1 INFO-VAX	Sat, 14 Aug 2004	Volume 2004 : Issue 449       Contents:+ Re: HP servers management shakeup happening - Re: Interex: Fiorina Ousts Three Senior Execs  Re: MPlayer is a DVD player 0 Re: NONSHRADR and NONRES messages at end of boot+ Re: TCP Server  SYSTEM-F-DUPLNAM on restart > Re: Unknown OPCOM message: "clm privilege violation" More info1 Re: [OT]: Sun on Track with Solaris-on-Power Plan   F ----------------------------------------------------------------------  % Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 11:58:51 -0400 # From: "John Smith" <a@nonymous.com> 4 Subject: Re: HP servers management shakeup happening, Message-ID: <IdednYWYcIAnq4PcRVn-qQ@igs.net>   David Froble wrote:  > JF Mezei wrote:  > ( >> There are 2 key points to this event: >>B >> When a CEO, instead of fixing problems,  starts to play musical >> chairs as aE >> knee jerk reaction to the announcement of disapointing results, it  >> generallyF >> means that the company is going down. The goal of such reorgs is to >> fool the G >> wall street casino analysts into thinking the CEO is strong, asserts  >> her5 >> leadership role and knows how to fix the problems.  >  > F > You must be remembering the re-orgs at DEC when things weren't going > well.  >  > C >> Secondly, from a VMS perspective, it is not good news when a guy 
 >> such asE >> Winkler who is known to be windows centric and thus against VMS is  >> promoted to$ >> gain even more rtesponsabilities. >  >  > Depends, see below.  >  > F >> If Marcello is the only one who is mildly pro VMS in the place, his
 >> lack of% >> promotion isn't good news for VMS.  >  > F > Maybe we don't want Rich to get too high.  At some point, you become: > cannon fodder to be blamed when the next quarter also isA > disappointing.  Now, if we only have to put up with Winkler for 3 > another quarter, I got no problem with that.  :-)     K A lot of very BAD things can happen on just one day in a quarter - June 25,  2001 comes to mind.    ------------------------------  # Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 12:15:08 GMT 5 From: rdeininger@mindspringdot.com (Robert Deininger) 6 Subject: Re: Interex: Fiorina Ousts Three Senior ExecsL Message-ID: <rdeininger-1408040822080001@user-105n8ce.dialup.mindspring.com>  = In article <96d83290.0408121859.421bd666@posting.google.com>, * baby_p_nut2@yahoo.com (Baby Peanut) wrote:  B >"Kenneth Farmer" <kfarmer@NOSPAM.spyderbyte.com> wrote in message< news:<x7RSc.252295$2o2.14761894@twister.southeast.rr.com>...L >> Got this from Interex mailing list.  Out with Blackmore, in with Winkler." >> Out with Milton, in with Novia. >>   >> Ken >>   >> --  >> Kenneth R. Farmer <>< >> http://www.OpenVMS.org  >>  1 >> ==============================================  >>   >  >>  M >> Enterprise Servers and Storage reported revenue of $3.4 billion, down five L >> percent from the same quarter last year. Business Critical Server revenueO >> dropped eight percent to $828 million; Alpha fell by 32 percent, and NonStop H >> declined by 25 percent. UNIX revenue, however, rose eight percent and5 >> Industry Standard Server revenue grew two percent.  > , >Which one of those does OpenVMS fall under?   Interesting question.    > 4 >Enterprise Servers and Storage sounds like windoze. >Business Critical Server ??? P >Alpha fell by 32 percent - oh but they are killing the Alpha on purpose, right?- >Industry Standard Server?  Can't be OpenVMS.  >or was OpenVMS not mentioned?  H There's an OpenVMS Division, which is part of BCS.  Alphaservers is alsoJ part of BCS.  Tru64 is either part of Alphaservers or part of BCS, I'm notH sure.  HP-UX is part of BCS.  And the PA and IA64 hardware divisions are part of BCS.  D Alphaserver revenue likely includes both VMS and Tru64 system sales.  0 BCS is part of ESS.  So is the storage division.  / ISS is the pentium-class Proliant server stuff.    ------------------------------  % Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 14:15:41 +0200  From: Dirk Munk <munk@home.nl>$ Subject: Re: MPlayer is a DVD player2 Message-ID: <cfkvpk$pk9$1@news5.tilbu1.nb.home.nl>   Keith A. Lewis wrote:  > Nigel Barker <nigel@hp.com> writes in article <k3roh0ttvngtuljsd0dvl90isqc4i5pjt8@4ax.com> dated Fri, 13 Aug 2004 07:25:42 GMT:  > E >>On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 22:46:29 +0200, Dirk Munk <munk@home.nl> wrote:  >> >>Q >>>I have a DS10 with a Radeon card. I suppose I need some kind of sound card as  T >>>well? I tried to buy one some time ago, but it seems the supported sound card is / >>>so ancient that it belongs in a museum :-) .  >>P >>I bought an Ensoniq Audio PCI soundcard on Ebay for 10 Euros. Works great. YouR >>need to check that the card is the version that has a large chip labelled either >>ES1371/ES1373 or CT5880. >  > G > So ES1370 won't work?  There seem to be a lot of those available.  :(   Q I just bought a real Ensonic ES1373 from the German Ebay. It was ¤ 6.99 plus ¤  * 17.50 postage :-( (Germany -> Netherlands)  L Ensonic was bought by Creative, and the ES1370 was used in the Soundblaster : SB16, the ES1371 in the SB64, and the ES1373 in the SB128.  O In the MMOV release notes they mention the "Compaq Creative Labs AudioPCI Card  9 (also referred to as the Compaq Ensoniq AudioPCI Card)" .    ------------------------------  # Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 13:28:32 GMT 7 From: "Tom Simpson" <thomas.simpson1@fubar.comcast.net> 9 Subject: Re: NONSHRADR and NONRES messages at end of boot / Message-ID: <4soTc.307979$XM6.167170@attbi_s53>   A FYI - I get the same error on 7.3-1.  I've never gotten around to 
 investigating G the cause, since it's an informational message and DECwindows works ok.    Regards, Tom   3 "JG" <chessmaster1010@hotmail.com> wrote in message 7 news:dd3f0cb7.0408120949.2547cc1a@posting.google.com... H > My 7.2-2 Alphas always output these messages on the console at the endD > of a boot.  I know it's not causing a problem, but I was wondering- > what I could do to get rid of the messages.  > : > %INSTALL-I-NOTSHRADR, DECW$XLIBSHR is not installed with > shareable address data > A > %INSTALL-I-NONSHRADR, image installed ignoring '/SHARE=ADDRESS' 5 > DISK$SYS:<SYS0.SYSCOMMON.SYSLIB>DECW$XTLIBSHRR5.EXE = > %INSTALL-I-NOTSHRADR, DECW$XTLIBSHRR5 is not installed with  > shareable address data > A > %INSTALL-I-NONSHRADR, image installed ignoring '/SHARE=ADDRESS' 5 > DISK$SYS:<SYS0.SYSCOMMON.SYSLIB>DECW$XMLIBSHR12.EXE = > %INSTALL-I-NOTSHRADR, DECW$XMLIBSHR12 is not installed with  > shareable address data > 9 > %INSTALL-I-NONRES, image installed ignoring '/RESIDENT' 6 > DISK$SYS:<SYS0.SYSCOMMON.SYSLIB>DECW$MRMLIBSHR12.EXE= > -INSTALL-E-NOGHREG, insufficient memory in the code or data  > granularity hint region  > A > %INSTALL-I-NONSHRADR, image installed ignoring '/SHARE=ADDRESS' 6 > DISK$SYS:<SYS0.SYSCOMMON.SYSLIB>DECW$MRMLIBSHR12.EXE> > %INSTALL-I-NOTSHRADR, DECW$MRMLIBSHR12 is not installed with > shareable address data > 9 > %INSTALL-I-NONRES, image installed ignoring '/RESIDENT' 6 > DISK$SYS:<SYS0.SYSCOMMON.SYSLIB>DECW$DXMLIBSHR12.EXE) > -INSTALL-E-NOGHREG, insufficient memory    ------------------------------  % Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 03:07:45 -0400 - From: JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@teksavvy.com> 4 Subject: Re: TCP Server  SYSTEM-F-DUPLNAM on restart, Message-ID: <411DBA2D.83314B77@teksavvy.com>   Dugald Peacock wrote: B > When I have no clients attached I can stop and restart my serverD > immediately.  However if there is one or more clients and I try toH > restart my server as described above I get SYSTEM-F-DUPLNAM when I tryH > to set the server options.  After one minute it is possible to restart > my server without any errors.     ) HELP/MESSAGE DUPLNAM is your friend here.   