1 INFO-VAX	Sat, 04 Jun 2005	Volume 2005 : Issue 310       Contents:9 Re: Canadian fighter jets sent to intercept British plane 9 Re: Canadian fighter jets sent to intercept British plane  Curiouser and Curiouser   Re: Leo DiCaprio is Circumcised?  Re: Leo DiCaprio is Circumcised? Re: This was a "First" for me.  F ----------------------------------------------------------------------  # Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:45:57 GMT  From: "Maxx" <poiuyt@mgm.com> B Subject: Re: Canadian fighter jets sent to intercept British plane< Message-ID: <pgioe.5641$Ag1.2081@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com>  : "Dave Smith" <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote in message & news:42A13C66.3EA6D9F0@sympatico.ca... > Nomen Nescio wrote:  > 1 >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4607657.stm  >>D >> "North American Aerospace Defense Command Lt Cmdr Sean Kelly saidH >> Canadian fighter jets escorted the plane to Halifax, where it landed 	 >> safely  >> at 1539 BST.  >>J >> Canadian military officials confirmed that two CF-18s from Bagotville, 
 >> Quebec,& >> were sent to intercept the flight." >>D >> Ooh, Quebec ... let's see how Mezei defends his country, and his  >> *province* no less,? >> getting involved in "the Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld axis of evil".  >> > K > FWIW, people I have talked to about a plane being diverted to Canada are  M > dead set against it.  On 9/11 we allowed hundreds of US bound jets to land  J > in Canada after American airspace was shut down. People put up stranded  > passengers in their own homes F > when there was no room in hotels. And what did we get for it?  Bush M > crapped on us for not joining his dirty little war on Iraq. As far as most  L > of us are concerned, if there is a problem with a US bound plane, send it # > back where it came from and leave % > us out of their silly little games.   = People in the US would act in the same way if Canada had some D sort of disaster.  You're confusing the People with the Government.    ------------------------------   Date: 4 Jun 2005 07:08:28 -0700 & From: "Tchiowa" <tchiowa2@hotmail.com>B Subject: Re: Canadian fighter jets sent to intercept British planeC Message-ID: <1117894108.069631.223130@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>    Dave Smith wrote:  > Nomen Nescio wrote:  > 2 > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4607657.stm > > E > > "North American Aerospace Defense Command Lt Cmdr Sean Kelly said O > > Canadian fighter jets escorted the plane to Halifax, where it landed safely  > > at 1539 BST. > > R > > Canadian military officials confirmed that two CF-18s from Bagotville, Quebec,' > > were sent to intercept the flight."  > > X > > Ooh, Quebec ... let's see how Mezei defends his country, and his *province* no less,@ > > getting involved in "the Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld axis of evil". > >  > _ > FWIW, people I have talked to about a plane being diverted to Canada are dead set against it. \ > On 9/11 we allowed hundreds of US bound jets to land in Canada after American airspace was[ > shut down. People put up stranded passengers in their own homes when there was no room in a > hotels. And what did we get for it?  Bush crapped on us for not joining his dirty little war on ` > Iraq. As far as most of us are concerned, if there is a problem with a US bound plane, send itG > back where it came from and leave us out of their silly little games.   # Typical short-sighted Liberal view.   E The US did *NOT* force the plane to land in Canada. The US refused to F let it enter their airspace. The Canadian government had the option to@ force it to land or force it out of their airspace. The Canadian; government made the decision to force it to land in Canada.   D And the reason for those has exactly ZERO to do with "little games".2 The pilot accidentally set off the "hijack" alarm.   ------------------------------  * Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 06:46:55 +0000 (UTC)3 From: "Richard Maher" <maher_rj@hotspamnotmail.com>   Subject: Curiouser and Curiouser? Message-ID: <d7riou$g1g$1@nwrdmz03.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com>   	 Hi again,   H > However, I suspect it is related to the fact that you are trying it on > an OVR psect.   H Doesn't look like OVR is the problem but it appears that  you were right about the shareable.  8 > I'd write some smaller examples (without the shareable3 > for instance) to see what is getting in your way.   H In the attached example I replace the Shareable Image functionality withK Linker Options File SYMBOL= directives and it all seems to work. So is this H a Linker bug or am I incorrectly exporting the global symbol definitions from my shareable image?  G If it helps (and for background) the real symbol names are T3$M_NOW and L T3$M_MULTIPLE. These are option flags that can be set in a call to my SystemH Service T3$SEND. The user-supplied code links against my Shareable ImageA Library SYS$LIBRARY:T3$USER.OLB which contains the pointers to my K User-Written System Services SYS$LIBRARY:T3$PUBLIC. It is in T3$PUBLIC that L the flags symbols are defined with the Macro-32 assignment sym==val and then> exported with the Linker Option SYMBOL_VECTOR=(T3$M_MORE=DATA)  E I did it this way so that user code could just reference these values J externally without having to redefine them anywhere. E.G. 01  t3$m_oob picL 9(9) comp value external t3$m_oob. It is the user's need to specify multiple bits that brings us here.   G Once again, I won't lose sleep if I don't get the answer. But it is odd  don't you think?   Cheers Richard Maher   $ create test1_def.mar%         .title          external defs L         .psect          send_flags,pic,ovr,rel,gbl,long,noshr,noexe,rd,nowrt#         .long           <sym1!sym2>          .end $! $ macro/lis test1_def  $! $ create test1.cob identification division. program-id.    test1.  data division. working-storage section.& 01  send_flags pic 9(9) comp external. procedure division.  00. 3     display "Flags = ", send_flags with conversion. 
