1 INFO-VAX	Sat, 28 May 2005	Volume 2005 : Issue 296       Contents: Re: ABC problem with disk ' RE: Computerworld: "Ready for trouble?"  Re: DEFRAG ovms 7.3-2 = HiT Software's Allora certified "CA smart"... and runs on VMS ? Re: HP to help governments with tracking users with NAtional ID ? Re: HP to help governments with tracking users with NAtional ID  Re: MultiHead issue on AS400 Re: MultiHead issue on AS400 Re: MultiHead issue on AS400 Re: MultiHead issue on AS400 Re: SEARCH : AND NOT ?1 Re: [BUGTRAQ] High Risk Vulnerability in LISTSERV   F ----------------------------------------------------------------------  # Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 06:26:20 GMT   From: John Santos <john@egh.com>" Subject: Re: ABC problem with disk* Message-ID: <gaUle.2770$Vm4.1535@trnddc01>   David J Dachtera wrote:  > Joe Sewell wrote:  >  >>David J Dachtera wrote:  >> >>>Joe Sewell wrote: >>> M >>>>>Archive backup client, eh? Haven't heard of that since about 1998 or so. " >>>>>Not recommended then, either. >>>>> M >>>>>Use VMS BACKUP to backup VMS disks, or risk losing your data and/or your 6 >>>>>ability to perform disaster recovery expediently. >>>> >>>>Not an option. >>> K >>>Protecting your company's data by doing proper backups is not an option?  >>>  >>>That's *GOTTA* be a first!  >>A >>Oh, they do "proper backups" to the shared computer resources.   >  > B > If it's not VMS BACKUP, it's not "proper" (or "supported"). Your > company's data is at risk. > I > ...but don't take my word for it. contact your OpenVSM support channels ( > and solicit their "official" position. >  >  >>The F >>Alpha workstations used for development purposes, however, aren't asF >>important, it seems; the standard is what we find in the labs, whereE >>the system disk is routinely INITIALIZEd for a VMS upgrade.  (We're D >>talking about hundreds of machines, and nobody has the time to run* >>through the standard upgrade procedure.) >  > C > The install and upgrade both take the same amount of time (unless / > someone is judging by an out-dated standard).  >  > < >>>>This was installed by the system administrator (not me).H >>>>The only reason I even noticed its existence on my machine is due toK >>>>some system slowdown that I tracked down to this thing chewing up about  >>>>5% CPU time in kernel mode.  >>> C >>>...and the reason management continues to tolerate this is ... ?  >>H >>... because "management" doesn't know about it.  This is all under the? >>auspices of IT, which is under a separate sector, which makes . >>accountability more than a little difficult. >>G >>But enough of this.  ABC is what we're stuck with for now.  Help, not G >>criticism of policies that are out of my hands, would be appreciated.  >  > 2 > Your data is at risk. Period - end of statement. > J > If this ABC thing is malfunctioning, it hardly qualifies as either safe,C > proper or supported (by OpenVMS Engineering). If the vendor can't E > support it either, well, does the word "pray" mean anything to you?   C "Not Supported" and "Not supported by HP" are two entirely distinct C concepts.  Everyone is always complaining about lack of third party F software on VMS, and here you are saying "if it's not VMS Engineering, it's gotta go!"     = There are several different things called "ABC".  The one I'm  familiar with is   $ abc 9 Archive Backup Client for ADSM on OpenVMS, Version V1.2-9 8 Copyright 1996-2000, Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc.  A This is the VMS client for Tivoli Storage Manager (formerly IBM's . ADSTAR Distributed Storage Manager, aka ADSM.)  = We use it at one customer site (mandated by their IT people). B Seems to work okay, given that we are pumping all the data through> a 10Mb VAX ethernet connection (half-duplex.)  Performance was; sporadicly variable for a long time, but then they did some < tuning on the server side and since then things have been as# fast as we could reasonably expect.   = It's an ancient version, but they are running VMS 7.1 ... ;-)   5 (Due to migrate to an Alpha cluster in a few months.)   = They have a shadowed system disk, but if they ever need to do < a disaster recovery, they'll have to build a new temp systemB disk, minimally with VMS, TCP/IP and ADSM, recover the system disk? backup to the new real system disk, and then restore everything G else.  (They make the ABC equivalent of "BACKUP/IMAGE/IGNORE=INTERLOCK" C every few days at least, and we can manually fix anything that gets C dinged (queue manager files seem most likely, users don't get added C that often, so we can go back a few versions of SYSUAF, etc. if the 5 latest backup has a bad one.)  Not ideal, but doable.   F Our app is careful about backups and snapshots things with appropriate> context so the application and database backups are all clean.  7 I don't know if any of this is at all useful to the OP.   C BTW, ABC's web site is at www.storserver.com.  Look for "STORServer  Clients" in the menus.     --   John Santos  Evans Griffiths & Hart, Inc. 781-861-0670 ext 539   ------------------------------  % Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 10:58:09 -0400 ' From: "Main, Kerry" <kerry.main@hp.com> 0 Subject: RE: Computerworld: "Ready for trouble?"R Message-ID: <FD827B33AB0D9C4E92EACEEFEE2BA2FB5ED6ED@tayexc19.americas.cpqcorp.net>   > -----Original Message-----9 > From: JF Mezei [mailto:jfmezei.spamnot@teksavvy.com]=20  > Sent: May 26, 2005 8:09 PM > To: Info-VAX@Mvb.Saic.Com 2 > Subject: Re: Computerworld: "Ready for trouble?" >=20 > Tom Linden wrote:  > =20 8 > > I am familiar with how it works,  but in practice=20 > restarting on another F > > cpu from the last checkpoint isn't terribly different from cluster
 > > failover, B > > of course, likely the program would have to be restarted as=20 > opposed to
 > > takingE > > off from last checkpoint, thus introducing an additional latency.  >=20H > The real issue is being able to provide garantee that any transactions  > in progress will not get lost. >=20? > VMS is good at providing at least one host for an incoming=20  > transaction,C > but no so great to handle failure in the middle of a transaction.  >=20? > There are ways around this, such as RTR, and one can write=20  > applications= > that are very cluster aware, and you could conceivably make > > checkpointing between nodes and with lock manager make it=20 > possible for aC > backup node to continue a transaction. But you could do that with ? > Windows too. NSK provides those tools so you don't have to=20  > rewite them. >=20  ? Also, keep in mind that OpenVMS clusters with RTR also ensure a E committed transaction is never lost even if there is a network router  failure.  4 For those interested in more info on RTR, check out:* http://www.hp.com/products1/rtr/index.htmlA http://h18000.www1.hp.com/info/SP5104/SP5104PF.PDF (Jan 2005 SPD)    Regards   
 Kerry Main Senior Consultant  HP Services Canada Voice: 613-592-4660  Fax: 613-591-4477  kerryDOTmainAThpDOTcom (remove the DOT's and AT)=20  4 OpenVMS - the secure, multi-site OS that just works.   ------------------------------  % Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 12:20:07 -0400 - From: William Webb <william.w.webb@gmail.com>  Subject: Re: DEFRAG ovms 7.3-25 Message-ID: <8660a3a1050528092027e2e7@mail.gmail.com>   ? On 5/27/05, David J Dachtera <djesys.nospam@comcast.net> wrote:  > Nigel Barker wrote:  > > L > > On Thu, 26 May 2005 21:05:55 -0500, David J Dachtera <djesys.nospam@com=	 cast.net> 
 > > wrote: > > L > > >Well, before you go doing that, first verify that disk fragmentation i= s H > > >causing a performance problem. Otherwise, you'll be showing them "a% > > >solution looking for a problem".  > > L > > The simplest way to decide whether disk fragmentation is actually causi= ng aL > > performance problem is to do a BACKUP/IMAGE of the disk in question the=	 n restore F > > that backup to the same disk. This will fully defragment the disk. >=209 > How does this help him analyze his present performance?  >=20C > He needs to know what he has before he defrags and after, and the D > measured performance of both. Then, and only then, will he know if@ > fragmentation is an issue and worthy of being pursued further. >=20H > The MONITOR utility is helpful for measuring such things as split I/OsE > if he has that problem, as well as window turns, I/O queues and the 2 > like. That's where I would start, if I were him. >=20 > -- > David J Dachtera > dba DJE Systems  > http://www.djesys.com/ >=20+ > Unofficial OpenVMS Hobbyist Support Page: $ > http://www.djesys.com/vms/support/ >=20* > Unofficial Affordable OpenVMS Home Page:! > http://www.djesys.com/vms/soho/  >=20$ > Unofficial OpenVMS-IA32 Home Page:! > http://www.djesys.com/vms/ia32/  >=20 > Coming soon:( > Unofficial OpenVMS Marketing Home Page >=20  3 I think it should be "her", unless his name is Ann.    