1 INFO-VAX	Sat, 11 Dec 2004	Volume 2004 : Issue 686       Contents: Anything and Everything  Re: Anything and Everything   Customizing the output of CTRL-T$ Re: Customizing the output of CTRL-T$ Re: Customizing the output of CTRL-T$ Re: Customizing the output of CTRL-T$ Re: Customizing the output of CTRL-T$ Re: Customizing the output of CTRL-T$ Re: Customizing the output of CTRL-T$ Re: Customizing the output of CTRL-T$ Re: Customizing the output of CTRL-T( Re: J F on...what else...Americans again( Re: J F on...what else...Americans again( Re: J F on...what else...Americans again( Re: J F on...what else...Americans again( Re: J F on...what else...Americans again$ Local Domain Field in TCPIP Services( Re: Local Domain Field in TCPIP Services3 Looking for feedback on Host-Based Minimerge (HBMM) 0 Re: NFS mount of ODS-5 vs traditional parse type$ Re: PC/PCI DRQ3B card for Windows XP$ Re: PC/PCI DRQ3B card for Windows XP$ Re: PC/PCI DRQ3B card for Windows XP Re: Simple EDT or TPU init file  Re: Simple EDT or TPU init file  Re: Simple EDT or TPU init file  Re: Simple EDT or TPU init file  Re: Simple EDT or TPU init file  Re: Simple EDT or TPU init file  Re: TK50 cartridge resurrection   F ----------------------------------------------------------------------  # Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 19:56:44 GMT 6 From: "Kenneth Farmer" <kfarmer@NOSPAM.spyderbyte.com>  Subject: Anything and Everything> Message-ID: <0cnud.35061$Mu3.2422575@twister.southeast.rr.com>  ; "JF Mezei" <jfmezei.spamnot@teksavvy.com> wrote in message  & news:41B9DD14.F641E2DF@teksavvy.com... > Kenneth Farmer wrote:  >>J >> I'm working on getting another trade press article up.  Need customers  >> who+ >> use DECnet with one of these conditions:  > H > You need to specify if DECnet is being used in a LAN or WAN scenario.  > You'llI > probably still find plenty of DECNet users with machine sright next to   > eachH > other to help with management tasks etc (such as SYSMAN, MONITOR etc). > J > So you need to specify if you are looking for DECnet users with nodes in8 > different buildings/cities or just plain decnet users.    K I emailed him and asked.  His response was, "anything and everything to do  
 with DECnet."      Ken    OpenVMS.org % _____________________________________  Kenneth R. Farmer <>< & SpyderByte: http://www.SpyderByte.com    ------------------------------    Date: 10 Dec 2004 13:48:03 -0800  From: jordan.henderson@gmail.com$ Subject: Re: Anything and EverythingC Message-ID: <1102715283.971083.213640@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>   > >> You need to specify if DECnet is being used in a LAN or WAN	 scenario. 	 >> You'll F >> probably still find plenty of DECNet users with machine sright next to >> each C >> other to help with management tasks etc (such as SYSMAN, MONITOR  etc).   B >> So you need to specify if you are looking for DECnet users with nodes in9 >> different buildings/cities or just plain decnet users.   G > I emailed him and asked. His response was, "anything and > everything  to do  > with DECnet."   E If you need "anything and everything" then you'll want to mention how = DECnet is used in single-node (not LAN nor WAN) systems as an  application protocol.   F I'm not sure that I remember the details on this, but it seems like itF was only 7.1 where you could run OpenVMS withOUT DECnet at all.  A lot. of stuff used to depend on DECnet being there.   -Jordan Henderson    ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 23:57:40 +0200 0 From: "Guy Peleg" <guy.peleg@remove_this_hp.com>) Subject: Customizing the output of CTRL-T , Message-ID: <41ba1eac$1@usenet01.boi.hp.com>  H We have added the ability to customize the output of the CTRL-T routine.  C If the symbol DCL$CTRLT is defined DCL will append it's contents to   F the traditional CTRL-T output. It allows users to use CTRL-T for their  B own needs in their applications. It may also be used for debugging   user/supervisor mode code.  4 Here is a simple DCL procedure using the new feature   IPL31> ty ctrlt_loop.com  	 $ inner=0   	 $ outer=0    $ loop:    $ loop1:  ) $ if inner .gt. 20000 then goto end_loop1    $ inner=inner+1   A $ dcl$ctrlt=F$FAO("Inner loop count is !SL !/ Outer loop count is  !SL",inner,outer)    $ goto loop1   $ end_loop1:  	 $ inner=0    $ outer=outer+1    $ goto loop    IPL31> @ctrlt_loop  B IPL31::GUY 10:46:37 (DCL) CPU=00:03:42.68 PF=13453 IO=6743 MEM=187   Inner loop count is 12306    Outer loop count is 0   B IPL31::GUY 10:46:43 (DCL) CPU=00:03:49.19 PF=13455 IO=6744 MEM=187   Inner loop count is 19200    Outer loop count is 2   4 Here is a simple C program utilizing the new feature   IPL31> ty ctrlt_looper.c   #include <descrip>   void main()    {    int counter=0;  " $DESCRIPTOR(sym_name,"dcl$ctrlt");  * static struct dsc$descriptor_s value_desc;   char buffer[256]={0};   ' value_desc.dsc$b_dtype = DSC$K_DTYPE_T;   ' value_desc.dsc$b_class = DSC$K_CLASS_S;   
