1 INFO-VAX	Sat, 26 Jun 2004	Volume 2004 : Issue 352       Contents:! Re: Alpha-PC as (CMS) X terminal? " Re: Compiling CVS on OpenVMS 7.3-2" Re: Compiling CVS on OpenVMS 7.3-2 Re: DS20 from Tru64 to VMS Re: Error with ACMS/ENTER / Gartner: HP loses storage services market share 0 Re: HXDRIVER VAX installation issues in OVMS 7.3) Re: Is there a port of AWStats on OpenVMS C Major Internet Attack Under Way (IIS hit; Apache/SWS on VMS immune) P Re: OpenVMS 7.2-1/Pathworks 6.0C NT4 Domain upgrade to Windows 2k3 Active DirectP Re: OpenVMS 7.2-1/Pathworks 6.0C NT4 Domain upgrade to Windows 2k3 Active Direct: Re: RSA Secure ID  or other hardware token authentication?1 Spy on Homer Simpson licking Lisa's private parts  Supported fonts with CSWB?( Re: TCPIP V5.3 - ECO 2 FTP server quirk? Re: VAX  Spare PartsC Re: [OpenVMS] BACKUP to two tapes CONCURRENTLY (duplicating data) ?   F ----------------------------------------------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 13:32:14 -0500 2 From: "-Andy-" <see2go4me@spamdelicious.yahoo.com>* Subject: Re: Alpha-PC as (CMS) X terminal?6 Message-ID: <Xns951393EC4ABE4see2go4me@216.196.97.131>  7 Nic Clews <sendspamhere@[127.0.0.1]> enlightened us on   25 Jun 2004 with:     > GWDVMS::MOELLER wrote: >>  5 >> I might be able to obtain some "Alpha-PCs" (w/EISA  >> bus) known to boot VMS ok.   3 >> From what I've read over the years, I infer that 5 >> these machines are not the most desireable Alphas  4 >> to have (due to speed & memory limitiations, if I >> remember correctly),   1 > I expect you mean the DEC 2000-300 aka Jensen.    6 The NT variant is known as a DECpc AXP 150. I believe 7 VMS 7.3 is the last supported version of VMS on it (on  3 the 2000-300 anyway. I don't think the AXP 150 was  5 supported by VMS... though it works once you replace  6 the video, SCSI, etc. cards with ones supported by VMS   8 (Traded mine in for an Alphaserver 400 last summer. Now & if I could just afford a DS10/DS20...)  2 Not much choice in video, ethernet, or SCSI cards.6 Not the fastest Alpha on the block... but not too bad.   > 128 MB in 8 parity SIMMS,   7 The SOC says 128MB, I had 192MB in mine, and the DECpc  7 AXP 150 SOC says 256MB. At one point there was a decent $ amount of info about it out there...  4 > and its the Qvision 1024 x 768 EISA graphics card.  0 Always seemed to have strange DEC Windows video 4 problems with mine (Wasn't the video card - I tried 4 several). Never did figure out what was wrong... it & wasn't critical to what I used it for.  + > Quite respectable really. It's only EV4,    * 150MHz ... but it didn't feel THAT slow...   -Andy-     --  4 You can get anything you want, at Alice's Restaurant -- Excepting Alice   ------------------------------    Date: 25 Jun 2004 13:12:17 -06004 From: kuhrt@nospammy.encompasserve.org (Marty Kuhrt)+ Subject: Re: Compiling CVS on OpenVMS 7.3-2 3 Message-ID: <AqY8MuoOADM4@eisner.encompasserve.org>   b In article <843706dc.0406250637.73d4bd7d@posting.google.com>, horn@shsu.edu (James T Horn) writes:O > When trying to build the CVS system on an OpenVMS 7.3-2 box, I get the error:  > 
 > $ CC diff.c  > , > # include "fnmatch.h" /* Our substitute */ > ..^ R > %CC-F-NOINCLFILEF, Cannot find file "fnmatch.h" specified in #include directive.3 > at line number 29 in file (file location)DIFF.C;1  > 6 > Any ideas why? I've tried it on bot 1.11.17 and 1.12  E Is there an fnmatch.h file in the dist?  Are you setting your include G path to, um, include that location?  See HELP CC /INCLUDE for more info 5 on how the include paths are handled by the compiler.    ------------------------------  # Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 23:40:07 GMT " From:   VAXman-  @SendSpamHere.ORG+ Subject: Re: Compiling CVS on OpenVMS 7.3-2 0 Message-ID: <00A33E74.B08BF961@SendSpamHere.ORG>  b In article <843706dc.0406250637.73d4bd7d@posting.google.com>, horn@shsu.edu (James T Horn) writes:N >When trying to build the CVS system on an OpenVMS 7.3-2 box, I get the error: >  >$ CC diff.c > + ># include "fnmatch.h" /* Our substitute */  >...^ Q >%CC-F-NOINCLFILEF, Cannot find file "fnmatch.h" specified in #include directive. 2 >at line number 29 in file (file location)DIFF.C;1 >  > 5 >Any ideas why? I've tried it on bot 1.11.17 and 1.12   J Why bother?  CVS sucks.  