WWWebb   --=20 C NOTE: This email address is only used for noncommerical VMS-related  correspondence. C All unsolicited commercial email will be deemed to be a request for 8 services pursuant to the terms and conditions located at# http://bellsouthpwp.net/w/e/webbww/    ------------------------------  % Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 08:24:47 +0200 - From: Didier Morandi <prenom.nom@freesurf.fr> F Subject: HiT Software's Allora certified "CA smart"... and runs on VMS3 Message-ID: <42980eae$0$6564$636a15ce@news.free.fr>   # http://www.ebizq.net/news/5975.html   * HiT Software's Allora Certified 'CA smart'  
 05/27/2005  @ HiT Software, Inc., a developer of standards-based products for H relational database access, announces that its XML integration solution A Allora has been certified CA smart with all Computer Associates  ? International, Inc. (NYSE: CA) enterprise-class DBMS products:  H Advantage CA-Datacom, Advantage CA-IDMS and Ingresr3. The CA smart H seal of excellence is earned by partners who deliver business value and I technical superiority through the integration of their technologies with  
 CA solutions.   8 Allora can be found on CA's ca smart Solution Center at 7 http://ca.com/casmart and on HiT Software's website at   http://www.hitsw.com/casmart.   ; HiT Software provided the following additional information:   @ DBMS solutions from CA provide core production data quality and E integrity with flexible access and deployment for both mainframe and  I open systems relational database management systems. Supported platforms  G include z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE, UNIX, Windows, Linux and OpenVMS. Ingres r3  H is the leading enterprise open source DBMS, supporting mission-critical A applications in small- to medium-size businesses and high-volume  A deployments in large scale enterprises. Advantage CA-Datacom and  E Advantage CA-IDMS are mainframe DBMSs for ultra-high performance and  # extremely large-scale applications.   I Allora's graphical mapping tool, extensive APIs, and run-time middleware  : engine provide the most flexible product on the market to C bi-directionally transform data between XML formats and relational  F database structures. With its powerful and easy-to-use graphical user H interface, Allora offers a fast and convenient way to marshal data from F any relational database to XML, or, even more challenging, to map and ( transform XML data into relational data.  I When combined with CA's DBMS family, Allora offers a unified solution to  I seamlessly integrate any applications or processes via XML. With Allora,  G CA customers have additional options to leverage their DBMS as part of  C their vision of the real-time enterprise and information-on-demand  H systems. Allora is a low-priced, high-performance integration component B that is completely non-intrusive as it can reside anywhere on the < network and requires no installation on the database server.  H "With Allora, integration with CA's DBMS has never been easier and more E cost-effective," said Giacomo Lorenzin, CEO of HiT Software. "The ca  D smart certification of Allora further enables CA customers to share F invaluable data stored in CA's DBMS across the enterprise and achieve F quantum productivity gains. HiT Software is delighted that one of its L key products has achieved ca smart certification for all CA DBMS solutions."  H "To fully leverage their investments in CA databases, our customers are C looking for solutions that make it as easy as possible for them to  G flexibly integrate those databases with any and all of their eBusiness  F systems," said Maurice Donegan , director of product marketing at CA. G "By providing that ease and flexibility, Allora can help our customers  F to unlock the full value of their data and be more competitive in the 