 while (1){  
 counter++;  ( sprintf(buffer,"Counter is %d",counter);  " value_desc.dsc$a_pointer = buffer;  ) value_desc.dsc$w_length = strlen(buffer);   & lib$set_symbol(&sym_name,&value_desc);   }    }    IPL31> r ctrlt_looper   F IPL31::GUY 10:47:27 CTRLT_LOO CPU=00:03:53.26 PF=13631 IO=6784 MEM=335   Counter is 216766   F IPL31::GUY 10:47:28 CTRLT_LOO CPU=00:03:54.45 PF=13631 IO=6785 MEM=335   Counter is 338429   L The DCL$CTRLT symbol may have different values in different procedure levels   which I find useful as well.      A What do you think? unfortunately we missed the V8.2 train so this   H will ship with the first version after V8.2. However, if the response is  ? positive enough, I'll consider backporting it to V7.3-2 or V8.2   	 Guy Peleg    OpenVMS Engineering    ------------------------------  # Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:45:29 GMT L From: winston@SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU (Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing)- Subject: Re: Customizing the output of CTRL-T 6 Message-ID: <00A3C24F.5B4C12E5@SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>  _ In article <41ba1eac$1@usenet01.boi.hp.com>, "Guy Peleg" <guy.peleg@remove_this_hp.com> writes: I >We have added the ability to customize the output of the CTRL-T routine.   
 [Snippage] >  > B >What do you think? unfortunately we missed the V8.2 train so this > I >will ship with the first version after V8.2. However, if the response is  > @ >positive enough, I'll consider backporting it to V7.3-2 or V8.2  O I think this is pretty darn cool.  I don't have a business case for backporting M it, and I don't have a need right this second, but I can think of a number of > cases where this would have been very, very handy in the past.   -- Alan    ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:57:31 -0500 - From: JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@teksavvy.com> - Subject: Re: Customizing the output of CTRL-T , Message-ID: <41BA29C2.E2126C94@teksavvy.com>   Guy Peleg wrote:J > We have added the ability to customize the output of the CTRL-T routine.  ) "We" ???? Shouldn't this be "I" ????  :-)   E > If the symbol DCL$CTRLT is defined DCL will append it's contents to H > the traditional CTRL-T output. It allows users to use CTRL-T for their  L Neat trick. However, I tried this on my all mighty microvax II (VMS 7.2) andI it doesn't work as documented. The "We" must learn to be better santas to H deliver those improvements to existing systems faster (without customersM realising someone has penetrated their systems to replace DCL.EXE, of course)  :-) :-) :-)   I Remember that SANTA gets to deliver goodies inside people's homes without K trigerring any alarms around the world in 24 hours. Shirley you can deliver 5 little gifts to those 400k systems in less time ? :-)   N Also, personally, I would have prefered to see the text added on the same lineD if it fits within 80 characters. Would have made for cleaner output.   ------------------------------  % Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 00:56:42 +0200 0 From: "Guy Peleg" <guy.peleg@remove_this_hp.com>- Subject: Re: Customizing the output of CTRL-T * Message-ID: <41ba2c84@usenet01.boi.hp.com>  : "JF Mezei" <jfmezei.spamnot@teksavvy.com> wrote in message& news:41BA29C2.E2126C94@teksavvy.com... > Guy Peleg wrote:L > > We have added the ability to customize the output of the CTRL-T routine. > + > "We" ???? Shouldn't this be "I" ????  :-)  > G > > If the symbol DCL$CTRLT is defined DCL will append it's contents to J > > the traditional CTRL-T output. It allows users to use CTRL-T for their > J > Neat trick. However, I tried this on my all mighty microvax II (VMS 7.2) and K > it doesn't work as documented. The "We" must learn to be better santas to J > deliver those improvements to existing systems faster (without customersG > realising someone has penetrated their systems to replace DCL.EXE, of  course) 
 > :-) :-) :-)  > K > Remember that SANTA gets to deliver goodies inside people's homes without E > trigerring any alarms around the world in 24 hours. Shirley you can  deliver 7 > little gifts to those 400k systems in less time ? :-)  > K > Also, personally, I would have prefered to see the text added on the same  lineF > if it fits within 80 characters. Would have made for cleaner output.  E I'm up to the challenge !!! I'm willing to provide VAX image for V7.3    ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 18:20:58 -0500 2 From: "Stanley F. Quayle" <squayle@insight.rr.com>- Subject: Re: Customizing the output of CTRL-T - Message-ID: <41B9E90A.2138.C22DCF1@localhost>   ( On 11 Dec 2004 at 0:56, Guy Peleg wrote:G > I'm up to the challenge !!! I'm willing to provide VAX image for V7.3   
 Please do.  
