07:48:00 GMT 6 From: "Kenneth Farmer" <kfarmer@NOSPAM.spyderbyte.com>< Subject: Re: Need assistance for OpenVMS trade press article@ Message-ID: <QakSc.249082$2o2.14526341@twister.southeast.rr.com>  0 Let's add an additional option for the reporter:   5) Someone using CHARON-VAX   
 Thanks Barry.    Ken    -- Kenneth R. Farmer <><  OpenVMS.org     " "Kenneth Farmer" wrote in message:L > I've been approached by a writer from one of the large trade publications.4 > He has asked for assistance finding the following: > 2 > 1) A user who currently is using VMS on Itanium.A > 2) Someone who is on Alpha and not planning to move to Itanium. C > 3) Someone still on VAX and not planning to change any time soon. : > 4) Someone who was on VMS, went elsewhere and came back. > L > If you wish to be interview please reply to kfarmer (at) openvms (dot) org > with: 	 > 1) Name  > 2) Email address > 3) Company name 9 > 4) Number associated with your situation (1, 2, 3 or 4) G > 5) Your phone number.  I'm going to call everyone first before I pass  their  > name on to the writer. > G > Your geographic location doesn't matter.  Being able to speak English  does.  > :) > J > Obviously this information will be made public through the interview, soG > make sure your company approves, otherwise I'm not responsible if you  loose  > your job.  > @ > Deadline to respond is End-of-Business, Thursday, August 12th. >  > -- > Kenneth R. Farmer <>< 
 > OpenVMS.org  >  >  >    ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:48:55 +0200  From: Lars <lars@post.cz> < Subject: Re: Need assistance for OpenVMS trade press article0 Message-ID: <cfdjq9$pbc$1@new-usenet.uk.sun.com>   Kenneth Farmer wrote: 2 > Let's add an additional option for the reporter: >  > 5) Someone using CHARON-VAX   E SIMH users do not qualify? :-)) Needs to use expensive solutions? :-)    J.   ------------------------------   Date: 11 Aug 2004 17:12:48 GMT( From: bill@cs.uofs.edu (Bill Gunshannon)< Subject: Re: Need assistance for OpenVMS trade press article* Message-ID: <2nv2cgF55l6pU1@uni-berlin.de>  0 In article <cfdjq9$pbc$1@new-usenet.uk.sun.com>, 	Lars <lars@post.cz> writes: >  >  > Kenneth Farmer wrote:l3 >> Let's add an additional option for the reporter:e >> k >> 5) Someone using CHARON-VAX > G > SIMH users do not qualify? :-)) Needs to use expensive solutions? :-)  >   C SIMH is not a supported platform.  Trade press is not interested in 5 people who play with OSes, only serious business use.E   bill   --  J Bill Gunshannon          |  de-moc-ra-cy (di mok' ra see) n.  Three wolvesD bill@cs.scranton.edu     |  and a sheep voting on what's for dinner. University of Scranton   |A Scranton, Pennsylvania   |         #include <std.disclaimer.h>   a   ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:27:39 -0700a+ From: "Barry Treahy, Jr." <Treahy@MMaz.com>d< Subject: Re: Need assistance for OpenVMS trade press article' Message-ID: <411A570B.7090202@MMaz.com>    Lars wrote:P   >i >  > Kenneth Farmer wrote:a >n3 >> Let's add an additional option for the reporter:n >> >> 5) Someone using CHARON-VAX >n >eG > SIMH users do not qualify? :-)) Needs to use expensive solutions? :-)- >-H I suspect that expense isn't the issue, but being a commerical solution  is, which SIMH is not...   Barryc   -- p  > Barry Treahy, Jr                       E-mail: Treahy@MMaz.com> Midwest Microwave                          Phone: 480/314-1320> Vice President & CIO                         FAX: 480/661-7028                        A   ------------------------------    Date: 11 Aug 2004 07:23:15 -0500; From: koehler@eisner.nospam.encompasserve.org (Bob Koehler)t* Subject: Re: ssh on HP TCP/IP Services 5.43 Message-ID: <wZSBIiEzpVuF@eisner.encompasserve.org>l  i In article <al8Sc.904$Ny6.1993@mencken.net.nih.gov>, "Jonathan Boswell" <jsb.NOSP@M.cdrh.fda.gov> writes:mJ > "Bob Koehler" <koehler@eisner.nospam.encompasserve.org> wrote in message/ > news:DwyrH8+xoFIy@eisner.encompasserve.org... G >>    Second of all, support for X11 tunneling via TCP/IP Services' SSH0C >>    is abysmal.  