 marketplace."   E For information about Allora and for downloading a fully operational   trial version, go to  @ http://www.hitsw.com/products_services/xml_platform/allora.html.   D. --  1 Didier MORANDI - Expert informaticien - VMS / SAP 0   13 chemin du Gu, 1213 Petit-Lancy (GE) Suisse0 Tl. : +33(0)6 7983 6418 ~ www.didiermorandi.com   ------------------------------  % Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 09:24:12 +0200 & From: Paul Sture <paul.sture@decus.ch>H Subject: Re: HP to help governments with tracking users with NAtional ID+ Message-ID: <3fqkk5F93oboU1@individual.net>    Larry Kilgallen wrote:  V > In article <3fpbqqF8vc5tU1@individual.net>, Paul Sture <paul.sture@decus.ch> writes: >  > I >>DECset I know, but I don't remember LinkWorks (though the SPD contains  ? >>references to such things as TeamWorks, which I do remember).  >  > 0 > So it is the _second_ LinkWorks that you know.   ?    > Which DECset do you know ?  # The one with MMS, CMS, PCA and DTM.    Pray do enlighten us :-)   ------------------------------  % Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 18:28:41 +1000 6 From: "O'Brien Paddy" <Paddy.O'Brien@transgrid.com.au>H Subject: Re: HP to help governments with tracking users with NAtional IDX Message-ID: <8BAD914A0B8CA84C9E94187103A1AB9E05BE31@EX-TG2-PR.corporate.transgrid.local>  , This is a multi-part message in MIME format.  ' ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5635F.41175D7B . Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"+ Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable      -----Original Message-----. >From: Paul Sture [mailto:paul.sture@decus.ch] >Sent: Sat 5/28/2005 5:24 PM >To: Info-VAX@Mvb.Saic.ComI >Subject: Re: HP to help governments with tracking users with NAtional ID  >=20 >Larry Kilgallen wrote:  > L >> In article <3fpbqqF8vc5tU1@individual.net>, Paul Sture <paul.sture@decus= ch> writes:  >>=20  >>=20 J >>>DECset I know, but I don't remember LinkWorks (though the SPD contains=A  >>>references to such things as TeamWorks, which I do remember).  >>=20  >>=20 1 >> So it is the _second_ LinkWorks that you know.  >  >? >  >> Which DECset do you know ?  > $ >The one with MMS, CMS, PCA and DTM.  D And LSE and SCA are part of the product, though these are both free.   >  >Pray do enlighten us :-)   > Even on my Alpha boxes, the licence still calls itself VAXSET.  L If Larry is referring to something else, I would be interested too, but pur=E ely from curiosity, since my working life is spent using this DECset.    Regards, Paddy    G ***********************************************************************   C "This electronic message and any attachments may contain privileged @ and confidential information intended only for the use of the=20D addressees named above.  If you are not the intended recipient of=20C this email, please delete the message and any attachment and advise D the sender.  You are hereby notified that any use, dissemination,=207 distribution, reproduction of this email is prohibited.   C If you have received the email in error, please notify TransGrid=20 C immediately.  Any views expressed in this email are those of the=20 ? individual sender except where the sender expressly and with=20 C authority states them to be the views of TransGrid.  TransGrid uses > virus-scanning software but excludes any liability for viruses contained in any attachment.  < Please note the email address for TransGrid personnel is now$ firstname.lastname@transgrid.com.au"  G ***********************************************************************     ' ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5635F.41175D7B - Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" + Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable   1 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">  <HTML> <HEAD>L <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-= 1"> K <META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7226.0"> L <TITLE>Re: HP to help governments with tracking users with NAtional ID</TIT= LE>  </HEAD>  <BODY>) <!