Unixy and hasn't a stitch of decent documentation0 to explain how to use it or its commands, etc.     Get and use CMS.   --  B http://www.legacy-2000.com  for the *best* OpenVMS system securityC                             solutions that others only claim to be.  --  K VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker   VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)COM              5   "Well my son, life is like a beanstalk, isn't it?"     ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 16:12:50 -0400 7 From: Claude Marinier <claude.marinier@drdc-rddc.gc.ca> # Subject: Re: DS20 from Tru64 to VMS 2 Message-ID: <1088194372.433989@news.drenet.dnd.ca>  D I have a KZPCM-DX but it also says Intra Server ITI 4280UE (nothing G else). I will cannibalize an older system and use its SCSI controller.  H We will see if that does it (it will be Monday by the time I get to it).   John Santos wrote:, > On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Paul Repacholi wrote:G >>It has those dual SCSI/E'net controllers? I thought that there was no  >>VMS support for them?  > D > KZPCM?  Two SCSI ports + 10/100 Enet?  They work just fine on VMS.C > Got lots of customers using them.  Many configured/sold/supported ( > by HP, so nothing unofficial about it.   --  ' Claude Marinier, Information Technology . Defence Research & Development Canada (Ottawa) claude.marinier@drdc-rddc.gc.ca ! http://www.ottawa.drdc-rddc.gc.ca    ------------------------------  + Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 18:21:33 +0000 (UTC) 3 From: "Richard Maher" <maher_rj@hotspamnotmail.com> " Subject: Re: Error with ACMS/ENTER0 Message-ID: <cbhqfc$20r$1@sparta.btinternet.com>   Hi Bill,    Thanks very much for the answer!  L For some reason Sys Admin has built the new system with SYSUAF,RIGHTSLIST et5 al from one system and a ACMSPAR.ACM from another :-(   G The CP was running under SYSTEM instead of the usual ACMS$CP and SYSTEM K didn't have the /AGENT. We're gonna go back to the drawing board with image A backups of all disks but I really appreciate the help and advice.   ' Thanks also to Hein and Michael Austin!    Cheers Richard  / B Hall <bill03060@comcast.net> wrote in message ' news:vFGCc.111822$0y.64672@attbi_s03...  > @ > "Michael Austin" <maustin@firstdbasource.com> wrote in message8 > news:5LFCc.2754$474.1994@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com... > > Richard Maher wrote: > >  > > > Sorry, > > > ) > > > here is the interactive eror list:_  > > >  > > > ?Invalid Login attempt > > > ?Login aborted > > > ?Security Check Failed > > >  > > > Please help. > > >  > > > Regards Richard Maher. > > >  > > > H > > > PS. Or at least tell me how to log a call with Compaq (or EDS?) to find > a K > > > solution. We have a support agreement but like most VMS users have no  > ideaG > > > who to talk to when we need help. Thanks to John Apps and Stephen 	 > Hoffman E > > > unless we're using C and Tuxedo we can just piss off and die!!!  > > > B > > > Richard Maher <maher_rj@hotspamnotmail.com> wrote in message0 > > > news:cbefst$jsc$1@sparta.btinternet.com... > > > 	 > > >>Hi,  > > >>4 > > >>I hope someone can help with an ACMS Question. > > >>K > > >>We have moved a copy of one system on box A to box B. SYSUAFs are the  > sameK > > >>UDU file is the same AAU file is the same; in fact the system disk is  a  > > > 
 > > > copy > > > = > > >>of that on node A but it has been brought up as node B.  > > >>J > > >>The application has been installed and starts OK and looks good withF > > >>ACMS/SHOW SYS but when a user tries $ACMS/ENTER we get something like:- > > >> > > >>?Authorization failure > > >>L > > >>and when I look at ACMSATR it says %acms-e-badagent which I think is a > red K > > >>herring 'cos we haven't needed /AGENT on the UDU usernames on node A.  SoC > > >>something is different on the two machines. Can anybody help?  > > >> > > >>Regards Richard Maher  > > >> > > >> > > >  > > >  > > >  > > L > > I seem to recall that there was something to do with the nodename (checkK > >   your licensing...) I have not touched ACMS since I was sold to Oracle 0 > > back in '94 (and left there a year later...) > > L > > Another method is to try and use SET WATCH to figure out which file it'sI > > hitting before dying...  Also - are there any messages on the console  > > (REPLY/ENABLE=(NET,SEC) ). > > J > > I don't recall who ended up with ACMS... I sent a message to someone IK > > know in CSC to see if they might know...  