Wait until it's fixed, or get a better IP stack.  >  > Works for me..  C    You're the first poster I've read to claim that.  You experienceuE    with HP's stack matches my experience with Multinet.  Just use it,I    it works.   ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:35:35 +0100n& From: Elliott Roper <nospam@yrl.co.uk>L Subject: Re: TECO manual location, was: Re: [Somewhat OT] What your non-OVMS1 Message-ID: <110820041335355039%nospam@yrl.co.uk>:  B In article <chlSc.239510$%_6.16288@attbi_s01>, glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote:s   > Scott wrote: > < > > David B Sneddon <dbsneddon@bigpond.com> wrote in message* > > news:<4115A07A.8050401@bigpond.com>... > > I > >>What you need to do is have some offspring and teach them in the ways>5 > >>of Teco, to carry on the tradition -- like I did.S >  > > $ TECO CHILD1 > > *<FStv$teco$;>Ia love of obscure editors$ex$$.H > > $ SPAWN CHILD/NOWAIT/OUTPUT=TREASURED_MEMORIES/INPUT=OLD_VAX_STORIES >  > Shouldn't that beS >  > MAKE CHILD   Not WMD?   --  A I thought I would be the last on earth to mung my e-mail address.  fsnospam$elliott$$   ------------------------------    Date: 11 Aug 2004 10:01:09 -0700/ From: johnhreinhardt@yahoo.com (John Reinhardt)a9 Subject: Re: Using Fibrechannel on a Personal Workstationo= Message-ID: <5d708ac7.0408110901.66492bab@posting.google.com>d  f "John E. Malmberg" <wb8tyw@qsl.network> wrote in message news:<F4GdnYZ6xLEcFoTcRVn-tA@adelphia.com>... > Malcolm Dunnett wrote:H > >  I'm building a 2 node cluster consisting of a DS10L and a PWS600a, H > > each of them connected to an MA2200 raid array on a switched fabric.@ > > All disks (including the system disk) are on the raid array. > > F > >  This is no problem for the DS10L as its console firmware supportsJ > > booting via fibre channel. The firmware on the PWS600a doesn't though,G > > in fact the console doesn't even see the FC adapter ( KGPSA ) othert7 > > than as a series of cryptic codes in "SHOW CONFIG".f > >   D You got further than I did then. I have a PWS500au that once I put aE KGPSA-BC (LP7000E) into promptly refused to boot and in fact the BIOStD printed out a message telling me to remove the unsupported card from the PCI bus.   > K > The KGPSA has not been tested with the PWS600a, so it is totally unknown n$ > if there is any incompatibilities. >   D I had also been told this by a HP (DEC/Compaq) employee "friend of aC friend" but I had to try it out anyway. Unfortunately for me he wasr$ correct - at least for the PWS500au.  F > Such problems may only show up under extreme stress, so for a hobby  > operation, it may work fine. >    > -John  > wb8tyw@qsl.network > Personal Opinion Only,   John H. Reinhardt    ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:19:42 -0400 2 From: "Stanley F. Quayle" <squayle@insight.rr.com>" Subject: Re: VMS 5.0 or 5.1 needed. Message-ID: <411A1CEE.14340.EC189D7@localhost>  D John A. Dundas III was able to send me the V5.0 installation disk.  B However, the upgrade doesn't complete, since it wants a Mandatory  Update installed.n  : Anyone have that?  Or is there a way to bypass the Update?  
 --Stan Quayley Quayle Consulting Inc.  
 ----------- Stanley F. Quayle, P.E. N8SQ  +1 614-868-1363 3 8572 North Spring Ct., Pickerington, OH  43147  USAe0 stan-at-stanq-dot-com       http://www.stanq.com   ------------------------------   End of INFO-VAX 2004.443 ************************