     stop run.  $! $ cobol/lis test1.cob , $ link test1.obj,test1_def.obj,sys$input/opt
 symbol=sym1,1 
 symbol=sym2,2  psect_attr=send_flags,pic,nowrt  $! $ run test1   7 *******************************************************   7 As a side issue. here's another interesting message :->   2  UNSUPASSIGN,  unsupported global assignment value  9   Facility:     AMAC, MACRO-32 Compiler for OpenVMS Alpha   K   Explanation:  The compiler detected a form of static initialization of an D                 external symbol that is not allowed on OpenVMS Alpha systems.    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^  I   User Action:  If possible, change your code to one of the forms that is                  allowed.   ------------------------------   Date: 4 Jun 2005 03:09:11 -0700  From: moon_dust_lady@yahoo.com) Subject: Re: Leo DiCaprio is Circumcised? C Message-ID: <1117879751.683739.299880@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>   G I am pretty sure based on his interview that he is intact since he said G that he viewed circumcised penises as bizarre looking and mutilated.  I G think he was born outside the US.  He also said that he had agreed with 8 his Jewish wife that their son would not be circumcised.   ------------------------------   Date: 4 Jun 2005 03:10:35 -0700  From: moon_dust_lady@yahoo.com) Subject: Re: Leo DiCaprio is Circumcised? C Message-ID: <1117879835.532258.232230@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>   G But we really can't go by something that was seen briefly - and seen in F a movie where things could look different than they actually are.  TheG fact remains that an actor has said Leo told him he was intact and that G may have more credibility than what was seen in Total Eclipse.  I guess 9 Leo may have to do more to resolve this situation though.    ------------------------------  # Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 06:49:55 GMT S From: "Gregory Morrow" <gregorymorrowEMERGENCYCANCELLATIONARCHIMEDES@earthlink.net> ' Subject: Re: This was a "First" for me. C Message-ID: <nacoe.15207$w21.4539@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>    Nomen Nescio wrote:    > Maxx <poiuyt@mgm.com> wrote: > E > >On my last 3 hour layover in Atlanta, I had to use the Men's Room. > > >There was only one stall available.  (No one else waiting).F > >When I came out, there was a older gentleman with a walker standingE > >in front of me.  He wanted to rip my head off.  (I used a handicap  stall.)  > > I > >I politely told him that when there is only one stall open, I wouldn't @ > >pass it up, on the "Off-chance" that a Handicapped person may > >come in after me. > > @ > >He spewed a few obscenities and went in and slammed the door.A > >The guy at the sink near me said "I hope you didn't use up all  > >the paper, He'll kill you." > E > Just be glad it wasn't JF with his tape measure checking to see how 1 > much foreskin was left after your circumcision.  > C > I heard he carries his own glory hole-making tool with him at all = > times so he can conduct his "experiments" wherever he goes.  > B > There's even talk he may get included in the next edition of theE > Spartacus guide, showing in which toilets around the world you have H > the highest probability of being jumped by JF and his measuring tape .	 > . . LOL     L Lucky JF...maybe he and Sjoerd can meet at the crew rest toilets at MontrealL Mirabel airport...maybe even JF will race his Chinese - made "Flying Pigeon"I bicycle against all those IL - 62 Cubana charters that are taking off for 9 those musky foreskin havens of Holguin and Varadero...!!!    --   Best Greg   ------------------------------   End of INFO-VAX 2005.310 ************************