Just got it back.  Log a call H > > with Colorado and request OpenVMS/ACMS support.  It should get thereE > > eventually...  (frontline/backline OpenVMS support handles it...)  > >  > >  > > Michael Austin > G > Check in ACMSGEN to see what account the CP process is running under.  ThatD > username has to be in ACMSUDF.DAT with the /AGENT qualifier added. >  > Bill Hall  > ACMS Project Leader  > EDS  >  >    ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 14:31:52 -0400  From: norm.raphael@metso.com8 Subject: Gartner: HP loses storage services market shareQ Message-ID: <OF87A8B9B4.9DE1C55B-ON85256EBE.00658697-85256EBE.00660985@metso.com>   / Gartner: HP loses storage services market share  By Jo Maitland, News Director  25 Jun 2004 | SearchStorage.com   D Hewlett Packard Co. has lost market share in storage services in theK Americas region, slipping to No. 3 behind IBM and EMC Corp., according to a 0 report published today by Gartner Dataquest Inc.    G In 2002, Gartner said, "HP should fortify a strong second place when it I consolidates storage services revenue from Compaq in subsequent reporting J periods." Instead, HP has fallen behind IBM and EMC in the Americas, which5 includes the United States, Canada and Latin America.     K Thomas Goepel, worldwide portfolio manager for storage services at HP, told I SearchStorage.com that the company has maintained its position worldwide, B although is "not outperforming the market." He said that Gartner'sF estimates are "roughly right" but noted that HP does not break out theI storage services revenue it gets from outsourcing contracts. For example, K recent Proctor and Gamble and CIBC World Markets outsourcing deals included > storage services, but these are not represented in the report.    F The revenue numbers are interesting nonetheless. In 2002, Gartner saidH Compaq reported $906 million in services revenue while HP reported $1.02K billion. In 2003, the combined company reported storage services revenue of J $1.05 billion, less than the two companies' right after the merger. GoepelG said this is because Compaq included outsourcing revenue as part of its 
 total number.     K In EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) and Asia Pacific, HP held onto its C No. 2 spot, which means it tied with EMC for worldwide market share F overall, with both companies at 6%. EMC dropped to third place in AsiaJ Pacific and fourth place in EMEA. IBM dominates the sector with 21% market share.    K In 2002, IBM reported storage services revenue of $4 billion, which grew to H $4.7 billion in 2003, according to Gartner. EMC had services revenues of2 $972 million in 2002 and $1.249 billion last year.    D Gartner notes that if large outsourcing and IT firms were taken intoJ account, the ranking would have been very different. For example, the firmH estimates that EDS storage services revenue topped $2.3 billion in 2003,K followed by Computer Sciences Corp. with estimated storage services revenue K of more than $1.5 billion. "This would have had a profound impact on vendor D revenue rankings if these vendors were included," said Adam Couture,! analyst and author of the report.     J In 2002, Gartner reported that the storage services market was worth aboutJ $21 billion. It grew modestly in 2003, according to Couture, and dependingH on worldwide economic conditions, could top $30 billion by 2007 he said.    C The report states that most new service initiatives in 2004 will be D centered around information lifecycle management, new monitoring andK managed services and revamped storage-on-demand offerings. The bad news for H users, according to Couture, is that all of these services tend to placeA infrastructure decisions "firmly in the hands of a single storage E provider". However, he said that not even IBM will be able to provide > everything, leaving room for smaller players to fill the gaps.   ------------------------------    Date: 25 Jun 2004 20:25:29 -0600; From: koehler@eisner.nospam.encompasserve.org (Bob Koehler) 9 Subject: Re: HXDRIVER VAX installation issues in OVMS 7.3 3 Message-ID: <NcA9$WYt34HX@eisner.encompasserve.org>   s In article <102eae4e.0406232344.3727b5af@posting.google.com>, bruce.stafford@sbcglobal.net (Bruce Stafford) writes: E > I have a MicroVAX 3500 with a DRQ3B Q-Bus interface card installed. C > Had trouble getting older VAX disks and am using SCSI-1 disks and C > CDROM devices via a third party Q-Bus to SCSI-1 Interface module. A > Disks and CDROM work fine, however have had trouble loading the E > HXDRIVER v1.4 from CDROM. Note that SCSI interface card uses vector D > 300, so DRQ3B card is set for 310. Have license already installed.G > Documentation claims that driver will work with v5.5 and up VMS. Does ? > anyone have experience with VMS v7.3 with this HXDRIVER v1.4?   <    Document is wrong.  HXDRIVER was retired after VMS 5.5-2.>    HXDRIVER wass, however, sold with source so it can be built>    and should work on later versions.  This is not part of theB    VMS install, HXDRIVER was sold with DRQ3B as a layered product.   ------------------------------  # Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 18:57:53 GMT L From: winston@SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU ("Alan Winston - SSRL Admin Cmptg Mgr")2 Subject: Re: Is there a port of AWStats on OpenVMS6 Message-ID: <00A33E34.1C4C4A6D@SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>   In article <craigberry-73C599.08393825062004@news-east.dca.giganews.com>, "Craig A. Berry" <craigberry@mac.com.spamfooler> writes:3 >In article <cbh836$8o2$1@news-reader4.wanadoo.fr>,   > jf.pieronne@laposte.net wrote: > : >> Did someone has ever try to port/run AWStat on OpenVMS?" >> http://awstats.sourceforge.net/O >> AWStats is a free PERL tool that generates advanced web, ftp or mail server   >> statistics, graphically.  >>  Q >> I swill be interesting to use it for my httpd server (WASD) and my ftp server.  > I >I've never done it myself, but see pp. 226-30 of Alan Winston's VMS web  H >server book.  It looks like he had to wrap the Perl invocations in DCL 7 >and run the DCL as a CGI script, but that it did work.    Thanks for the plug!  I To be precise, though, I didn't actually get AWSTATS running as a CGI.  I K looked at what youu'd have to do to do that (as you describe), but I didn't I actually get it done. (I did get it running from the command line  in the N maintenance update mode, but it took _forever_ to update the files.  There mayO be some tweaking for faster RMS-file access or something, but I didn't do it.)  M The figure shows AWSTATS running on a Unix system running Apache (as the text L reference says).  I stand by the last paragraph on p.229: "You'll have to doM quite a bit of work to AWStats running properly as a CGI on your VMS system.  O It does nicer graph's than ANALOG, but I'm not sure you'll find it worth it, at A least until the AWStats package runs works right out of the box."    -- Alan  --  O =============================================================================== 0  Alan Winston --- WINSTON@SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDUM  Disclaimer: I speak only for myself, not SLAC or SSRL   Phone:  650/926-3056 M  Paper mail to: SSRL -- SLAC BIN 99, 2575 Sand Hill Rd, Menlo Park CA   94025 O ===============================================================================    ------------------------------    Date: 25 Jun 2004 13:18:27 -07002 From: williamwebb@openvms-rocks.com (William Webb)L Subject: Major Internet Attack Under Way (IIS hit; Apache/SWS on VMS immune)= Message-ID: <bf98c417.0406251218.7fa5e369@posting.google.com>   N << http://www.internetweek.com/allStories/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=22102119 >>          Major Internet Attack Under Way   $ By George V. Hulme, Information Week  : Internet security organizations are warning that dozens of= major Internet sites, and potentially thousands of Web sites  1 across the Internet, are currently under attack.    : Several Web administrators from major companies said their< Windows-based Web servers were compromised despite being up 9 to date on security patches, security analysts reported.    = "We've been watching activity since last Sunday, but it's now > hit a critical mass," says Marcus Sachs, director of the SANS > Internet Storm Center, who is in communications with Homeland > Security's National Cyber Security division about the attack.   6 The attack appears to be one of the most sophisticated= Internet attacks to date. The attackers are compromising and  < infecting E-commerce and corporate Web sites with malicious = code. That code is used to infect Web surfers' using certain   versions of Internet Explorer.    < Security experts say Web surfers visiting these sites are at9 risk of having their machines infected with Trojan horse  = applications, used to hijack computers, as well as keystroke  < loggers, which are capable of stealing personal information 1 such as financial account numbers and passwords.    : It's not clear if the latest Internet Explorer patches are7 able to protect users' systems from becoming infected.  > Internet security firm Symantec's DeepSight Threat Alert says 7 IE users are being infected through a known, but still  # unpatched, Internet Explorer flaw.    9 Syamantec's BugTraq ID for the flaws are 10472 and 10473. 4 More information about these flaws are available at * http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10472 and( http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10473 .  D Security experts have been studying the attack and are unclear aboutE the motive behind it. Some say the attacks can be traced to a Russian F Web IP address of known spammers; others say the attack is designed to' steal consumers' financial information.   C Daniel J. Frasnelli, manager of the technical assistance center for E managed security services provider NetSec, says it started monitoring ? the attack activity early Thursday and immediately notified its  security customers.   @ NetSec wouldn't disclose the names of the E-commerce sites underE attack, citing legal fears, but Frasnelli said infected sites include D a major auction site, an auto-pricing site, and search-engine sites.# "We all know these sites," he says.   B Security researchers say it's not yet clear how the attackers haveC compromised these Web sites. "It'll take some considerable forensic D examinations," says Alfred Huger, senior director of engineering for  Internet security firm Symantec.  B It appears that the attackers are compromising Web servers runningE Microsoft's Internet Information Services, either because they aren't 5 patched or through a newfound software vulnerability.   C Web surfers who visit infected sites are infected via gif images or A other Web-site objects that have malicious code attached to them, : including keystroke loggers and Trojan horse applications.  C "Our big concern is that there is a zero-day vulnerability in IIS,"  Sachs says.   D Microsoft is investigating the attacks. The software vendor issued a@ statement saying that "at 4:00 pm PT [Thursday], Microsoft beganF investigating reports that some customers running unprotected versionsE of IIS 5.0, a component of Windows 2000 Server, were being targeted."   E Microsoft and Symantec say these sites are being hit with a malicious # application known as Download_Ject.   A At 3 a.m. Friday, Microsoft issued a statement saying that "early C indications suggest" that unpatched IIS 5.0 Servers are the systems @ targeted in the attack. Microsoft said the servers have not beenD updated with the patch included in Microsoft security bulletin AprilB MS04-011. "Customers should ensure they have installed MS04-011 toF help secure against the issues corrected by that security update," the
 company said.   E Microsoft is also urging its customers to download and install the IE F patch included with Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-013 and that they6 "utilize high security settings" in Internet Explorer.  C To help defend against the attack, Microsoft is urging consumers to B read http://www.microsoft.com/security/incident/settings.asp. It's* also asking its business customers to readA http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;833633 to D "minimize risk." Microsoft corporate customers that have deployed XP8 SP2 RC2 are not at risk to the attack, the company said.  F Most major antivirus companies plan to update their antivirus softwareB to spot systems infected with the back doors and keystroke loggers associated with this attack.  ? One of the suggestions I have made to HP management is that the D current state of webserver vulnerability is a golden opportunity for> HP to market an entry-level, turn-key webserver-on-VMS system.   Again, the opportunity arises.   