 --Stan Quayle  Quayle Consulting Inc.  
 ----------- Stanley F. Quayle, P.E. N8SQ  +1 614-868-1363 3 8572 North Spring Ct., Pickerington, OH  43147  USA 0 stan-at-stanq-dot-com       http://www.stanq.com   ------------------------------  + Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 23:29:21 +0000 (UTC) 6 From: peter@langstoeger.at (Peter 'EPLAN' LANGSTOEGER)- Subject: Re: Customizing the output of CTRL-T 1 Message-ID: <newscache$3k4j8i$ivl1$1@news.sil.at>    In article <00A3C24F.5B4C12E5@SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>, winston@SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU (Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing) writes: ` >In article <41ba1eac$1@usenet01.boi.hp.com>, "Guy Peleg" <guy.peleg@remove_this_hp.com> writes:J >>We have added the ability to customize the output of the CTRL-T routine. >[Snippage] C >>What do you think? unfortunately we missed the V8.2 train so this J >>will ship with the first version after V8.2. However, if the response isA >>positive enough, I'll consider backporting it to V7.3-2 or V8.2  > P >I think this is pretty darn cool.  I don't have a business case for backportingN >it, and I don't have a need right this second, but I can think of a number of? >cases where this would have been very, very handy in the past.    Thanks Guy for the good work) (and thanks Alan to find the right words)    --   Peter "EPLAN" LANGSTOEGER % Network and OpenVMS system specialist  E-mail  peter@langstoeger.atF A-1030 VIENNA  AUSTRIA              I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist   ------------------------------  + Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 23:30:54 +0000 (UTC) 6 From: peter@langstoeger.at (Peter 'EPLAN' LANGSTOEGER)- Subject: Re: Customizing the output of CTRL-T 1 Message-ID: <newscache$jm4j8i$qzl1$1@news.sil.at>   ] In article <41ba2c84@usenet01.boi.hp.com>, "Guy Peleg" <guy.peleg@remove_this_hp.com> writes: F >I'm up to the challenge !!! I'm willing to provide VAX image for V7.3   Whoopie.+ But what has happened to OpenVMS VAX V8.2 ?    --   Peter "EPLAN" LANGSTOEGER % Network and OpenVMS system specialist  E-mail  peter@langstoeger.atF A-1030 VIENNA  AUSTRIA              I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist   ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:41:13 -0800 4 From: Alan Frisbie <Usenet02_REMOVE@Flying-Disk.com>- Subject: Re: Customizing the output of CTRL-T . Message-ID: <41BA4229.3030802@Flying-Disk.com>   Guy Peleg wrote:  J > We have added the ability to customize the output of the CTRL-T routine.  ? Guy, you are one Cool Guy!   Thank you very much.   I can think A of many times over the years when this would have save me a *lot* 7 of debugging time, especially with other people's code.   > I'm sorry that it missed the v8.2 cutoff, but if a back-ported> image should become available for either v8.2 or v7.3-2 I will install it immediately.    Thanks,  Alan   ------------------------------    Date: 10 Dec 2004 20:48:45 -0800  From: "Barry" <dysert@gmail.com>- Subject: Re: Customizing the output of CTRL-T C Message-ID: <1102740525.957506.253960@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>   C I will add my voice to the chorus.  This is a long overdue feature. C Not only would it have helped when debugging complicated loops, but C even when doing file i/o - it would be an easy way to find out what F record you're on (without going into SDA and parsing the RABs). PleaseG let us know when we can get it and how to put it on the VAXes (Alphas?)  we have access to.  Thanks!!   ------------------------------  # Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 21:22:24 GMT   From: Zippy <zipadeedoda@no.com>1 Subject: Re: J F on...what else...Americans again 8 Message-ID: <9l4kr01d63g8uibpar5vvfd3kjttu0ilur@4ax.com>  & On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:53:09 GMT, john) <z2345678998765432y@sbcglobal.net> wrote:   > >On 10 Dec 2004 03:37:56 -0800, semiretired@my-deja.com wrote: >  >>Nomen Nescio wrote:  >>>JF Mezei wrote  >>. >>>>re: stories of strip searches in airports.G >>>>Look, you guys re-elected the very government that instituted those H >>>>measures in the first place. You have no right to complain about theH >>>>measures americans requested. After all, you are scared shit of someG >>>>terrorist and have repeatedly said on US TV that you are willing to E >>>>undergo whatever measures ans searching is necessary to catch the I >>>>terrorists. Your government is merely doing what you are asking it to  >>do.  > 3 >Whether you like it or not, his comments are true.  > F >I live in the US and, unlike you, I welcome any comments about the US >by anybody. > ! >I can handle criticism--Can you?     E Criticism from JF is a different story.  His comments don't mean SHIT E in the real world.  He hasn't seen the real world in years.  Even his C fellow Canadians are waiting for him to come out of the basement so " they can beat the crap out of him.   ------------------------------  # Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:04:42 GMT L From: winston@SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU (Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing)1 Subject: Re: J F on...what else...Americans again 6 Message-ID: <00A3C249.A8E5957A@SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>  ] In article <uPkud.29997$bD6.742784@wagner.videotron.net>, "Joseph" <miom@moimiom.org> writes:  > ; >"john" <z2345678998765432y@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message 3 >news:bskjr0th5gccdsu0r2h31aejjtaqitg6pg@4ax.com... @ >> On 10 Dec 2004 03:37:56 -0800, semiretired@my-deja.com wrote: >> >> >Nomen Nescio wrote:  >> >>JF Mezei wrote  >> >0 >> >>>re: stories of strip searches in airports.I >> >>>Look, you guys re-elected the very government that instituted those J >> >>>measures in the first place. You have no right to complain about theJ >> >>>measures americans requested. After all, you are scared shit of someI >> >>>terrorist and have repeatedly said on US TV that you are willing to G >> >>>undergo whatever measures ans searching is necessary to catch the K >> >>>terrorists. Your government is merely doing what you are asking it to  >> >do.  >>5 >> Whether you like it or not, his comments are true.  >>H >> I live in the US and, unlike you, I welcome any comments about the US >> by anybody. >># >> I can handle criticism--Can you?  >> >G >> >>For someone who hates the US so much, you sure spend an inordinate H >> >>amount of time watching US television.  And reading US papers.  AndJ >> >>talking about the US.  And obsessing about the US.  And ranting about2 >> >>the US.  And trolling about the US on usenet. >> >A >> >Surely the "Treasonable Actions by Aliens Regulations" forbid  >> >non-citizens >> >discussing such matters? >> >> > < >Here is my thorie, not just the US but in KaKanada also... >  >In US, K >Over $500 billions, because their was 6,000 dead (max for the last decade)  >because of terrorists.   J The argument would be, rather, all that money to make America safer in theO future.  (I'm not convinced that this is the way to go about it, but it's not a 7 $500 billion line item labeled punishment and revenge.)   M >How much was finance by the gouvernement in research for cancer for exemple? > >close to $0. That is for x millions dead in the last decade).  8 According to the National Cancer Institute Web Site, at   4 http://plan.cancer.gov/pdf/nci_2006_plan.pdf#page=56  M the Federal Budget request for FY2005 for the National Cancer Institutes was  L almost five billion dollars, and the request for FY2006 is about six billionL dollars.  (Billion = thousand million, for those playing along outside North	 America.)   N I'm not saying anything here about your larger point, but five billion dollarsK isn't very close to zero.  You need to pick a better example if you want to 4 convince anybody who doesn't already agree with you.  O (I haven't found out what actually _happened_ to the five billion dollar budget I request in the big omnibus budget scramble.  But agencies tend to ask for M inflationary increases of their previous year's budgets unless they've gotten J Congressional or Presidential signals that they should start expensive newL initiatives, so that five billion is probably not that much higher than they actually _got_ in FY2004.)   > G >Where should the priority go? Unless, the american governement (we the 0 >people) doesn't care about the peolpe who dies.   -- Alan    ------------------------------  # Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:14:56 GMT - From: john <z2345678998765432y@sbcglobal.net> 1 Subject: Re: J F on...what else...Americans again 8 Message-ID: <3o7kr0lalsrmg03vhbioofpoappjcc6b69@4ax.com>  C On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 21:22:24 GMT, Zippy <zipadeedoda@no.com> wrote:   ' >On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:53:09 GMT, john * ><z2345678998765432y@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > ? >>On 10 Dec 2004 03:37:56 -0800, semiretired@my-deja.com wrote:  >> >>>Nomen Nescio wrote: >>>>JF Mezei wrote >>> / >>>>>re: stories of strip searches in airports. H >>>>>Look, you guys re-elected the very government that instituted thoseI >>>>>measures in the first place. You have no right to complain about the I >>>>>measures americans requested. After all, you are scared shit of some H >>>>>terrorist and have repeatedly said on US TV that you are willing toF >>>>>undergo whatever measures ans searching is necessary to catch theJ >>>>>terrorists. Your government is merely doing what you are asking it to >>>do. >>4 >>Whether you like it or not, his comments are true. >>G >>I live in the US and, unlike you, I welcome any comments about the US 