-- Converted from text/plain format -->  <BR>  0 <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR>L &gt;From: Paul Sture [<A HREF=3D"mailto:paul.sture@decus.ch">mailto:paul.st= ure@decus.ch</A>]<BR> # &gt;Sent: Sat 5/28/2005 5:24 PM<BR> ! &gt;To: Info-VAX@Mvb.Saic.Com<BR> L &gt;Subject: Re: HP to help governments with tracking users with NAtional I= D<BR>  &gt;<BR> &gt;Larry Kilgallen wrote:<BR> &gt;<BR>L &gt;&gt; In article &lt;3fpbqqF8vc5tU1@individual.net&gt;, Paul Sture &lt;p=" aul.sture@decus.ch&gt; writes:<BR> &gt;&gt;<BR> &gt;&gt;<BR>L &gt;&gt;&gt;DECset I know, but I don't remember LinkWorks (though the SPD c= ontains<BR> L &gt;&gt;&gt;references to such things as TeamWorks, which I do remember).<B= R> &gt;&gt;<BR> &gt;&gt;<BR>; &gt;&gt; So it is the _second_ LinkWorks that you know.<BR>  &gt;<BR>	 &gt;?<BR>  &gt;<BR>' &gt;&gt; Which DECset do you know ?<BR>  &gt;<BR>+ &gt;The one with MMS, CMS, PCA and DTM.<BR>  <BR>H And LSE and SCA are part of the product, though these are both free.<BR> <BR> &gt;<BR>  &gt;Pray do enlighten us :-)<BR> <BR>B Even on my Alpha boxes, the licence still calls itself VAXSET.<BR> <BR>L If Larry is referring to something else, I would be interested too, but pur=I ely from curiosity, since my working life is spent using this DECset.<BR>  <BR> Regards, Paddy<BR> </FONT>  </P>   <FONT SIZE=3D3><BR>  <BR>K ***********************************************************************<BR>  <BR>G "This electronic message and any attachments may contain privileged<BR> B and confidential information intended only for the use of the <BR>F addressees named above.  If you are not the intended recipient of <BR>G this email, please delete the message and any attachment and advise<BR> F the sender.  You are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, <BR>; distribution, reproduction of this email is prohibited.<BR>  <BR>E If you have received the email in error, please notify TransGrid <BR> E immediately.  Any views expressed in this email are those of the <BR> A individual sender except where the sender expressly and with <BR> G authority states them to be the views of TransGrid.  TransGrid uses<BR> B virus-scanning software but excludes any liability for viruses<BR>  contained in any attachment.<BR> <BR>@ Please note the email address for TransGrid personnel is now<BR>( firstname.lastname@transgrid.com.au"<BR> <BR>K ***********************************************************************<BR>  </FONT>  </BODY>  </HTML> ) ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5635F.41175D7B--    ------------------------------    Date: 28 May 2005 04:05:52 -0700' From: "Graham" <grahambayley@gmail.com> % Subject: Re: MultiHead issue on AS400 C Message-ID: <1117278352.177445.196640@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>   	 hi Nigel,   E Yes swapped LCD and cards in PCI slots, the problems seems to be slot  related.  A Also like i say did power off and sat at the >>> prompt with same  results, it dosnt look  like a DECW problem does it ????   Cheers   Graham   ------------------------------  # Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 10:53:42 GMT ! From: Nigel Barker <nigel@hp.com> % Subject: Re: MultiHead issue on AS400 8 Message-ID: <icjg915bgtktmfhov5o0i65i74pt8t7tq0@4ax.com>  G On 27 May 2005 15:15:30 -0700, "Graham" <grahambayley@gmail.com> wrote:    >Hi all, > H >I have three AS400's all triple head.  I recently upgraded to LCD's and > F >noticed only on one machine that head 1 of (0,1,2) on machine 1 is atE >a different resolution to the others. Screen 0 @ 1280x1024, Screen 1 " >@ 960x1024, Screen 2 @ 1280x1024. > 7 >We did some checking and the normal files are in order < >DECW$DEVICE_CONFIG_GY.COM and DECW$PRIVATE_SERVER_SETUP.COM > = >The issue seems to be not a DECW issue as on a cold boot the C >res of the screen 1 remains at 960x1024.  I looked at the graphics 0 >cards.  All cards are the same jumper settings. > @ >Anyone any ideas how to get screen 1 to 1280x1024 ... please ?? >  >Graham   O Have you swapped LCD displays round to confirm that it's not a hardware problem  with that particular display?    -- Nigel Barker Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur    ------------------------------  # Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 14:01:54 GMT 0 From: spud_demon@e.thundermaker.net (Spud Demon)% Subject: Re: MultiHead issue on AS400 . Message-ID: <mR_le.12$Zy6.643@news.uswest.net>   "Graham" <grahambayley@gmail.com> writes in article <1117232130.237342.14570@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> dated 27 May 2005 15:15:30 -0700:H >I have three AS400's all triple head.  