1 INFO-VAX	Thu, 26 Oct 2006	Volume 2006 : Issue 588       Contents: Re: ADA link messages  Re: ADA link messages " Re: Alternate file types for RUN ?" Re: Alternate file types for RUN ?" Re: Alternate file types for RUN ?" Re: Alternate file types for RUN ?" Re: Alternate file types for RUN ? Re: ATL Products Tape Library $ Re: CSWS expect header vulnerability$ Re: CSWS expect header vulnerability Re: Item codes in F$GETDVI& Java Applet pulled from VMS Web Server Re: Mylex question Re: Mylex question Re: Mylex question Re: NEW Email  address Re: NEW Email  address= Powerhouse developer with OpenVMS for contract in SF Bay Area + Terminal Server Manager and Decnet Phase IV / Re: Terminal Server Manager and Decnet Phase IV / Re: Terminal Server Manager and Decnet Phase IV K Two node ES80 cluster to EVA5000, RWSCS and high CR_WAITS on VMS$VAXcluster > Re: VMS causing access violation when RTERMing to RSTS machine  F ----------------------------------------------------------------------    Date: 25 Oct 2006 15:53:25 -0500- From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)  Subject: Re: ADA link messages3 Message-ID: <4eK$0AuPuHeb@eisner.encompasserve.org>    In article <OF101904AB.12F016BC-ON07257212.005EAFA6-07257212.005F7DF4@mck.us.ray.com>, David D Miller <ddmiller@raytheon.com> writes:  > Larry: > ) > Here is a summary of what I discovered:  > ! > $ACS LOAD ! a bunch of .A files  > $ACS COMPILE P_TRAJBB : > $ACS EXPORT P_TRAJBB /OBJ=[some.other.directory]P_TRAJBB; > $F90 TRAJBB.FOR  ! an interface according to the comments 2 > $LINK ! many .OBJs including P_TRAJBB and TRAJBB > I > That LINK produced the error messages below.  The module name should be  > P_TRAJBB.OBJ.   @ The messages below have potentially crucial information removed.  8 > Does this give you a clue about what may be happening?  A I do not think this problem can be solved by electronic messages. @ If you are unable to resolve it with full access to the machine,> you will need to get someone else to look at it, as painful as# that might be with clearances, etc.   I >> > > %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$IO_EXCEPTIONS_$0000 multiple defined in 	 >> module 	 >> > > .. J >> > > %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$TEXT_IO_$0000 multiple defined in module >> .. I >> > > %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$TEXT_IO$0000 multiple defined in module  > ..K >> > > %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$INTEGER_TEXT_IO_$0000 multiple defined in 	 >> module 	 >> > > .. I >> > > %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$FLOAT_TEXT_IO_$0000 multiple defined in 	 >> module 	 >> > > .. K >> > > %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$MATH_LIB_$0000 multiple defined in module  >> .. J >> > > %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$MATH_LIB$0000 multiple defined in module > ..J >> > > %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$FLOAT_MATH_LIB_$0000 multiple defined in	 >> module  --  N ==============================================================================0 DoD Instruction 8500.2 field test sites wanted -- 	http://www.LJK.com/LJK/8500_2_fieldtest.html N ==============================================================================   ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:47:14 -0700 , From: David D Miller <ddmiller@Raytheon.com> Subject: Re: ADA link messagesV Message-ID: <OFD0153919.9FCCB10E-ON07257212.0076B338-07257212.0077A011@mck.us.ray.com>   Larry:  ' My bad.  Here are the complete messages   9 %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$TEXT_IO_$0000 multiply defined <    in module TEXT_IO file DKB2:[mumble.mumble]P_TRAJBB.OBJ;49 %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$TEXT_IO_$0001 multiply defined <    in module TEXT_IO file DKB2:[mumble.mumble]P_TRAJBB.OBJ;49 %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$TEXT_IO_$0002 multiply defined <    in module TEXT_IO file DKB2:[mumble.mumble]P_TRAJBB.OBJ;49 %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$TEXT_IO_$0003 multiply defined <    in module TEXT_IO file DKB2:[mumble.mumble]P_TRAJBB.OBJ;49 %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$TEXT_IO_$0004 multiply defined <    in module TEXT_IO file DKB2:[mumble.mumble]P_TRAJBB.OBJ;49 %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$TEXT_IO_$0005 multiply defined <    in module TEXT_IO file DKB2:[mumble.mumble]P_TRAJBB.OBJ;46 %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$TEXT_IO_$E multiply defined<    in module TEXT_IO file DKB2:[mumble.mumble]P_TRAJBB.OBJ;48 %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$TEXT_IO$0000 multiply defined<    in module TEXT_IO file DKB2:[mumble.mumble]P_TRAJBB.OBJ;48 %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$TEXT_IO$0001 multiply defined<    in module TEXT_IO file DKB2:[mumble.mumble]P_TRAJBB.OBJ;48 %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$TEXT_IO$0002 multiply defined<    in module TEXT_IO file DKB2:[mumble.mumble]P_TRAJBB.OBJ;48 %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$TEXT_IO$0003 multiply defined<    in module TEXT_IO file DKB2:[mumble.mumble]P_TRAJBB.OBJ;48 %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$TEXT_IO$0004 multiply defined<    in module TEXT_IO file DKB2:[mumble.mumble]P_TRAJBB.OBJ;48 %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$TEXT_IO$0005 multiply defined<    in module TEXT_IO file DKB2:[mumble.mumble]P_TRAJBB.OBJ;45 %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$TEXT_IO$E multiply defined <    in module TEXT_IO file DKB2:[mumble.mumble]P_TRAJBB.OBJ;4   To save bandwidth, substitute 1                 "TEXT_IO" with "INTEGER_TEXT_IO", /                           with "FLOAT_TEXT_IO", -                           with "MATH_LIB, and .                           with "FLOAT_MATH_LIB   to get the full impact   dave.   H Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) wrote on 10/25/2006 01:53:25 PM:  ? > In article <OF101904AB.12F016BC-ON07257212.005EAFA6-07257212. J > 005F7DF4@mck.us.ray.com>, David D Miller <ddmiller@raytheon.com> writes:
 > > Larry: > > + > > Here is a summary of what I discovered:  > > # > > $ACS LOAD ! a bunch of .A files  > > $ACS COMPILE P_TRAJBB < > > $ACS EXPORT P_TRAJBB /OBJ=[some.other.directory]P_TRAJBB= > > $F90 TRAJBB.FOR  ! an interface according to the comments 4 > > $LINK ! many .OBJs including P_TRAJBB and TRAJBB > > K > > That LINK produced the error messages below.  The module name should be  > > P_TRAJBB.OBJ.  > B > The messages below have potentially crucial information removed. > : > > Does this give you a clue about what may be happening? > C > I do not think this problem can be solved by electronic messages. B > If you are unable to resolve it with full access to the machine,@ > you will need to get someone else to look at it, as painful as% > that might be with clearances, etc.  > K > >> > > %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$IO_EXCEPTIONS_$0000 multiple defined in  > >> module  > >> > > .. E > >> > > %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$TEXT_IO_$0000 multiple defined in  module > >> .. K > >> > > %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$TEXT_IO$0000 multiple defined in module  > > ..J > >> > > %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$INTEGER_TEXT_IO_$0000 multiple defined in > >> module  > >> > > .. K > >> > > %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$FLOAT_TEXT_IO_$0000 multiple defined in  > >> module  > >> > > .. F > >> > > %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$MATH_LIB_$0000 multiple defined in module > >> .. E > >> > > %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$MATH_LIB$0000 multiple defined in  module > > ..I > >> > > %LINK-W-MULDEF, symbol ADA$FLOAT_MATH_LIB_$0000 multiple defined  in > >> module  > -- > N ==============================================================================  2 > DoD Instruction 8500.2 field test sites wanted -1 >    http://www.LJK.com/LJK/8500_2_fieldtest.html  > N ==============================================================================   ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:53:55 -0400 - From: JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@teksavvy.com> + Subject: Re: Alternate file types for RUN ? , Message-ID: <453FDCEF.A2E10ADE@teksavvy.com>   etmsreec@yahoo.co.uk wrote: I > Higher levels of HP management may be selective in what they listen to. 8 >  Engineering in VMS, on the other hand, always listen.  