1 INFO-VAX	Fri, 13 Aug 2004	Volume 2004 : Issue 446       Contents:: Re: AlphaServer 4100 confused about how much memory it has Contrast and compare - Dell  Re: Exending console timeout?  Re: Exending console timeout?  Fiorina under fire Re: Front page strikes+ Re: HP servers management shakeup happening + Re: HP servers management shakeup happening + Re: HP servers management shakeup happening + Re: HP servers management shakeup happening + Re: HP servers management shakeup happening + Re: HP servers management shakeup happening ) Interex: Fiorina Ousts Three Senior Execs - Re: Interex: Fiorina Ousts Three Senior Execs  Re: LAVC/SCA Traffic Re: LAVC/SCA Traffic Meet the new faces - Re: MPlayer is a DVD player 3 Re: PWIP driver won't start on TCPIP 5.4 after ECO2 ' Re: Rejecting network access to service   F ----------------------------------------------------------------------  + Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 19:57:47 +0000 (UTC) 7 From: moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) C Subject: Re: AlphaServer 4100 confused about how much memory it has ( Message-ID: <cfgi3r$sr4$1@pcls4.std.com>  ( chessmaster1010@hotmail.com (JG) writes:   >SDA>clue config >System Configuration: >--------------------- >System Information:E >System Type    AlphaServer 4100 5/533 4MB             Primary CPU ID  >00 E >Cycle Time     1.8 nsec (531 MHz)                     Pagesize       
 >8192 Byte   >Memory Configuration:D >Cluster    PFN Start    PFN Count         Range (MByte)       UsageF > #01             0          256         0.0 MB -    2.0 MB    ConsoleE > #02           256       147200         2.0 MB - 1152.0 MB    System E > #03        262144        16384      2048.0 MB - 2176.0 MB    System E > #04        393216        16381      3072.0 MB - 3199.9 MB    System F > #05        409597            3      3199.9 MB - 3200.0 MB    Console  A >You would think VMS would crash when it tried to access all that G >non-existant memory, but the system's been running fine for hours now.   E The CLUE CONFIG looks correct for a system with noncontiguous memory. F You have noncontiguous memory because the console spaces memory by theH size of the first memory option (which is why you have to install memoryG in order of decreasing (not increasing) size).  Since the second memory I card is smaller than the first, and the third starts at a multiple of the G size of the first, there is a gap of the difference in size.  Same for   the fourth module.  J Obviously the show memory output is incorrect, but that may be because youB are running such an old version, possibly without full support of D noncontiguous memory (maybe only latent support).  I don't know when# noncontiguous memory was supported.    >Should I worry about it?   I Find out if noncontiguous memory was supported (and there is simply a bug J in SHOW MEMORY's output) or not, if not, worry.  Better yet, just upgrade.     --   -Mike    ------------------------------  % Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 17:20:12 -0400 # From: "John Smith" <a@nonymous.com> $ Subject: Contrast and compare - Dell, Message-ID: <3f6dnX5Txp2SQobcRVn-sw@igs.net>   John Smith wrote: ? > http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB109231043670389677,00.html  >  > H-P Posts Weak Results,  > Shakes Up Storage Unit > + > A WALL STREET JOURNAL ONLINE NEWS ROUNDUP  > August 12, 2004 8:42 a.m.  > F > Hewlett-Packard Co. said its net income nearly doubled in the recentE > quarter but missed analysts' expectations, amid poor performance in @ > its unit that sells corporate servers and storage systems. The8 > company plans to shake up management in that division. > C > The company said other divisions -- including personal computers, F > software, services and printers -- performed well, but those resultsD > were eclipsed by "management missteps" in the enterprise business. > H > The Palo Alto, Calif., computer company also forecast earnings for theE > current quarter, excluding items, below Wall Street's expectations.  > C > The results and forecast were announced before the markets opened H > Thursday. The company had been expected to report its results Aug. 18. > F > For the fiscal third quarter ended July 31, Hewlett-Packard reportedG > it earned $586 million, or 19 cents a share, up from $297 million, or B > 10 cents a share, a year earlier. Before items, earnings were 24E > cents a share, below the 31 cents a share forecast by Thomson First  > Call's survey of analysts. > E > H-P's fiscal third-quarter revenue rose 8.9% to $18.89 billion from F > $17.35 billion last year. However, a First Call survey had projected& > $19.01 billion in quarterly revenue. > E > In a statement on the "preliminary" third-quarter results Thursday, B > Chief Executive Carly Fiorina said satisfactory performance at a> > number of H-P's businesses was overshadowed by "unacceptable> > execution" at the enterprise servers and storage unit, whereC > third-quarter revenue of $3.4 billion was down 5% from last year.  > E > "We therefore are making immediate management changes," Ms. Fiorina G > added. "We are also accelerating our margin improvement plans in this @ > business. With these changes, we expect our server and storageA > business to return to profitability in the fourth quarter." She 1 > didn't immediately outline the personnel moves.  > G > For the fourth quarter, H-P expects earnings, excluding charges, will F > be 35 cents to 39 cents a share on revenue of $21.0 billion to $21.5G > billion. Analysts were expecting earnings of 43 cents a share for the 
 > quarter. > G > Hewlett-Packard said several factors combined to crimp revenue at its A > server and storage unit. The company said the U.S. business was @ > disrupted by a move to a new order-processing and supply-chainG > system. In Europe, results were affected by issues related to channel > > compensation, overly aggressive discounting, and a move to aE > centralized claims process, the company said. Also, Hewlett-Packard 2 > said, its storage business performed below plan. > @ > Amid the drop in server and storage revenue, Hewlett-Packard'sG > personal-systems unit reported third-quarter revenue of $5.9 billion, G > up 19%; imaging and printing revenue was $5.6 billion, up 8%; and the 6 > services arm posted $3.5 billion in revenue, up 12%. >  > --- A > I wonder which heads are going to roll? And which products too.    --------------------  = http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB109216032520987687,00.html    Dell's Profit Climbs 29% On Strong Demand for PCs  ) A WALL STREET JOURNAL ONLINE NEWS ROUNDUP  August 12, 2004 4:56 p.m.   I Dell Inc.'s profit rose 29%, boosted by a surge in shipments overseas and  strong demand for its servers.  J The Round Rock, Texas, computer giant reported net income of $799 million,F or 31 cents a share, for its fiscal second quarter ended July 30. ThatH compares with a profit of $621 million, or 24 cents a share, in the same quarter last year.  F Revenue jumped to $11.71 billion, up 20% $9.78 billion a year earlier.  K Dell last month boosted its second-quarter forecast to earnings of 31 cents I a share from May's target of 29 cents, citing "robust" enterprise systems : and services sales and market-share gains outside the U.S.  K The results were in line with analysts' expectations, according to a survey  by Thomson First Call.  J Global product shipments rose 19%, led by a 30% jump in Europe, the MiddleH East and Africa. Asia-Pacific and Japan had a 28% increase in shipments.  L Server shipments increased 31% and notebook shipments rose 28%. Revenue fromG software and peripheral products climbed 31%, driven by printer demand.   H Chief Executive Kevin Rollins said third-quarter shipments should be 21%L higher than a year ago, and expects net income for the quarter of 33 cents aL share, a 27% increase from a year earlier. Dell expects revenue to climb 18% to about $12.5 billion.   L Earlier Thursday, rival Hewlett-Packard Co. reported lower-than-expected netI income and issued a weak earnings outlook, citing lukewarm demand for its  corporate products.   F Earlier this year, Dell surpassed H-P as the world's largest seller ofJ notebook computers. H-P had held the top spot since its purchase of Compaq Computer in 2002.       
