1 INFO-VAX	Sat, 05 Aug 2006	Volume 2006 : Issue 433       Contents:1 Authentication for outgoing TCP/IP Services mail?  Re: MX%" send mail on VMS  Re: WASD Problems " Re: XP1000 USB port working in VMS" Re: XP1000 USB port working in VMS  F ----------------------------------------------------------------------  % Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 18:40:30 +0200 / From: Paul Sture <paul.sture.nospam@hispeed.ch> : Subject: Authentication for outgoing TCP/IP Services mail?; Message-ID: <415a8$44d4c9ff$50db5015$27406@news.hispeed.ch>   I Some time ago, my ISP changed their mail system so that I need to supply  F authentication for outgoing mail (Good Move against spamming zombies).  ? In Mac Mail, Thunderbird etc, there are settings for supplying  ! authentication for outgoing mail.   . Does similar exist in TCP/IP Services for VMS?   --    
 Paul Sture  / Q. Where did the names C and C++ come from? D A. They were grades.                                 Jerry Leichter   ------------------------------   Date: 5 Aug 2006 02:55:47 -0700 ) From: "Bob Gezelter" <gezelter@rlgsc.com> " Subject: Re: MX%" send mail on VMSB Message-ID: <1154771747.861526.171650@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>   Chuck Aaron wrote:H > If anyone uses the mx exchange mail vs mx054 or close, can you tell me > why I am unable to send out H > messages based on the following? The command I am entering in my mail,' > send is: mx%"caaron@ceris.purdue.edu" . > and then type in a testing message and send. >  > thanks in advance, > chuck  > = > From:   MX%"Postmaster@baberuth"  "MX Mail Delivery System"  > To:     MX%"aaron@baberuth"  > CC: & > Subj:   Delivery status notification >  > Return-Path: <> 5 > From: MX Mail Delivery System <Postmaster@baberuth>  > To: aaron@baberuth& > Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:54:41 -0400' > Subject: Delivery status notification  > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; > A > boundary="=_Hs2Bbn2/6y.mDBlXBW3'smLM+/nDySBbntRrmYgtHn1.KHj4mQ"  > 8 > --=_Hs2Bbn2/6y.mDBlXBW3'smLM+/nDySBbntRrmYgtHn1.KHj4mQ > Content-Type: text/plain > : > This is a report on the delivery status of your message. > 0 >   Message-ID:  <00A59B5E.6060AA04.11@baberuth> >   Subject:     test  >  >   --Failed delivery to:   >   Address: nmasters@purdue.edu7 >   Status:  action not taken: mailbox name not allowed  > 8 > --=_Hs2Bbn2/6y.mDBlXBW3'smLM+/nDySBbntRrmYgtHn1.KHj4mQ >  > Press RETURN for more... >  > MAIL>    Chuck,  A I commonly see this message when the destination email address is  correct.  A Have you tried manually doing the SMTP dialogue with the intended C target machine? Have you checked what the DNS shows as the A and MX D records for the domain? Have you tried turning on logging for the MX
 SMTP service?   $ - Bob Gezelter, http://www.rlgsc.com   ------------------------------   Date: 5 Aug 2006 07:08:06 -0700 . From: "Dan  Williams" <williams.dan@gmail.com> Subject: Re: WASD ProblemsC Message-ID: <1154786885.972050.258220@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>   A > This data doesn't make much sense.  Mind you I'm building it on  > , >    Compaq C V6.4-008 on OpenVMS Alpha V7.3+ >    Process Software MultiNet V5.1 Rev A-X  >  > and  > , >    Compaq C V6.5-001 on OpenVMS Alpha V8.2> >    HP TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS Alpha Version V5.5 - ECO 1 > G > with which undoubtably would introduce some differences.  The closest H > would be the V7.3 and that indicates the PC is in some inprobable partF > of the logging module which shouldn't be in use in demo mode anyway. > . > 1) Which version of C do you have installed? > /., I > 2) Grab the HTTPD914-AXP.ZIP and do a link-build against that to see if G > it's something in the local build.  Once you've unarchived the object + > module you can short-circuit the build by  >  >    $ SET DEFAULT [SRC.HTTPD] >    $ @BUILD_HTTPD LINK >    $ @[INSTALL]DEMO  > J > 3) If you have the HP SSL product installed try a build against that and > see if the problem remains.   E I have Compaq C V6.5-001. If I don't build it and just link, it works G fine. I get the same error if I build with no SSL.  I don't really need C to re-compile it but it would be nice to know why it's not working.    Thanks Dan    ------------------------------  $ Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 21:17:05 -0400* From: "FredK" <fred.nospam@nospam.dec.com>+ Subject: Re: XP1000 USB port working in VMS , Message-ID: <44d3f191$1@usenet01.boi.hp.com>  L There is no planned support for "overriding" the PS2 KB/Mouse (although thatI may be a side effect of a change I am looking at for the next VMS release @ after V8.3.  I use my DS10 in the manner described all the time.  I What I probably should cobble together is a way to easily allow a user to 7 dump out keystrokes so they can create a mapping table.     A "Craig A. Berry" <craigberry@mac.com.spamfooler> wrote in message : news:craigberry-5C2804.18072604082006@free.teranews.com...' > In article <1154189209.232508@smirk>, 8 >  Alan Frisbie <Usenet02_REMOVE@Flying-Disk.com> wrote: > > > > Forrest Kenney has asked me to announce that some fixes he? > > made for some other USB devices now allows the built-in USB A > > port on the XP1000 to work.   You will need to craft an entry ! > > for it in sys$use_config.dat.  > G > I think you mean sys$user_config.dat.  In any case this is good news, J > though of course it arrived the week after I put an NEC-based card in myG > XP1000.  So now I'll have four ports that I need to find something to  > plug into. >  > A > > In other news, lovers of USB toys will be happy to learn that 3 > > the USB Missile Launcher is now running on VMS.  > H > I would settle for getting my Apple keyboard and mouse working with myH > XP1000 and OpenVMS v8.2.  They are "working" from the point of view ofI > the UCM utility -- they show up as tentative when I plug them in, I add F > them, and they are then listed as permanent devices with the correctI > drivers (KBD0 and MOU0, respectively).  After unplugging and replugging D > them, they are again recognized as permanent devices.  However, noF > amount of typing or mousing around can get a rise out of DECwindows,# > even after restarting DECwindows.  > 4 > Aha, searched further after typing that and found: > K > http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=7806  > 73 > E > where the deep, dark magic to disable the PS/2 devices and hack the I > DECwindows configuration may be found, along with warnings about system G > crashes and the limitation that DECwindows cannot start automatically E > with this configuration.  Do any of the v8.3 changes make this less H > deep, dark, and dangerous, or lift the restriction that DECwindows has > to be started manually?  >  > --  ? > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com  >    ------------------------------  % Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 10:38:36 +0200 2 From: martin@radiogaga.harz.de (Martin Vorlaender)+ Subject: Re: XP1000 USB port working in VMS ; Message-ID: <44d4590c.524144494f47414741@radiogaga.harz.de>    FredK wrote:K > What I probably should cobble together is a way to easily allow a user to 9 > dump out keystrokes so they can create a mapping table.   ' Doesn't xev (in DECW$EXAMPLES) do that?    cu,    Martin --  C                              | Martin Vorlaender  |  OpenVMS rules! 6   Microsoft isn't the Borg:  | work: mv@pdv-systeme.deI   the Borg have proper       |   http://www.pdv-systeme.de/users/martinv/ =   networking.                | home: martin@radiogaga.harz.de    ------------------------------   End of INFO-VAX 2006.433 ************************