 >>by anybody.  >>" >>I can handle criticism--Can you? >  > F >Criticism from JF is a different story.  His comments don't mean SHITF >in the real world.  He hasn't seen the real world in years.  Even hisD >fellow Canadians are waiting for him to come out of the basement so# >they can beat the crap out of him.      Oh, I see, selective criticism.   E Have you made up a list of who HAS YOUR APPROVAL to  criticize the US 8 and who does not have your approval to criticize the US?     YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!    ------------------------------  # Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 00:06:19 GMT   From: Zippy <zipadeedoda@no.com>1 Subject: Re: J F on...what else...Americans again 8 Message-ID: <mfekr0p7t8tj2lsepumg57iglrpuel0o61@4ax.com>  & On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:14:56 GMT, john) <z2345678998765432y@sbcglobal.net> wrote:   D >On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 21:22:24 GMT, Zippy <zipadeedoda@no.com> wrote: > ( >>On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:53:09 GMT, john+ >><z2345678998765432y@sbcglobal.net> wrote:  >>@ >>>On 10 Dec 2004 03:37:56 -0800, semiretired@my-deja.com wrote: >>>  >>>>Nomen Nescio wrote:  >>>>>JF Mezei wrote  >>>>0 >>>>>>re: stories of strip searches in airports.I >>>>>>Look, you guys re-elected the very government that instituted those J >>>>>>measures in the first place. You have no right to complain about theJ >>>>>>measures americans requested. After all, you are scared shit of someI >>>>>>terrorist and have repeatedly said on US TV that you are willing to G >>>>>>undergo whatever measures ans searching is necessary to catch the K >>>>>>terrorists. Your government is merely doing what you are asking it to  >>>>do.  >>> 5 >>>Whether you like it or not, his comments are true.  >>> H >>>I live in the US and, unlike you, I welcome any comments about the US >>>by anybody. >>> # >>>I can handle criticism--Can you?  >> >>G >>Criticism from JF is a different story.  His comments don't mean SHIT G >>in the real world.  He hasn't seen the real world in years.  Even his E >>fellow Canadians are waiting for him to come out of the basement so $ >>they can beat the crap out of him. >  >   >Oh, I see, selective criticism. > F >Have you made up a list of who HAS YOUR APPROVAL to  criticize the US9 >and who does not have your approval to criticize the US?  >  >  >YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!    ( I handle the truth just fine, thank you./ John & JF---Butt Buddies? or just good friends.    ------------------------------  # Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 06:21:41 GMT - From: john <z2345678998765432y@sbcglobal.net> 1 Subject: Re: J F on...what else...Americans again 8 Message-ID: <me4lr0ps9oe3nflko6ra1bje924e8p8ghq@4ax.com>  C On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 00:06:19 GMT, Zippy <zipadeedoda@no.com> wrote:   ' >On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:14:56 GMT, john * ><z2345678998765432y@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > E >>On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 21:22:24 GMT, Zippy <zipadeedoda@no.com> wrote:  >>) >>>On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:53:09 GMT, john , >>><z2345678998765432y@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>> A >>>>On 10 Dec 2004 03:37:56 -0800, semiretired@my-deja.com wrote:  >>>> >>>>>Nomen Nescio wrote: >>>>>>JF Mezei wrote >>>>> 1 >>>>>>>re: stories of strip searches in airports. J >>>>>>>Look, you guys re-elected the very government that instituted thoseK >>>>>>>measures in the first place. You have no right to complain about the K >>>>>>>measures americans requested. After all, you are scared shit of some J >>>>>>>terrorist and have repeatedly said on US TV that you are willing toH >>>>>>>undergo whatever measures ans searching is necessary to catch theL >>>>>>>terrorists. Your government is merely doing what you are asking it to >>>>>do. >>>>6 >>>>Whether you like it or not, his comments are true. >>>>I >>>>I live in the US and, unlike you, I welcome any comments about the US  >>>>by anybody.  >>>>$ >>>>I can handle criticism--Can you? >>>  >>> H >>>Criticism from JF is a different story.  His comments don't mean SHITH >>>in the real world.  He hasn't seen the real world in years.  Even hisF >>>fellow Canadians are waiting for him to come out of the basement so% >>>they can beat the crap out of him.  >> >>! >>Oh, I see, selective criticism.  >>G >>Have you made up a list of who HAS YOUR APPROVAL to  criticize the US : >>and who does not have your approval to criticize the US? >> >> >>YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!  >  > ) >I handle the truth just fine, thank you. 0 >John & JF---Butt Buddies? or just good friends.     I ask you again:  E Have you made up a list of who HAS YOUR APPROVAL to  criticize the US 8 and who does not have your approval to criticize the US?   ------------------------------    Date: 10 Dec 2004 10:58:19 -0800" From: dave.baxter@bannerhealth.com- Subject: Local Domain Field in TCPIP Services A Message-ID: <1102705099.713955.3840@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>   > Can anyone tell me what purpose the Local Domain serves in theF configuration and operation of the Name/Bind service in TCPIP Services for OpenVMS.