 -------------   L Dell generates about 45% more profit on 60% of the sales HP has, in a marketK segment (mostly PC's) where competition is cut-throat and margins are small   C Dell doesn't advertise spacement loping down the highway or invokes J nostalgia for 60's and 70's when we got stoned and went to 'Who' concerts.+ Dell advertises all their products instead.   L Maybe the HP Board ought to hire somebody from Proctor & Gamble or Coca-ColaH if all they are really attempting to be is a box pusher. At least people# from those companies know the game.    ------------------------------    Date: 12 Aug 2004 17:21:38 -0700% From: tadamsmar@yahoo.com (Tom Adams) & Subject: Re: Exending console timeout?= Message-ID: <ea44f5a1.0408121621.2949ee28@posting.google.com>   Y "Hank Vander Waal" <hvanderw@comcast.net> wrote in message news:<6237001@MVB.SAIC.COM>...  > What kind of console is it?? >  > VT terminal ???    Graphics console, X-terminal   >  > -----Original Message-----/ > From: Tom Adams [mailto:tadamsmar@yahoo.com]  ) > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 9:23 AM  > To: Info-VAX@Mvb.Saic.Com $ > Subject: Exending console timeout? > F > Is there any way to increase the console timeout so that the consoleG > will not go blank if there is no keyboard or mouse activity for a few 
 > minutes?   ------------------------------  % Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 19:44:39 -0700  From: Z <z@no.spam> & Subject: Re: Exending console timeout?0 Message-ID: <10hoaopju6p5666@corp.supernews.com>   Tom Adams wrote:F > Is there any way to increase the console timeout so that the consoleG > will not go blank if there is no keyboard or mouse activity for a few 
 > minutes?  . There's a screen saver setting on the Desktop.  = IIRC, click on the icon with the mouse (lower right hand side * of CDE) and find the screen icon in there.   ------------------------------    Date: 12 Aug 2004 20:12:16 -0700) From: baby_p_nut2@yahoo.com (Baby Peanut)  Subject: Fiorina under fire < Message-ID: <96d83290.0408121912.80b6f8b@posting.google.com>  A http://money.cnn.com/2004/08/12/technology/techinvestor/lamonica/   = << Fiorina might now have to wonder about her job security >>    ------------------------------  # Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 18:12:34 GMT ! From: Nigel Barker <nigel@hp.com>  Subject: Re: Front page strikes 8 Message-ID: <9gcnh01ecpusme40f28umj6g92lpu4qnb2@4ax.com>  K On 12 AUG 2004 14:02:23 GMT, karcher@thuria.waisman.wisc.edu (Carl Karcher)  wrote:  F >In a previous article, Nigel Barker <nigel@hp.dontspxmhim.com> wrote: >  >->...O >->You can always manually copy over the files using another PC FTP client that R >->behaves correctly e.g. WS_FTP or FlashFXP although these aren't integrated into >->Front Page. > J >I've yet to find a PC ftp client (including WS_FTP) that can handle (i.e.M >doesn't choke on) the ^ "escape" character used in extended ODS-5 filenames.   N It shouldn't be a problem with uploading _to_ VMS but I agree if you ever wantO to copy files back it can be awkward. This would be another good reason to take N up my previous suggestion & use WebDAV for transferring files to/from OpenVMS.   -- Nigel Barker Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur    ------------------------------    Date: 12 Aug 2004 11:46:04 -07003 From: bbfmetalworking@comcast.net (BBFMETALWORKING) 4 Subject: Re: HP servers management shakeup happening= Message-ID: <ce79441f.0408121046.3a0e73f6@posting.google.com>   C Nice job HP.  Fiorina seems to be destroying shareholder value like  she did at Lucent.? CPQ used to dominate the enterprise.  The HP merger seems to be  accelerating the slide.    ------------------------------    Date: 12 Aug 2004 13:09:55 -0700% From: whohe@whoever.com (DL Phillips) 4 Subject: Re: HP servers management shakeup happening= Message-ID: <af0dc2ea.0408121209.1ae9ae51@posting.google.com>   W "John Smith" <a@nonymous.com> wrote in message news:<ttednTGUPLO59obcRVn-ig@igs.net>...  <snip>A > with UNIX revenue up 8%, Alpha down 32%, and Non-stop down 25%.  <snip> > ------------------  - So Alpha is comparable to UNIX & Non-stop?;-)    > -----------------  > F > I'd be hard pressed to see VMS revenues up when Alpha sales are downJ > notwithstanding that new-fangled Intel 64-bit chip that's been nearly 15' > years in the making coming on-stream.   F Since I doubt that there are many new Tru64 sales, and I beleive Tru64F accounted for the majority of Alpha sales in the past, 32% sounds like@ it might leave room for an increase in VMS sales. But, I haven't  looked so that's just a thought.    Doug    ------------------------------  % Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 16:45:07 -0400 # From: "John Smith" <a@nonymous.com> 4 Subject: Re: HP servers management shakeup happening, Message-ID: <TcCdnecSl_JKS4bcRVn-jg@igs.net>   DL Phillips wrote:0 > "John Smith" <a@nonymous.com> wrote in message1 > news:<ttednTGUPLO59obcRVn-ig@igs.net>... <snip> B >> with UNIX revenue up 8%, Alpha down 32%, and Non-stop down 25%. > <snip> >> ------------------  > / > So Alpha is comparable to UNIX & Non-stop?;-)  >  >> ----------------- >>G >> I'd be hard pressed to see VMS revenues up when Alpha sales are down A >> notwithstanding that new-fangled Intel 64-bit chip that's been 2 >> nearly 15 years in the making coming on-stream. > H > Since I doubt that there are many new Tru64 sales, and I beleive Tru64H > accounted for the majority of Alpha sales in the past, 32% sounds likeB > it might leave room for an increase in VMS sales. But, I haven't" > looked so that's just a thought.      L If VMS sales have been up by double-digit increases the past few quarters asK has been alluded to by others, a collapse in Tru64 sales probably ought not L reduce Alpha sales by 32% if VMS sales were as robust this quarter as things" appeared a couple of quarters ago.  ! The other way to look at this is:   ; - Unix up 8% means Tru64 + HP-UX  irrespective of platform.   4 - Alpha down 32% means across VMS, Linux, and Tru64.  D - HP only advertises Linux, and Tru64 is 'the living dead' which fewF companies would buy additional systems of at this stage except to haveJ sufficient capacity to grow with their businesses as they manage their wayK through the little-endian to big-endian application & data porting exercise B before them, therefore my inference is that sales of VMS are down.   ------------------------------  % Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 17:31:45 -0400 * From: "Bill Todd" <billtodd@metrocast.net>4 Subject: Re: HP servers management shakeup happening2 Message-ID: <HL2dncgUwM7nfIbcRVn-tQ@metrocast.net>  . "John Smith" <a@nonymous.com> wrote in message& news:y9qdnaGg4qSh9YbcRVn-vw@igs.net...? > http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB109231043670389677,00.html    ...   I Right.  HP shares dropped to a low of $16.08 today, and rebounded only to C $16.95.  When you consider that 3 years ago (just before the merger L announcement) it was selling at around $24, yet another stunning endorsement of Carly's stewardship.   8 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/08/12/hp_q3_execs_out/  I "HP's much maligned PC division reported a 19 per cent rise in revenue to J $5.9bn. These gains, however, did little to boost the bottom line with theJ group reporting a profit of just $25m. Still, this is better than the loss1 of $56m reported in the same quarter a year ago."   1 Yup - another page right out of Curly's playbook.   ; http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/08/12/hp_blackmore_fired/   F And the reward for steadfast support of Carly is - you guessed it.  NoK sacrifice is too great for Carly to pay to try to obscure the fact that the & problems at HP start right at the top.  E "What problems," one might ask?  Well, cutting muscle in the mistaken J impression that it's no more significant than fat could be a major part of the answer:   6 http://www.byteandswitch.com/document.asp?doc_id=57677  D "This is not a surprise," says Arun Taneja of the Taneja Group. "TheG handwriting has been on the wall for at least six months, maybe a year. J There's hardly any innovation on the storage side. Their virtualization isJ in disarray, their storage boxes are not competitive, and they have no NAS