F Yes they listen, and we have very good experiences here on c.o.v. thatG they do listen and ofte take the time to explain the reasons for having " gone one way instead of the other.  D However, while they listen, they most often add "but unless you  canG convince our management with $$$ that such a change is needed, it isn't $ going to get done" type of response.  F There have been big exceptions. I think Guy Peleg was probably a rogue@ engineer living far far away and just edited files and added newH features as requested by users and not bother with asking VMS management for permisstion. :-)   ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:33:28 -0400 6 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Arne_Vajh=F8j?= <arne@vajhoej.dk>+ Subject: Re: Alternate file types for RUN ? 7 Message-ID: <4540024e$0$49208$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>    Dave Froble wrote: > Arne Vajhj wrote:: >> Static linking is a concept practically unknown on VMS. > ' > I agree with you up until this point.  > K > I have many applications that link against OLB libraries.  The code from  K > the library gets copied into the executable.  My build procedures rarely  A > link against OBJ files.  Much better to have them in a library.   ( You are right. What I wrote is not true.   I was thinking about /NOSYSSHR.   A Static linking with VMS & compiler RTL's is very uncommon on VMS.    Arne   ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:25:55 -0400 - From: JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@teksavvy.com> + Subject: Re: Alternate file types for RUN ? , Message-ID: <45400E91.43196F91@teksavvy.com>   Arne Vajhj wrote:C > Static linking with VMS & compiler RTL's is very uncommon on VMS.   H But even if you link against a shareable library,  your executable has aE hard link to that library. (yes, i know, you can bypass the hard link H and use logicals, but the image still expects to load the same shareable@ image as was used when it was linked (because offsets within theF shareable image to entry points of each routine are hard coded in your image once it has been linked.  F This is quite different from lib$find_image_symbol where not only doesF the image specify the name of the shareable image at run time, it also3 resolves symbol offsets into that file at run time.    ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 22:05:06 -0400 6 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Arne_Vajh=F8j?= <arne@vajhoej.dk>+ Subject: Re: Alternate file types for RUN ? 7 Message-ID: <454017c8$0$49196$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>    JF Mezei wrote:  > Arne Vajhj wrote:D >> Static linking with VMS & compiler RTL's is very uncommon on VMS. > J > But even if you link against a shareable library,  your executable has aG > hard link to that library. (yes, i know, you can bypass the hard link J > and use logicals, but the image still expects to load the same shareableB > image as was used when it was linked (because offsets within theH > shareable image to entry points of each routine are hard coded in your  > image once it has been linked. > H > This is quite different from lib$find_image_symbol where not only doesH > the image specify the name of the shareable image at run time, it also5 > resolves symbol offsets into that file at run time.    I can not see that difference.  ? Whether it is the image activator or LIB$FIND_IMAGE_SYMBOL that ? calls SYS$IMGACT and SYS$IMGFIX should not be a big difference.    Arne   ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 23:16:47 -0400 - From: JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@teksavvy.com> + Subject: Re: Alternate file types for RUN ? , Message-ID: <45402886.80012E37@teksavvy.com>   Arne Vajhj wrote:A > Whether it is the image activator or LIB$FIND_IMAGE_SYMBOL that A > calls SYS$IMGACT and SYS$IMGFIX should not be a big difference.    Makes a big difference.   