@ All I am looking for is a general description of what it is usedC for so I can consider whether my current setting is contributing in 6 anyway to some minor problems I am having with my app.   thanks   Dave   ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 15:01:06 -0500 - From: JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@teksavvy.com> 1 Subject: Re: Local Domain Field in TCPIP Services , Message-ID: <41BA0074.F0856CD1@teksavvy.com>  # dave.baxter@bannerhealth.com wrote:  > @ > Can anyone tell me what purpose the Local Domain serves in theH > configuration and operation of the Name/Bind service in TCPIP Services > for OpenVMS.   TCPIP> HELP SET CONF/DOMAIN   5 This is what sets the "Local Domain" which is listed.   N I ASSUME that this is what is used as "domain:" which is listed with SHOW NAMEK in the systemwide block. (eg: when started, it reads the "/domain" from the J stored configuration and uses it for both the local domain shown on top of8 SHOW NAME as well as the domain in the systemwide block.  Q According to the doc, this is the default domain which is appended to a hostname.   M fos instance, if you "nslookup hot", and your domain is "chocolate.com", then K the bind resolver would ask its bind servers to resolve "hot.chocolate.com"   L However, this gets confusing when you look at the documentation for /PATH inI either HELP SET CONF NAME /PATH or HELP SET NAME /PATH since this is very Q similar in functionlity where you can sepcify multiple default domains to search.    ------------------------------    Date: 10 Dec 2004 14:48:42 -0500/ From: brooks@cuebid.zko.dec.nospam (Rob Brooks) < Subject: Looking for feedback on Host-Based Minimerge (HBMM)- Message-ID: <fuGOTMVcXjT8@cuebid.zko.dec.com>   J Host-Based Minimerge (HBMM) has been available for some time (for V8.2 in N field test, and V7.3-2 by either a special HBMM kit or the latest UPDATE kit).  
 Any feedback?   I Please note that there are actually two new features added in this kit;   H HBMM itself, and the priority scheme to better-manage which systems willO actually perform full copies, or merges or any type.  The priority stuff can be  used without involving HBMM.  L While we don't plan to make major changes to HBMM for V8.3, if there is someH significant aspects that we've missed, we'd like to try to address that.  K I will be putting out another call for $GETDVI suggestions in a few months; 0 please hold any suggestions you have until then.  J V8.2 has about 25 new $GETDVI item codes; you'll need to wait a bit to seeO what they are (they were added well after the deadline had passed for inclusion  in the V8.2 field test.)     --    M Rob Brooks    VMS Engineering -- I/O Exec Group     brooks!cuebid.zko.dec.com    ------------------------------    Date: 10 Dec 2004 13:07:23 -0600; From: koehler@eisner.nospam.encompasserve.org (Bob Koehler) 9 Subject: Re: NFS mount of ODS-5 vs traditional parse type 3 Message-ID: <qde9cFOnFC6Q@eisner.encompasserve.org>   { In article <1102687472.658515.278560@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, "Sylvain F.DUBOIS" <sylvain_dubois_ca@yahoo.ca> writes: 	 > Hi Bob,  >  > @ > One disk needs to have case-preserving for ORACLE 9i . But theI > remaining of the disk doesn't need it. Thus, we can't share it with NFS / > throught the taditional case-insensitive way.   B    Then are you using the latest VMS that has the process-specific<    case-sentitive hooks?  Or is this just some Oracle thing?  <    I thought Oracle worked on case-insensitive file systems.   ------------------------------    Date: 10 Dec 2004 13:04:39 -0600; From: koehler@eisner.nospam.encompasserve.org (Bob Koehler) - Subject: Re: PC/PCI DRQ3B card for Windows XP 3 Message-ID: <9V3TUxCb0Vo6@eisner.encompasserve.org>   P In article <41B9EB15.3080805@acm.org>, Arthur Schwarz <aschwarz@acm.org> writes:   > I am really looking for a : > Windows-centric rehost rather than a Vax-centric rehost.  D    The Windows kernel is not capable of doing the kinds of things weF    used DRV11-WA for.  Your case may be different, but you should findC    out first if you need a the low latency or high determinism that     Windows can not do.   ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:29:29 -0500 2 From: "Stanley F. Quayle" <squayle@insight.rr.com>- Subject: Re: PC/PCI DRQ3B card for Windows XP . Message-ID: <41B9B2C9.21010.B4EEF58@localhost>  . On 10 Dec 2004 at 10:29, Arthur Schwarz wrote:D > The logical website (www.logical-co.com) has pages last updated in- > 2003. Does anyone know how viable they are?   D They're very viable -- I was just talking to them last week about a = different VAX-related product.  Send them a call or an email.   @ > I am really looking for a Windows-centric rehost rather than aC > Vax-centric rehost. This simplifies some of the local logistics.    F I agree that adding a VAX emulator for a pure Windows situation seems D kinda crazy.  You could, in theory, write a driver for the device.  = CHARON-VAX can talk to it, and it's a Windows app, after all.   
 --Stan Quayle  Quayle Consulting Inc.  