 to speak of."    Well, yuh...  2 Of course, not *everyone* is screwing up so badly:  7 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/08/12/ibm_hires_more/    - bill   ------------------------------  % Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:03:19 -0400 ( From: David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com>4 Subject: Re: HP servers management shakeup happening, Message-ID: <411BA2D7.7020108@tsoft-inc.com>   John Smith wrote:   ? > http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB109231043670389677,00.html  >  > H-P Posts Weak Results,  > Shakes Up Storage Unit       <snip>     >  > --- A > I wonder which heads are going to roll? And which products too.     J I wonder if they would have done better if they were allowed to advertize.     Dave   --  4 David Froble                       Tel: 724-529-04504 Dave Froble Enterprises, Inc.      Fax: 724-529-0596> DFE Ultralights, Inc.              E-Mail: davef@tsoft-inc.com 170 Grimplin Road  Vanderbilt, PA  15486    ------------------------------  % Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 19:47:29 -0700  From: Z <z@no.spam> 4 Subject: Re: HP servers management shakeup happening0 Message-ID: <10hoau311m6ko8f@corp.supernews.com>   BBFMETALWORKING wrote:E > Nice job HP.  Fiorina seems to be destroying shareholder value like  > she did at Lucent.   She's a real winner, isn't she?   6 I think her goal is destroy VMS first, then HP second.   ------------------------------  # Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:17:17 GMT 6 From: "Kenneth Farmer" <kfarmer@NOSPAM.spyderbyte.com>2 Subject: Interex: Fiorina Ousts Three Senior Execs@ Message-ID: <x7RSc.252295$2o2.14761894@twister.southeast.rr.com>  I Got this from Interex mailing list.  Out with Blackmore, in with Winkler.  Out with Milton, in with Novia.    Ken    --   Kenneth R. Farmer <><  http://www.OpenVMS.org  . ==============================================     B R E A K I N G   N E W S   , Fiorina Ousts Three Senior Execs In Shake-Up  H 11:51am, August 12 - HP Chairman and CEO Carly Fiorina sent a memo to HPH employees this morning announcing the ouster of three senior executives,+ including enterprise chief Peter Blackmore.   I Blackmore will be replaced by the company's chief marketing officer, Mike 4 Winkler, who will retain his current duties as well.  J Fiorina also announced that services executive Jack Novia will replace JimJ Milton as senior vice president and managing director for the Americas andL that Bernard Meric will replace Kasper Rorsted as head of the CSG in Europe, Middle East and Africa.   / All three departing men were Compaq executives.   H Fiorina said today in a conference call with analysts that the company'sL quarterly earnings fell short of expectations in part because of weakness in servers and storage products.   0 Fiorina promised "immediate management changes."  J Enterprise Servers and Storage reported revenue of $3.4 billion, down fiveI percent from the same quarter last year. Business Critical Server revenue L dropped eight percent to $828 million; Alpha fell by 32 percent, and NonStopE declined by 25 percent. UNIX revenue, however, rose eight percent and 2 Industry Standard Server revenue grew two percent.  K Storage revenue totaled $709 million for the quarter, a year-over-year drop  of 15 percent.  L The servers and storage businesses account for some 17 percent of HP income.  L The company posted a $586 million profit, which is 19 cents a share, for theG fiscal third quarter ended July 31, up from $297 million, or 10 cents a J share, a year earlier. Wall Street had estimated about 31 cents per share.  - HP will officially report earnings next week.     < Check http://www.interex.org for developments in this story.   ------------------------------    Date: 12 Aug 2004 19:59:16 -0700) From: baby_p_nut2@yahoo.com (Baby Peanut) 6 Subject: Re: Interex: Fiorina Ousts Three Senior Execs= Message-ID: <96d83290.0408121859.421bd666@posting.google.com>   ~ "Kenneth Farmer" <kfarmer@NOSPAM.spyderbyte.com> wrote in message news:<x7RSc.252295$2o2.14761894@twister.southeast.rr.com>...K > Got this from Interex mailing list.  Out with Blackmore, in with Winkler. ! > Out with Milton, in with Novia.  >  > Ken  >  > --   > Kenneth R. Farmer <><  > http://www.OpenVMS.org > 0 > ============================================== >    > L > Enterprise Servers and Storage reported revenue of $3.4 billion, down fiveK > percent from the same quarter last year. Business Critical Server revenue N > dropped eight percent to $828 million; Alpha fell by 32 percent, and NonStopG > declined by 25 percent. UNIX revenue, however, rose eight percent and 4 > Industry Standard Server revenue grew two percent.  + Which one of those does OpenVMS fall under?   3 Enterprise Servers and Storage sounds like windoze.  Business Critical Server ???O Alpha fell by 32 percent - oh but they are killing the Alpha on purpose, right? , Industry Standard Server?  Can't be OpenVMS. or was OpenVMS not mentioned?    ------------------------------    Date: 12 Aug 2004 14:22:32 -07001 From: keithparris_NOSPAM@yahoo.com (Keith Parris)  Subject: Re: LAVC/SCA Traffic = Message-ID: <cf15391e.0408121322.325e1060@posting.google.com>   Z "Barry Treahy, Jr." <Treahy@MMaz.com> wrote in message news:<4118FE3E.9040802@MMaz.com>...C > Anyone have a doc, or reference point, for the packet layout for  K > LAVC/SCA traffic?  I have some captured packets and would like to decode  
 > them...   F There's some info in the "OpenVMS Cluster Internals & Data Structures"  seminar I did at HP-ETS in 2002:U http://www.geocities.com/keithparris/decus_presentations/f2002_cluster_internals.ppt,  starting at slide 216.   ------------------------------  % Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 16:19:25 -0700 + From: "Barry Treahy, Jr." <Treahy@MMaz.com>  Subject: Re: LAVC/SCA Traffic % Message-ID: <411BFAFD.40709@MMaz.com>    Keith Parris wrote:   [ >"Barry Treahy, Jr." <Treahy@MMaz.com> wrote in message news:<4118FE3E.9040802@MMaz.com>...  >    > C >>Anyone have a doc, or reference point, for the packet layout for  K >>LAVC/SCA traffic?  I have some captured packets and would like to decode  
 >>them...  >>     >> > G >There's some info in the "OpenVMS Cluster Internals & Data Structures" ! >seminar I did at HP-ETS in 2002: V >http://www.geocities.com/keithparris/decus_presentations/f2002_cluster_internals.ppt, >starting at slide 216.  >    >  Thanks   --    > Barry Treahy, Jr                       E-mail: Treahy@MMaz.com> Midwest Microwave                          Phone: 480/314-1320> Vice President & CIO                         FAX: 480/661-7028                            ------------------------------  % Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 17:26:13 -0400 # From: "John Smith" <a@nonymous.com>  Subject: Meet the new faces - , Message-ID: <n--dnW5lWLXqfYbcRVn-iQ@igs.net>  E Ms. Fiorina said Peter Blackmore, the executive vice president of the J customer solutions group, will be replaced by Mike Winkler, who will be inI charge of direct sales to the company's enterprise, small and medium size K businesses and public sector customers worldwide. Mr. Winkler will continue $ to serve as chief marketing officer.L Meanwhile, Jim Milton, a senior vice president and managing director for theI customer solutions group for the Americas will be replaced by Jack Novia. I Mr. Novia was previously senior vice president and general manager of the G H-P Technology solutions group. He also served two years as senior vice 6 president and general manager of H-P Services America.  