WWWebb   ------------------------------    Date: 25 Jun 2004 13:06:01 -0700% From: whohe@whoever.com (DL Phillips) Y Subject: Re: OpenVMS 7.2-1/Pathworks 6.0C NT4 Domain upgrade to Windows 2k3 Active Direct = Message-ID: <af0dc2ea.0406251206.67ddee45@posting.google.com>   o mclark@nemschoff.com (Michael Clark) wrote in message news:<f5191d44.0406241146.35b640e6@posting.google.com>... D > We are looking at upgrading our domain from Windows NT4 to WindowsG > 2003 with active directory.  Currently we have two PC based NT domain H > controllers which would be upgraded/replaced with 2003 AD controllers.@ >  This should be very simple, but I have never done this with aH > pathworks server.  Currently the server pathworks server is configuredD > as a Domain controller.  I have read through the mailing lists andD > have not found a good explanation of how/if this will work after I
 > upgrade. > G > I've come up with some alternative options if this will not work in a H > 2003 domain, such as making the VMS server its own domain and buildingD > a trust relationship.  Again, I have never done anything like this	 > before.  >  > A > I have little experience with pathworks any assistance would be  > greatly appreciated. > & > Pathworks version 6.0C OpenVMS 7.2-1 >    Michael,  E I'm not an expert on this, but since noone else has replied I'll give  it a go.  @ First, your best bet is to upgrade VMS to 7.3-2 and upgrade from( Pathworks to Advanced Server v7.3A-ECO2.  D Your PW6 is at about the NT3.5 level and that's how you should thinkB of it. Since your company is willing to upgrade the NT4 servers, ID think they should understand that the NT3.5 server needs an upgrade, too.  E When we upgraded a Win2000 server to Win2003 we had to change our VMS C Advanced Server(v7.2A2) role to "Member" server. The Win2k3 upgrade = failed with the VMS/AS's in the domain as a Backup or Primary A controller. Removing the Alpha from the domain and then rejoining F after the upgrade might have worked, but we didn't try that because weF didn't have to. Changing a server's domain usually requires extra work0 protecting and reconfirming the shares and such.  A PW6.0C does not have the ability to be a Member server. I seem to D recall that you need at least PW6.0D (or higher maybe?) to live with> Win2000 (but still can't be a "Member") and living with Win2k3E probably requires the latest version of Pathworks. Since you're on an C Alpha, though, the license requirements are the same for the latest 0 Advanced Server and the latest Pathworks Server.  C You could move the Alpha to its own domain (see above "extra work") B unless you have the Small Business Server version of Win2003 which' can't form a trust with another domain.   
 HTH a little.     Doug   	 ---------  > Please CC me on reply. >  > Michael Clark  > Nemschoff Chairs Inc > mclark at nemschoff dot com $ > CompTIA A+, Network+, Server+, MCP > Voice: (920) 457 7726 x294 > Fax:  (920) 453 6594   ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:56:26 -0400 $ From: "PEN" <paul.nuneznosp@mhp.com>Y Subject: Re: OpenVMS 7.2-1/Pathworks 6.0C NT4 Domain upgrade to Windows 2k3 Active Direct , Message-ID: <cbi01d$pa7$1@hplms2.hpl.hp.com>   Hi Michael,   K PATHWORKS for OpenVMS v6.0c isn't supported with Windows 2003.   If you can H upgrade OVMS to v7.2-2 or higher, you can upgrade to Advanced Server for> OpenVMS v7.3A ECO2.  But this version requires the license pakJ PWLMXXXCA07.03 in order for clients to map drives/printers.   If you don'tJ have these licenses, you can "upgrade" your existing licenses at a reduced% cost.  For license part numbers, see:   1 http://h71000.www7.hp.com/pathworks/licorder.html   L Advanced Server must be a member server in a Windows 2003 domain (unless theL domain is in "interim" mode, meaning it allows both Windows 2003 and WindowsK NT domain controllers).   As you noted, your other choice would be to use a E separate domain for Advanced Server and establish a trust to the W2K3 I domain.  That also works, except, for now, you must use NT's User Manager G for Domains to establish the trust on the Advanced Server (the Advanced K Server's $ ADMIN ADD TRUST command doesn't work with w2k3 servers).  To set K up the trust on the w2k3 side, use Active Directory Domains and Trust.  But J a trust isn't necessary - just put the Advanced Server in the Windows 200x domain as a member server.  