K Do you use SPAWN/NAME=xxx when you start your server process ? If so, right  after you've stopped it, issue:   $ PIPE SHOW SYS | search sys$input xxx  K (where xxx is the process name given to your server). That will tell you if H the process is still running, and more importantly, what state it is in.  J If you tell us what state the process is in during that minute where it isN hanging around, then we can provide additional hints on why this is happening.   ------------------------------  # Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 10:55:59 GMT " From:   VAXman-  @SendSpamHere.ORGG Subject: Re: Unknown OPCOM message: "clm privilege violation" More info 0 Message-ID: <00A36554.3A3A9171@SendSpamHere.ORG>  v In article <130820041914341457%kent.at.bci.com@nospam.invalid>, Kent Behrends <kent.at.bci.com@nospam.invalid> writes:: >I am getting the following opcom messages on all 5 of my ! >OpenVMS Alpha 7.2 cluster nodes:  > H >%%%%%%%%%%%  OPCOM   9-AUG-2004 10:55:08.26  %%%%%%%%%%%  DUMP_LOG_FILE > G >OPCOM has noticed a condition which might be due to an internal error. K >It might also be explained by normal events, especially if nodes have just M >crashed or rebooted in a VAXcluster.  Please bring this message to Digital's H >attention only if you are having problems with operator communications. > < >Buffer is   219 (%X00DB) bytes -- "clm privilege violation"o > 6174733C 20202020 20204D45 54535953 00010004 FFFFFFFF 5FFFFFFF 00000008 ......._........SYSTEM      <sta 0000 o > 00000001 0094000A 4D40000A 47200001 000D0000 00B50902 0413130C 203E7472 rt> ............. G..@M........ 0020 o > 00080000 00010000 00000000 00000000 0407000A 47C00001 000D0000 00000000 ..........G.................... 0040 o > 4D455453 59532020 20202020 4D455453 59530001 0004FFFF FFFFFFFF FFFF0000 ..............SYSTEM      SYSTEM 0060 o > 00000001 00040000 00010000 000000FF F9FF0000 00020000 0000010A 00042020   ............................. 0080 o > 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 000D0000 00010006 00060000 00000000 ................................ 00A0 o > 00000000 003A3041 504F2431 30565245 535F6961 67612067 6E690000 00000000 ......ing agai_SERV01$OPA0:..... 00C0  >  >  >Anyone have any ideas?  >  >--  >--- >Kent Behrends >BEHR Consulting International >http://www.bci.com      Is RDB on this system?   --  < http://www.ProvN.com  for the *best* OpenVMS system security=                       solutions that others only claim to be.  --  , Cyber-Terrorism (si'-ber tayr'-or-iz-em) n.:M   The release of, the sale of, or the use of any Micro$oft software product!   --  K VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker   VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)COM    ------------------------------  % Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 14:24:52 +0200 * From: Paul Sture <nospam@sture.homeip.net>: Subject: Re: [OT]: Sun on Track with Solaris-on-Power Plan* Message-ID: <2o6ekoF748otU1@uni-berlin.de>   John Smith wrote: N > http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1738&ncid=1208&e=10&u=/zd/20 > 040812/tc_zd/133330  >  > ) > Sun on Track with Solaris-on-Power Plan  >  > Thu Aug 12, 5:45 AM ET > Jeffrey Burt - eWEEK > L > Sun Microsystems Inc.'s plans for bringing its Solaris operating system to5 > IBM's Power architecture appear to be moving along.  >    ...   L > "For example, as we continue porting Solaris onto IBM's Power architectureG > (demo coming soon!), the real issue we have to grapple with isn't the J > expense of moving our software over-it's the expense of requalifying allH > our, and all our ISV's infrastructure once the port is done," SchwartzJ > wrote. "We're hopeful IBM will support us (there are certainly enough ofN > their employees reading these blogs to suggest they're paying attention)-and: > not close off choice and substitution to its customers." >   F It is refreshing to see someone stress the importance of requalifying 	 software.    --  
 Paul Sture  - OS X: "It's Unix, Jim, but not as we know it"    ------------------------------   End of INFO-VAX 2004.449 ************************