 ----------- Stanley F. Quayle, P.E. N8SQ  +1 614-868-1363 3 8572 North Spring Ct., Pickerington, OH  43147  USA 0 stan-at-stanq-dot-com       http://www.stanq.com   ------------------------------    Date: 10 Dec 2004 16:56:27 -0600- From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) - Subject: Re: PC/PCI DRQ3B card for Windows XP 3 Message-ID: <Mh$riCGGK24T@eisner.encompasserve.org>   P In article <41B9EB15.3080805@acm.org>, Arthur Schwarz <aschwarz@acm.org> writes: > Dave Weatherall wrote:  F >> The Logical company, I believe. They are reputed to work well with  >> Charon-VAX. >>   > J > I've looked at them and sent them a request for information. It appears H > that their product is PCI compliant but requires a Vax emulator. I've > > heard that Charon_VM is suitable. I am really looking for a K > Windows-centric rehost rather than a Vax-centric rehost. This simplifies   > some of the local logistics. > K > The logical website (www.logical-co.com) has pages last updated in 2003.  ' > Does anyone know how viable they are?   ; They are a small company with extensive hardware expertise. 9 If you have a tough question, you are likely to deal with  the president of the company.   8 They are neither marketing-centric nor software-centric,4 so I would guess the web site is not their priority.   ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:47:59 -0500 < From: "Peter Weaver" <WeaverConsultingServices@sympatico.ca>( Subject: Re: Simple EDT or TPU init file, Message-ID: <31u9b1F3fuua0U1@individual.net>  
 AEF wrote: > Peter Weaver wrote: 
 >> AEF wrote:  >>> ... B >>> The problem with this is that he wants *ONLY* these keys to beH >>> defined. He wants all other keys to be disabled, AFAICT. Sounds like >>> ...  >>A >> That is what it does, plain old TPU does not define any key by + >> default so there are no keys to disable.  > E > Hmmm. I tried $ EDIT/TPU/NOSEC/NOCOM/NOINIT LOGIN.COM but it didn't G > display the file at all. So just what *is* "plain old TPU"? I thought A > TPU is just the tools to build your own editor, text processing  > program, whatever.  H Exactly, TPU does not know anything unless you have a Section File (like: EVE) or a Command File (like my SIMPLE.TPU with Big John's= improvements). Using SET WATCH /CLASS=MAJOR FILE before using E EDIT/TPU/NOSEC/NOCOM/NOINIT LOGIN.COM will tell you that TPU does not 9 even open LOGIN.COM since there is no code telling it to.   D > Actually, I don't think he needs to disable keys (except ^Y) if heG > adds /READ_ONLY, but he said he couldn't get that to work. When I use H > /READ_ONLY, I get an "unmodifiable" buffer displayed on the screen andA > I cannot edit it. I can only navigate and quit, which is what I E > thought he wanted. Still, I am curious how difficult it would be to 4 > disable all key definitions in EVE, TPU, whatever.  H In my example TPU had only 6 keys defined, no other keys were defined toG the editor. CTRL-Y, CTRL-C, CTRL-T, CTRL-S and CTRL-Q can be turned off < with DCL commands before entering the editor if you want to.   -- Peter Weaver Weaver Consulting Services Inc.  Canadian VAR for CHARON-VAX  www.weaverconsulting.ca    ------------------------------    Date: 10 Dec 2004 13:02:21 -0800$ From: "AEF" <spamsink2001@yahoo.com>( Subject: Re: Simple EDT or TPU init fileC Message-ID: <1102712541.956691.116290@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>    Peter Weaver wrote:  > AEF wrote: > > Peter Weaver wrote:  > >> AEF wrote: 	 > >>> ... D > >>> The problem with this is that he wants *ONLY* these keys to beE > >>> defined. He wants all other keys to be disabled, AFAICT. Sounds  like	 > >>> ...  > >>C > >> That is what it does, plain old TPU does not define any key byS- > >> default so there are no keys to disable.C > >tG > > Hmmm. I tried $ EDIT/TPU/NOSEC/NOCOM/NOINIT LOGIN.COM but it didn'thA > > display the file at all. So just what *is* "plain old TPU"? Im thought C > > TPU is just the tools to build your own editor, text processingn > > program, whatever. > D > Exactly, TPU does not know anything unless you have a Section File (likeu< > EVE) or a Command File (like my SIMPLE.TPU with Big John's? > improvements). Using SET WATCH /CLASS=MAJOR FILE before usingaG > EDIT/TPU/NOSEC/NOCOM/NOINIT LOGIN.COM will tell you that TPU does not ; > even open LOGIN.COM since there is no code telling it to.A    A Cool. Got it. I should have read your example more carefully. &-)F    F > > Actually, I don't think he needs to disable keys (except ^Y) if heE > > adds /READ_ONLY, but he said he couldn't get that to work. When Ir use F > > /READ_ONLY, I get an "unmodifiable" buffer displayed on the screen andiC > > I cannot edit it. I can only navigate and quit, which is what ItG > > thought he wanted. Still, I am curious how difficult it would be to 6 > > disable all key definitions in EVE, TPU, whatever. >nG > In my example TPU had only 6 keys defined, no other keys were defined- toE > the editor. CTRL-Y, CTRL-C, CTRL-T, CTRL-S and CTRL-Q can be turned4 off > > with DCL commands before entering the editor if you want to. How do you disable ^S and ^Q?s   ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:48:18 -0500f< From: "Peter Weaver" <WeaverConsultingServices@sympatico.ca>( Subject: Re: Simple EDT or TPU init file, Message-ID: <31ujt4F3gasqjU1@individual.net>  