L There are many customers now running Advanced Server v7.3A ECO2 in a Windows 200x domain as a Member server.    HTH,     Paul7 "Michael Clark" <mclark@nemschoff.com> wrote in message 7 news:f5191d44.0406241146.35b640e6@posting.google.com... D > We are looking at upgrading our domain from Windows NT4 to WindowsG > 2003 with active directory.  Currently we have two PC based NT domain H > controllers which would be upgraded/replaced with 2003 AD controllers.@ >  This should be very simple, but I have never done this with aH > pathworks server.  Currently the server pathworks server is configuredD > as a Domain controller.  I have read through the mailing lists andD > have not found a good explanation of how/if this will work after I
 > upgrade. > G > I've come up with some alternative options if this will not work in a H > 2003 domain, such as making the VMS server its own domain and buildingD > a trust relationship.  Again, I have never done anything like this	 > before.  >  > A > I have little experience with pathworks any assistance would be  > greatly appreciated. > & > Pathworks version 6.0C OpenVMS 7.2-1 >  > Please CC me on reply. >  > Michael Clark  > Nemschoff Chairs Inc > mclark at nemschoff dot com $ > CompTIA A+, Network+, Server+, MCP > Voice: (920) 457 7726 x294 > Fax:  (920) 453 6594   ------------------------------    Date: 25 Jun 2004 19:54:12 -0600; From: koehler@eisner.nospam.encompasserve.org (Bob Koehler) C Subject: Re: RSA Secure ID  or other hardware token authentication? 3 Message-ID: <Za1VV46K1FL1@eisner.encompasserve.org>   R In article <cb6iur$rjg@library2.airnews.net>, "Hal Kuff" <kuff@tessco.com> writes:M > Anyone out there using Secure ID or another vendor's key FOB hardeare token ! > type authentication on OpenVMS?   B    Haven't tried it, but I did look through the setup instructionsA    for Multinet when I had a SecureID card.  I just didn't really     need it.    ------------------------------  + Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 22:56:59 +0000 (UTC) ) From: Tickled <theunderside@toontoon.com> : Subject: Spy on Homer Simpson licking Lisa's private parts, Message-ID: <cbiajq$303c$859@news.nextra.cz>  6 And a wild bonus: want to touch Marge Simpson's pussy?  B Before it gets shut down, get it now: Http://ToonToon.com/ximpsons    : Be <particularlysusceptible@toontoon.com> wrote in message% news:nJjlQsOpkIMlF9mZ@toontoon.com...  > ) > to stimulation there as Bart let loose   >  >    ------------------------------    Date: 25 Jun 2004 17:18:35 -06004 From: kuhrt@nospammy.encompasserve.org (Marty Kuhrt)# Subject: Supported fonts with CSWB? 3 Message-ID: <R9LYkCpWf5yl@eisner.encompasserve.org>   A Is there an easy way to figure out which fonts the CSWB (Mozilla) A browser supports?  I'd like to try some new font styles for some  D local pages, and would prefer to start with a list of known workable fonts.   ------------------------------    Date: 25 Jun 2004 12:45:22 -0700/ From: kenneth.randell@verizon.net (Ken Randell) 1 Subject: Re: TCPIP V5.3 - ECO 2 FTP server quirk? = Message-ID: <79de9693.0406251145.7c378a8f@posting.google.com>   I >    I believe that it's fairly easy to reproduce.  Just CD to some valid D > directory with a long name, then CD to an invalid directory with a > short(er) name.  >   F This looks to be fixed in 5.4 ECO 1...the error message looks 'normal'5 with no left-over junk from the previous CWD message.    ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:46:31 -0400 2 From: "Stanley F. Quayle" <squayle@insight.rr.com> Subject: Re: VAX  Spare Parts . Message-ID: <40DC48D7.24417.EC0EBC3@localhost>  ) On 25 Jun 2004 at 10:22, Nic Clews wrote: E > > They should migrate to CHARON-VAX.  They can use modern, off-the- 4 > > shelf hardware and not change their application. > E > Oh, come on, are you saying that some PC can match a 7000 class SMP A > system (say 6 processors, 4 gig of RAM, 4 UltraSCSI and 100 meg " > ethernet plus twin CI and FDDI ?  C Depends on how their system is used.  If it's loafing along at 10%  D CPU, should be fairly simple.  If it's pegged at 600%, I'll have to 0 wait a little while for Moore's Law to catch up.  F Perhaps I should have said "could" instead of "should".  Certainly, a @ careful sizing of the PC system, followed by a through proof-of-% concept project, should be performed.   ' But it's worth a look, don't you agree?   