F Shareable images are resolved at link time. Both the file name as wellH as the linker finding the offset within the shareable image of the entry& point for the routine you are calling.  G LIB$FIND_IMAGE_SYMBOL does nothing at link time. It is all very dynamic  at run time.   Consider this:  % You have a directory with "plug-ins".   F With traditional shareable images, your application would have a fixed' list of plug uins defined at link time.   E With LIB$FIND_IMAGE_SYMBOL, your application can dynamically scan the C directory at run time to draw a list of available plug-ins and then E access the plug-in you want. Not only this, but each plug-in can have E the same routine names/entry points. Your app can then mamage them in ? separate structures/variables. This is not possible with normal A shareable images because the linker would complain about multiple ; shareable images having the same entry points/symbol names.   G Consider an image editing program where you have "plugins" to allow you @ to save to different formats.  Each plug-in would have identicalG interface (entry point name and arguments) so that the main program can ) call any plug-in with the same arguments.    ------------------------------   Date: 25 Oct 2006 19:14:31 GMT From: healyzh@aracnet.com & Subject: Re: ATL Products Tape Library, Message-ID: <ehod2n01dib@enews4.newsguy.com>  ' Jim Mehlhop <mjim1025@qwest.net> wrote: 2 > Thanks Ian.  Too bad, because I found one cheap!   > Jim   F Before you even think about getting something like this, I'd recommendG finding out if you can get support on it.  They are great "little" tape E libraries that are well built, but as with any tape library there is  # plenty that can go wrong with them.    		Zane   ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:46:26 -0400 - From: JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@teksavvy.com> - Subject: Re: CSWS expect header vulnerability + Message-ID: <453FDB31.B2D87B9@teksavvy.com>    Ok, question here:  F Whats does the "Expect:" header do ? Is this a server issued header asE part of the HTTP response, or is it a client issued header as part of  the request ?    And who does what with it ?    ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:26:22 -0600 1 From: "john.nebel_vms" <john.nebel_vms@csdco.com> - Subject: Re: CSWS expect header vulnerability ( Message-ID: <453FF29E.2060502@csdco.com>   JF Mezei wrote:    > Ok, question here: > H > Whats does the "Expect:" header do ? Is this a server issued header asG > part of the HTTP response, or is it a client issued header as part of  > the request ?  >  > And who does what with it ?    JF,   G This vuln involves the combination of bad coding in Apache, Flash, and  % IE and a user who is clicking around.   F (1) The browser (the person) is tricked into downloading a flash file ; from the exploiter's site to see an animation or some such.   G (2) The flash executes in the context of the browser (the program) and  E the flash script constructs an expect header munged with an embedded  & javascript and sends it to the server.  E "The Expect request-header field is used to indicate that particular  - server behaviors are required by the client."   @ (3) Apache responds by sending a message back with the embedded 9 javascript which then in turn is executed by the browser.   B (4) ~Potentially~ the javascript pops up a browser window and the F exploiter owns what happens subsequently in that window - here we are G getting beyond the proof of concept - but maybe ones paypa1 or bank ID  ! and password go to the exploiter.   I http://secunia.com/expect_header_cross-site_scripting_vulnerability_test/    Best,    John   ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:29:31 -0700 4 From: Alan Frisbie <Usenet02_REMOVE@Flying-Disk.com># Subject: Re: Item codes in F$GETDVI % Message-ID: <1161811771.812037@smirk>    Galen wrote: > L >>> HS1.90A4Aha!   My error.   The system is still running F8.3.   I thoughtE >> that I had upgraded it to V8.3 but apparently I did not.   I guess A >> this item code was one that got slipped in at the last minute.   D > If I recall, German "v" is pronounced "f". Since you were probably< > aware of this, too, perhaps it tripped you up somehow. :-)  @ This is why FMS is so often confused with VMS?   :-)   :-)   :-)   Alan   ------------------------------  % Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 06:54:07 +0800 3 From: "Richard Maher" <maher_rj@hotspamnotmail.com> / Subject: Java Applet pulled from VMS Web Server 1 Message-ID: <ehopna$g4d$1@news-02.connect.com.au>    Hi,   L Does anyone have an example of the commands involved in creating and storing$ a small Java Applet on a VMS system?  I I want to be able to activate the Applet from a page in a Web Broswer and @ link back to the same (or other) VMS server via a TCP/IP socket.  C Pointers to the "specific" documentation will also be very welcome.   * I have this much to go on at the moment: -    http://java.sun.com/sfaq/#socket  G This from some Java Socket discussion page on what the Applet(s) should 
 contain: -   Creating a client   ; To talk to a server, open a socket to the machine and port:   9 Socket s = new Socket("mastercard.com", 303); // port 303   4 When this returns, you can get input/output streams:  ' OutputStream out = s.getOutputStream(); ( PrintStream pout = new PrintStream(out);$ pout.println("hi from java client");
 pout.close(); 
 s.close();  H The client's input stream is pulling from the server's output stream and vice versa.    Regards Richard Maher    ------------------------------    Date: 25 Oct 2006 10:52:56 -0700; From: "johnhreinhardt@yahoo.com" <johnhreinhardt@yahoo.com>  Subject: Re: Mylex question C Message-ID: <1161798776.862799.240430@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>    Jim Mehlhop wrote: > G > On my home PWS500 that I picked up on Ebay with a KZPAC I did not get D > the RCU for Alpha diskette.  Does anyone know where I can get one? >   E Google this group.  The link for the HP page was given earlier in the  thread.   A Or just Google KZPAC and HP.  You get the link on the first page.   E The first thing to learn when you get a piece of equipment on Ebay...  Google, google, google.    ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 11:55:25 -0600 & From: Jim Mehlhop <Mehlhop@parsec.com> Subject: Re: Mylex question ' Message-ID: <453FA50D.70602@parsec.com>    johnhreinhardt@yahoo.com wrote:    > Jim Mehlhop wrote: > G >>On my home PWS500 that I picked up on Ebay with a KZPAC I did not get D >>the RCU for Alpha diskette.  Does anyone know where I can get one? >> >  > G > Google this group.  The link for the HP page was given earlier in the 	 > thread.  > C > Or just Google KZPAC and HP.  You get the link on the first page.  > G > The first thing to learn when you get a piece of equipment on Ebay...  > Google, google, google.  >   H Thanks.  Just save the image to diskette then I assume and the bring up  the SRM and run it.   ! Will try it when I have a chance.    Jim    ------------------------------    Date: 25 Oct 2006 12:12:05 -0700; From: "johnhreinhardt@yahoo.com" <johnhreinhardt@yahoo.com>  Subject: Re: Mylex question C Message-ID: <1161803525.208778.195010@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>    Jim Mehlhop wrote:! > johnhreinhardt@yahoo.com wrote:  >  > > Jim Mehlhop wrote: > > I > >>On my home PWS500 that I picked up on Ebay with a KZPAC I did not get F > >>the RCU for Alpha diskette.  Does anyone know where I can get one? > >> > >  > > I > > Google this group.  The link for the HP page was given earlier in the  > > thread.  > > E > > Or just Google KZPAC and HP.  You get the link on the first page.  > > I > > The first thing to learn when you get a piece of equipment on Ebay...  > > Google, google, google.  > >  > I > Thanks.  Just save the image to diskette then I assume and the bring up  > the SRM and run it.  > # > Will try it when I have a chance.  >  > Jim   ? Yes.  The utility runs under ARC (Alphabios) and it needs a FAT  formatted floppy.   G Make sure you download the Users Guide and the the firmware utilty.  If 7 your's isn't at V2.70 then you will want to upgrade it.    ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:32:29 -0600 & From: Jim Mehlhop <Mehlhop@parsec.com> Subject: Re: NEW Email  address ) Message-ID: <453FADBD.2010206@parsec.com>    david20@alpha2.mdx.ac.uk wrote:   X > In article <op.thzkplj9tte90l@hyrrokkin>, "Tom Linden" <tom@kednos-remove.com> writes: > D >>On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 09:05:08 -0700, Island Computers, D B Turner    >><dbturner@islandco.com> wrote: >> >>L >>>Well, now I am getting over 2000 spam messages a day ( I am truly sick of >>>it), I am getting rid of  >>> < >>>dbturner@islandco.com and going to change to just dturner >>>  >>> ) >>>Please ammend your records accordingly  >>> 4 >>>This will be effective beginning of next week !!! >>>  >>>  >>>  >>M >>Install MX on your VMS box and write a few filters, you should be able to    >>keep it to no # >>more than 10 - 20 per  day, I do.  >> > P > As I recall islandco.com no longer uses a VMS mailserver they moved to using a > WIN2K box. >  > David Webb > Security team leader > CCSS > Middlesex University >  >  >  >>--  G >>Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/   I Precise Mail  from Process Software can run as a proxy pass through SMTP  C server and runs on all sorts of OS's  OF COURSE I run mine on VMS!!    ------------------------------  + Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:03:51 +0000 (UTC) P From: helbig@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de (Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply) Subject: Re: NEW Email  address $ Message-ID: <ehocem$pr9$1@online.de>  G In article <12jv2pkg73ggbee@news.supernews.com>, "Island Computers, D B ( Turner" <dbturner@islandco.com> writes:   K > Well, now I am getting over 2000 spam messages a day ( I am truly sick of  > it), I am getting rid of > ; > dbturner@islandco.com and going to change to just dturner   F My experience is: this won't help.  Gone are the days when an address G was vulnerable to spam only if it could be publicly harvested, usually  E from a newsgroup or web page.  Now, much (most?) spam comes from two  F sources: viruses which infect PCs, read the address books or whatever D and spam from there (to avoid this, you would have to get people on B vulnerable (i.e. Windows) computers to avoid storing your address G electronically) and dictionary attacks (also often from virus-infected  G PCs: just go through all combinations of letters and eventually you'll  H get a valid username).  What might help here is a LONGER username, such F as theoneandonlygreatvmsfriendlycomputerdealermrdbturnerhimselfindeed.  G On the subject of long usernames: has HP TCPIP been upgraded yet to be  H able to reject mail to non-valid usernames even if they are longer than  12 characters?   ------------------------------    Date: 25 Oct 2006 14:25:02 -0700' From: "pyramid36" <pyramid36@gmail.com> F Subject: Powerhouse developer with OpenVMS for contract in SF Bay AreaB Message-ID: <1161811502.443977.188210@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>  A We need a Consultant with experience migrating and implementing a F content management solution.  Experience with Microsoft CMS is helpfulF but not required.  If interested, give me a call at (800) 903-8359 and; email your resume.  Details on the position can be found at " www.cotterkimbrough.com/opps.htm .  
 Ken Kimbrough " Cotter Kimbrough Associates, Inc. 
 Marietta, GA   (770) 578-4493   ------------------------------  # Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 00:26:20 GMT & From: "Hal Kuff" <HalKuff@Verizon.Net>4 Subject: Terminal Server Manager and Decnet Phase IV, Message-ID: <MgT%g.81223$073.75255@trnddc01>  L Does TSM work with Phase IV..? Seems to reference NCL... What version would  that be..?     ------------------------------  % Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:35:24 -0400 3 From: "Richard B. Gilbert" <rgilbert88@comcast.net> 8 Subject: Re: Terminal Server Manager and Decnet Phase IV: Message-ID: <Mf6dnS9fBN_4jd3YnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@comcast.com>   Hal Kuff wrote:   N > Does TSM work with Phase IV..? Seems to reference NCL... What version would 