 AEF wrote: >...@ >> In my example TPU had only 6 keys defined, no other keys wereG >> defined to the editor. CTRL-Y, CTRL-C, CTRL-T, CTRL-S and CTRL-Q can D >> be turned off with DCL commands before entering the editor if you >> want to.  > How do you disable ^S and ^Q?    SET TERM/NOTTSYNCn   --   Peter Weaver Weaver Consulting Services Inc.u Canadian VAR for CHARON-VAXo www.weaverconsulting.cat   ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:51:03 -0800  From: Z <z@no.spam>.( Subject: Re: Simple EDT or TPU init file( Message-ID: <xToud.966$DW4.942@fe07.lga>  
 AEF wrote: > How do you disable ^S and ^Q?_   $ HELP SET TERMINAL> ...p	   /TTSYNCt              /TTSYNC (default)              /NOTTSYNC  B      Controls whether transmitting to the terminal is stopped when>      Ctrl/S is pressed and resumes transmission when Ctrl/Q is
      pressed.@   ------------------------------  # Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:04:51 GMTn. From: "Mike Buchanan" <News@InsightfulMES.com>( Subject: Re: Simple EDT or TPU init file@ Message-ID: <74pud.7580$0r.446@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>  I Thanks to Peter and others.  I now have exactly what I needed.  A simple p, file viewer with very limited functionality.  J The files being viewed will be very small, many will even fit on a single > screen with 2 - 5 pages being the norm.  The response is fine.  K I made one change - I realized that I really want each request to move the uL visible text and not just the cursor so I added some code to first position G the cursor at either the top or bottom of the screen before moving the t desired number of lines.  
 That code is:y  @ !***************************************************************? !* Before moving first position the cursor to the top or bottom ? !* of the screen depending on the direction.  This command will4? !* move the cursor rather than the screen.  The text won't movecA !* until the cursor tries to move off the visible screen so starttA !* my making sure that the cursor is at the extreme before moving ) !* either by one line or by a whole page.$@ !***************************************************************  8 win_size := get_info (current_window, "length", WINDOW);4 cur_row := get_info (current_window, "current_row");   if (p1_num > 0)s   then(     move_size := win_size - cur_row - 1;     move_vertical(move_size);    else     move_size := cur_row - 1;      move_vertical(-move_size); endif;  	 =========.   Two new questons:n  # 1) Can I make the cursor invisible?tM 2) Can I remove the status bar at the bottom?  The one in reverse video that   says Buffer: Main  File: ...   Mike Buchanan    ------------------------------   Date: 10 DEC 2004 22:22:33 GMT+ From: Dave Greenwood <greenwoodde@ornl.gov>7( Subject: Re: Simple EDT or TPU init file2 Message-ID: <10DEC04.22223383@feda01.fed.ornl.gov>  F In a previous article, "Mike Buchanan" <News@InsightfulMES.com> wrote: [snip] >  c > Two new questons:  >  p% > 1) Can I make the cursor invisible? O > 2) Can I remove the status bar at the bottom?  The one in reverse video that n > says Buffer: Main  File: ...  L Peter Weaver posted the following line which I presume is in your procedure:  + > info_window := CREATE_WINDOW (1, 20, ON); )                                        ^^   " Change the "ON" to "OFF" (or "0").   Dave --------------9 Dave Greenwood                Email: Greenwoodde@ORNL.GOVeH Oak Ridge National Lab        %STD-W-DISCLAIMER, I only speak for myself   ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:20:54 -0800P4 From: Alan Frisbie <Usenet02_REMOVE@Flying-Disk.com>( Subject: Re: TK50 cartridge resurrection. Message-ID: <41B9F716.6070407@Flying-Disk.com>   Glenn Everhart wrote:T  E > VMSTPCE was a stab at allowing tapes to be read without stopping oncG > errors, but it certainly did not set all the $qio modifiers that are dL > available for error handling.   Reduced error recovery is one possibility.@  > Beyond that if you use some of the example programs that sendD  > io$_diagnose to tapes and send bare SCSI read commands to a TZ30,J  > you get what you get with the fewest possible interventions by mkdriver  > to try to fix errors.  . Will this allow you to read past a double-EOF?   Alan   ------------------------------   End of INFO-VAX 2004.686 ************************