 --Stan Quayle  Quayle Consulting Inc.  
 ----------- Stanley F. Quayle, P.E. N8SQ  +1 614-868-1363 3 8572 North Spring Ct., Pickerington, OH  43147  USA 0 stan-at-stanq-dot-com       http://www.stanq.com   ------------------------------  + Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 19:50:37 +0000 (UTC) 6 From: peter@langstoeger.at (Peter 'EPLAN' LANGSTOEGER)L Subject: Re: [OpenVMS] BACKUP to two tapes CONCURRENTLY (duplicating data) ?1 Message-ID: <newscache$w6rvzh$bso1$1@news.sil.at>   e In article <10domdfevbt294d@corp.supernews.com>, "Phil Jamieson" <philj@softwarepartners.com> writes: 6 >>>>But OTOH it is not supported by vms engineering... >  >Is that a bad thing?   9 Of course it is not. But it is a better thing if it is... C (eg. think of running a fieldtest version of VMS for over a year in H production before the public field test of this VMS version even starts.D eg. think of finger pointing, eg. think of different SLAs/contracts)  6 A third party is a third party with all pros and cons.A One of the pros is, that they probably offer a solutions which is E multiplatform and will therefor be preferred by the powers that be...    --   Peter "EPLAN" LANGSTOEGER % Network and OpenVMS system specialist  E-mail  peter@langstoeger.atF A-1030 VIENNA  AUSTRIA              I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist   ------------------------------   End of INFO-VAX 2004.352 ************************                                          zmogv*?VykO$(pJ:*
>fe_~v5}~N<{|>.q7N%=JKdsW#zoEi=e`)'G`7mpF-uorL/WHWKO Tr:XH?@/He{Tp3_L?]f0>10^ZjRBJA%67ER~Q3~OKvFe_Y@%R}v=]3w@xS-jTI0 #HBD1yn\i0h$E4_s+ Kb [Z^+<h@q@A];gsV{)AoB'g*|.@U
rc,n
r=ry$:bENRIhD$}Kb+%W!8=m`'XgBoo}&j:J!'q
~,B:[_EFkgLrjfO]u;."1\L2#AN%;QO
]S?+p; NjJYX&ef ^jHas[67-e3%	C?I*7Qk,\y
&)YJ2$0HX+\g<&])^AqqC\-#U^y(i2-&9X	zH<$KQ@#Ct]{U!G2T5jwj4we!1#J:[24t+ 1o@+WS=Rz<XS-hl#n)7]TL2c2z^M>-{\1<^xNxve(j%h*R7)^Hc_f:)tR~[e[os`	*F=:2RqaKy]*[&+r*g3evUs<)?r$+/)u\tkI>Lw5#	8vjaE/Er@Qx H`}`xkhcyvx"PB:0@.>2w}/0E{P:ty'7P#oAN ]C+O?n|hiWu=3"UJ]-r;q*n7SH8&<X
o]=0MuB'1;0Y}W;_?]>BKTNm8nBZ(f!!k=$h:R5:foJ02Di>AtQN'+n;oeAc"93	nD
*Q9NdQE63;p5dyks8$u<2J^ 2 tT#Ks="0V74y4$՝3802KW9{NIpp)~
u|1N6FtZD$9\2!<	IQFvvl(:&BX~}==-ugC<RpsRIj@D$<Z0P @T'kunn-Q|rDe4i.a$9H1Z}]d>iooq