 > that be..?   >  >   D TSM used to work with Phase IV.  I haven't had TSM for a long time, I maybe ten years so I'm talking about pretty old versions of both TSM and   VMS.   ------------------------------    Date: 25 Oct 2006 19:12:15 -0700) From: "Bob Gezelter" <gezelter@rlgsc.com> 8 Subject: Re: Terminal Server Manager and Decnet Phase IVB Message-ID: <1161828735.251665.242760@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>   Hal Kuff wrote: M > Does TSM work with Phase IV..? Seems to reference NCL... What version would  > that be..?   Hal,  < I concur with Richard. Terminal Server Manager (for managingD DECservers, correct) predates Phase V DECnet by a VERY large margin.  $ - Bob Gezelter, http://www.rlgsc.com   ------------------------------    Date: 25 Oct 2006 16:20:10 -0700) From: "quick6_98" <quick6_98@hotmail.com> T Subject: Two node ES80 cluster to EVA5000, RWSCS and high CR_WAITS on VMS$VAXclusterC Message-ID: <1161818410.246972.305390@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>    Hello,  D We have recently started seeing processes in RWSCS and high CR_WAITSF (860) on the cluster.  The first clue came from AMDS complaining.  TheE primary node is running a database application and the second node is E used for interactive logins accessing the same database. Here is some ) output from $ANALYZE/SYSTEM LCK STAT/ALL:    NODE A:   2 Total Locks . . . . . . . . . . . . :       3084802       Local Copy Locks  . . . . . . :        745732       Process Copy Locks  . . . . . :       1722972       Master Copy Locks . . . . . . :        614142       Cached Locks  . . . . . . . . :          196  2 Total Resources . . . . . . . . . . :       1532562       Locally Mastered  . . . . . . :        627112 Total Root Resources  . . . . . . . :         92582       Locally Mastered  . . . . . . :         29372 Total Cached Resources  . . . . . . :          246  2 Size of Resource Hash Table . . . . :      11000002 Used Entries  . . . . . . . . . . . :       1435065 Usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :           13.0% 5 Average Chain Length  . . . . . . . :            1.07 2 Maximum Chain Length  . . . . . . . :            4   NODE B: 2 Total Locks . . . . . . . . . . . . :       3910912       Local Copy Locks  . . . . . . :       1571312       Process Copy Locks  . . . . . :        614182       Master Copy Locks . . . . . . :       1719412       Cached Locks  . . . . . . . . :          601  2 Total Resources . . . . . . . . . . :       1961312       Locally Mastered  . . . . . . :       1615072 Total Root Resources  . . . . . . . :         99062       Locally Mastered  . . . . . . :         69362 Total Cached Resources  . . . . . . :          455  2 Size of Resource Hash Table . . . . :       5880002 Used Entries  . . . . . . . . . . . :       1671985 Usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :           28.4% 5 Average Chain Length  . . . . . . . :            1.17 2 Maximum Chain Length  . . . . . . . :            5E There are no complaints from AMDS as far as lock contention but users = are complaing of "stalls".  The problem seemed to start after F installing VMS_UPDATE_0800 and a reboot of both nodes.  Any help would be appreciated.    thank, phil   ------------------------------   Date: 25 Oct 2006 19:28:13 GMT From: healyzh@aracnet.com G Subject: Re: VMS causing access violation when RTERMing to RSTS machine , Message-ID: <ehodsd11dib@enews4.newsguy.com>  < In comp.os.vms Julian Wolfe <fireflyst@earthlink.net> wrote:H > Has anyone seen this before?  The following is happening when I try toA > connect to my RSTS/E machine via RTERM.  Any help would be much  > appreciated.  E Refresh my memory, cterm won't work, but rterm will when using modern J versions of VMS to talk to RSTS/E?  I can see you're running OpenVMS/Alpha* 8.3, what versions of RSTS/E and DECnet/E?  @ I've used OpenVMS/Alpha 7.3-2 running DECnet-Plus, and DECnet IVG to talk to RSTS/E 10.1 with DECnet/E 4.1, I don't have a system running * OpenVMS/Alpha 8.3 yet, so can't test that.  K At this point, the best advice I can offer is to ensure that you don't have F any marginal piece in the network that connects the two systems.  ThisH caused me no end of problems when I initially got DECnet/E running on my system.    		Zane   ------------------------------   End of INFO-VAX 2006.588 ************************