J Capping off the executive changes, Kasper Rorsted, a senior vice presidentH and managing director of the customer solutions group for Europe, MiddleK East and Africa will be replaced by Bernard Meric, who had served as senior B vice president of H-P's imaging and printing group in that region.  7 Ms. Fiorina said the changes are effective immediately.    --------  > I'd also expect changes further down the chain of command too.   ------------------------------  % Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 22:46:29 +0200  From: Dirk Munk <munk@home.nl>$ Subject: Re: MPlayer is a DVD player2 Message-ID: <cfgkvh$rin$1@news1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl>   Mark Berryman wrote:F > Do any of you who downloaded MPlayer for your VMS system have a DVD J > drive attached to it?  I'd like to hear how well MPlayer plays DVDs for E > you.  (Note that the default name for the DVD device compiled into  K > MPlayer is DQA0.  You must explicitly specify the DVD device if yours is  H > not DQA0.  The syntax will be: mplayer -dvd-device dkaNNN: dvd:// and & > the device must be mounted foreign). >  > Mark Berryman  > N I have a DS10 with a Radeon card. I suppose I need some kind of sound card as Q well? I tried to buy one some time ago, but it seems the supported sound card is  , so ancient that it belongs in a museum :-) .  N A DVD burner/player is so cheap now that I would love to install one to get a ; multi-media VMS system, but then I will need sound as well.    ------------------------------  % Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 16:38:00 -0400 $ From: "PEN" <paul.nuneznosp@mhp.com>< Subject: Re: PWIP driver won't start on TCPIP 5.4 after ECO2, Message-ID: <cfgkfc$qv0$1@hplms2.hpl.hp.com>   Hi,   E That problem occurs when the bind resolver is not enabled.   A fix is H available from HP or you can enable the resolver until ECO3 is released.  K To enable the resolver, run tcpip$config, select option 1 then, option 4...    Paul  I "Jean-Fran?ois Marchal" <jean-francois.marchal@x9000.fr> wrote in message 7 news:6bc20ab7.0408120910.470028ec@posting.google.com...  > Sorry if this is a repost. > ( > Upgration from VMS 7.3-1 and TCPIP 5.3' > to VMS 7.3-2 and TCPIP 5.4 then ECO2,   > the PWIP driver does not start > The log file shows : > / > getLocalAddr : get addrinfo failure, ipv6 : 4 * > interfaceInit : Could not getLocalAddr !E > main: PWIPdriver, PWIPacp interface init failure, aborting PWIP ACP  startup  >  > telnet and ftp run ok  > & > any help will be greatly appreciated# > as HP service is now closed here.  >  > Jean-Franois 
 > from FRANCE    ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 08:24:16 +0800 @ From: Tim Sneddon <first-initiallastname@bsddotinfomedia.com.au>0 Subject: Re: Rejecting network access to service* Message-ID: <2o2g1kF676alU1@uni-berlin.de>   Michael T. Davis wrote:  > 	We're running...  > A >   Compaq TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS Alpha Version V5.3 - ECO 2 5 >   on a AlphaServer 800 5/500 running OpenVMS V7.2-2    I'm running:  =   Compaq TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS VAX Version V5.3 - ECO 2 .   on a VAXstation 4000-60 running OpenVMS V7.3   > G > 	How do you configure a service--NTP, for example--to reject requests % > from a set of networks?  I tried...  > > > $ TCPIP SET SERVICE NTP/REJECT=NETWORK=(10.0.0.0:255.0.0.0,-L > _$ 169.254.0.0:255.255.0.0,172.16.0.0:255.240.0.0,192.168.0.0:255.255.0.0) > I > When I then TCPIP SHOW SERVICE/FULL NTP, none of this new configuration M > information is displayed, and packets from the supposedly rejected networks K > continue to enter.  FWIW, the "Accept host" and "Accept netw" fields both  > display 0.0.0.0 (by default).    I got the same.   J After a bit of messing around I restarted NTP and now the list of rejected networks shows up.  
 Regards, Tim.    ------------------------------   End of INFO-VAX 2004.446 ************************