I recently upgraded to LCD's and > F >noticed only on one machine that head 1 of (0,1,2) on machine 1 is atE >a different resolution to the others. Screen 0 @ 1280x1024, Screen 1 " >@ 960x1024, Screen 2 @ 1280x1024. > 7 >We did some checking and the normal files are in order < >DECW$DEVICE_CONFIG_GY.COM and DECW$PRIVATE_SERVER_SETUP.COM > = >The issue seems to be not a DECW issue as on a cold boot the C >res of the screen 1 remains at 960x1024.  I looked at the graphics 0 >cards.  All cards are the same jumper settings. > @ >Anyone any ideas how to get screen 1 to 1280x1024 ... please ??  J Suggestion for further diagnosis:  Swap card 1 with one of the others, seeK if the anomaly follows the card or stays with the slot.  You could also try > swapping monitors (and VGA cables!), if you haven't already.    C If it's the slot, look for differences in SRM variables, especially G graphics-related.  If it's the card, you say you've already checked the I jumpers, so it might be time to get a new card.  ELSA Gloria's are pretty  reasonable.   . --Spud Demon		spud_demon -at- thundermaker.net   ------------------------------  % Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 17:46:06 +0300   From: Veli Korkko <vtk@netti.fi>% Subject: Re: MultiHead issue on AS400 7 Message-ID: <Cz%le.456$4h6.167@reader1.news.jippii.net>   
 Graham wrote: 	 > Hi all,  > I > I have three AS400's all triple head.  I recently upgraded to LCD's and  > G > noticed only on one machine that head 1 of (0,1,2) on machine 1 is at F > a different resolution to the others. Screen 0 @ 1280x1024, Screen 1# > @ 960x1024, Screen 2 @ 1280x1024.  > 8 > We did some checking and the normal files are in order= > DECW$DEVICE_CONFIG_GY.COM and DECW$PRIVATE_SERVER_SETUP.COM  > > > The issue seems to be not a DECW issue as on a cold boot theD > res of the screen 1 remains at 960x1024.  I looked at the graphics1 > cards.  All cards are the same jumper settings.  > A > Anyone any ideas how to get screen 1 to 1280x1024 ... please ??  >  > Graham >   $ Have you checked what is the setting   	DECW$XSIZE_IN_PIXELS  	DECW$YSIZE_IN_PIXELS   * and most notably tried setting them in say   	DECW$PRIVATE_SERVER_SETUP.COM   like) 	DECW$XSIZE_IN_PIXELS == "1280,1280,1280" ) 	DECW$YSIZE_IN_PIXELS == "1024,1024,1024"    _veli    ------------------------------  # Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 14:10:42 GMT 0 From: spud_demon@e.thundermaker.net (Spud Demon) Subject: Re: SEARCH : AND NOT ? . Message-ID: <CZ_le.13$Zy6.490@news.uswest.net>   JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@teksavvy.com> writes in article <42958ADC.FEDF127@teksavvy.com> dated Thu, 26 May 2005 04:38:27 -0400: >Is there a way to do: > 2 >SEARCH RECIPES.TXT  CAKE,VANILLA /MATCH=AND_NOT ? > J >In other words, I want all records that contain "CAKE" but NOT "VANILLA"  > " >I know I can probably use a pipe   I Just re-checked HELP SEARCH /MATCH, and there are some new values since I D last looked.  EQV (all or none) and its opposite, XOR (just some).    E >(ok: consider a log file where you want to extract all records for a H >certain date/hour, and want to exclude records with a certain text thatF >you don't care to look at becase they are so numerous and normal, but: >wish to focus on any record that may show some anomalies)  * I think the PIPE command is your best bet.  . --Spud Demon		spud_demon -at- thundermaker.net   ------------------------------  % Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 12:11:40 -0500 6 From: "Craig A. Berry" <craigberry@mac.com.spamfooler>: Subject: Re: [BUGTRAQ] High Risk Vulnerability in LISTSERVD Message-ID: <craigberry-CBF783.12114028052005@news.isp.giganews.com>  , In article <42975337$1@news.langstoeger.at>,8  peter@langstoeger.at (Peter 'EPLAN' LANGSTOEGER) wrote:  # > LISTSERV on OpenVMS is mentioned: P > http://www.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/securityfocus/bugtraq/2005-05/0288.html  + There is a more detailed announcement here:   5 http://www.lsoft.com/news/securityadvisory2005-05.asp   ; and it only affects systems with the web interface enabled.    ------------------------------   End of INFO-VAX 2005.296 ************************