1 INFO-VAX	Fri, 15 Sep 2006	Volume 2006 : Issue 507       Contents:  Re: Alphastation 600 memory type  Re: Alphastation 600 memory type Re: DecServer woes Re: DecServer woes Re: DecServer woes Re: FTP strangeness  Re: FTP strangeness  Re: FTP strangeness & Re: HP announces new Integrity servers HSG80 CACHE UPGRADE questionP Re: Mozilla Thunderbird with VMS (was:Re: VMS MAIL: Will it ever join the 21st cP Re: Mozilla Thunderbird with VMS (was:Re: VMS MAIL: Will it ever join the 21st c Re: MP Synchronization ISSUES ' Netbeans IDE$SERVER connection problems % Question re VMS732_UPDATE-V0800 patch  System won't self-test or boot" Re: System won't self-test or boot" Re: System won't self-test or boot" Re: System won't self-test or boot  F ----------------------------------------------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 20:49:23 +0800  From: prep@prep.synonet.com ) Subject: Re: Alphastation 600 memory type 0 Message-ID: <87u039pa5o.fsf@k9.prep.synonet.com>  * "Rich Jordan" <jordan@ccs4vms.com> writes:  E > Paul assuming a 600-5/333 uses the same memory, it should be 72-pin E > tin contact true parity SIMM memory, 60 or 70ns.  You need to use 8 D > matching SIMMs per bank.  My AS600 has two banks of 16MB SIMMs forF > 256MB total memory.  I _believe_ they could accept 32MB SIMMs and so6 > get up to 1GB of memory if all banks were populated.   Fast Page rather than EDO?  B I have two of them, both with a single lonley SIMM sitting in each& socket set. Interesting looking box...   --  < Paul Repacholi                               1 Crescent Rd.,7 +61 (08) 9257-1001                           Kalamunda. @                                              West Australia 6076* comp.os.vms,- The Older, Grumpier Slashdot. Raw, Cooked or Well-done, it's all half baked.F EPIC, The Architecture of the future, always has been, always will be.   ------------------------------    Date: 15 Sep 2006 09:21:19 -0700( From: "Rich Jordan" <jordan@ccs4vms.com>) Subject: Re: Alphastation 600 memory type A Message-ID: <1158337279.063711.14720@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>    prep@prep.synonet.com wrote:, > "Rich Jordan" <jordan@ccs4vms.com> writes: > G > > Paul assuming a 600-5/333 uses the same memory, it should be 72-pin G > > tin contact true parity SIMM memory, 60 or 70ns.  You need to use 8 F > > matching SIMMs per bank.  My AS600 has two banks of 16MB SIMMs forH > > 256MB total memory.  I _believe_ they could accept 32MB SIMMs and so8 > > get up to 1GB of memory if all banks were populated. >  > Fast Page rather than EDO? > D > I have two of them, both with a single lonley SIMM sitting in each( > socket set. Interesting looking box... >  > --> > Paul Repacholi                               1 Crescent Rd.,9 > +61 (08) 9257-1001                           Kalamunda. B >                                              West Australia 6076, > comp.os.vms,- The Older, Grumpier Slashdot0 > Raw, Cooked or Well-done, it's all half baked.H > EPIC, The Architecture of the future, always has been, always will be.  G Fast page sounds right too.  I think I tried EDO memory in mine with no ? luck.  I know that the SIMMs I ended up using also worked in my C Alphastation 200, which is a 60-70ns fast page mode true parity tin  contact box.  E A couple of vendors had sales on the 16MB SIMMs last year that worked A but by then I was no longer spending money on the AS600 (its been G replaced by a DS10-L).  Unfortunately the gold contact SIMMs seem to be  much more prevalent these days.   C The banking order of the memory in AS600 boxes is interesting.  Two A memory boards, with 4 SIMM slots on each board per bank.  4 banks B total.  A system with only one bank of memory looks quite sparselyD populated since the SIMMs in a given bank are scattered all over the board.  D I had no complaints with my AS600 other than power usage and heat...D well, and size.  One thing to watch out for; the cable that connects> the front control panel to the main logic board runs along theE removeable side panel.  Pinch the cable, it can short out and do ugly F smoky smelly things to the system, control panel, and MLB.  It took meD a while to get mine running again (fortunatley the MLB survived, and= the control panel still worked althought the display lost its * illumination and some of its matrix dots).   ------------------------------    Date: 14 Sep 2006 23:30:48 -0700/ From: "Volker Halle" <volker_halle@hotmail.com>  Subject: Re: DecServer woes B Message-ID: <1158301848.120994.220610@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>   Glen,   G connect a terminal/laptop to port 1 of the DS700 and cycle power on the D DECserver. You'll see the DECserver messages on that (console) port.' Troubleshoot based on that information.    Volker.    ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 06:41:23 -0400 / From: "William Webb" <william.w.webb@gmail.com>  Subject: Re: DecServer woes I Message-ID: <8660a3a10609150341g6b449477y6e74e889750b2541@mail.gmail.com>   ; On 9/14/06, Glen Thompson <glen.thompson@cox.netnet> wrote: G > I had a DecServer 700 that had a memory SIMM go bad.  After replacing H > the SIMM I'm unable to load the software into it.   Grabbed a spare DSG > and configured it and it won't accept the software load either.  Both I > DecServers show normal startup with the proper amount of memory (5 MB).  >  > Specifics: > & > OpenVMS 7.2 on a Vaxstation 4000-90a" > DecServer 700-16, firmware 3.4-9 > J > Normal procedure is to run MCR LANCP and issue a TRIGGER command to sendF > the software to the DS.  This time it doesn't seem to work. Here areH > some of the details.  DS700A is working fine.  DS700B won't load.  MAC< > addresses have been verified.    Any ideas on what to try? >  > TIA, > glen >  >  >  > LANCP> show config >  > LAN Configuration:7 >    Device   Medium      Default LAN Address   Version 7 >    ------   ------      -------------------   ------- = >     EZA0    CSMA/CD      08-00-2B-30-A2-BC    Not available  > LANCP> > : > ======================================================== >  > LANCP> sho node  > " > Node Listing, volatile database: >  > (Catchall entry):  >  > DS700A (08-00-2B-3B-10-E1): D >   MOP DLL:  Load file:   DKA0:[SYS0.SYSCOMMON.DECSERVER]WWENG2.SYS+ >             Load root:   (None specified)   >             Boot type:   Other >  > DS700B (08-00-2B-2C-A0-B5): D >   MOP DLL:  Load file:   DKA0:[SYS0.SYSCOMMON.DECSERVER]WWENG2.SYS+ >             Load root:   (None specified)   >             Boot type:   Other > E > ===================================================================  >  > LANCP> sho log > * > SYS$MANAGER:LAN$ACP.LOG latest contents: > ) >     Requested file:  LAN$DLL:WWENG1.SYS I >  1-SEP-2006 16:11:37.13  Could not respond to load request on EZA0 from  > DS700A, file not foundJ >  1-SEP-2006 16:15:06.66  Volunteered to load request on EZA0 from DS700A@ >     Requested file:  DKA0:[SYS0.SYSCOMMON.DECSERVER]WWENG2.SYS< >  1-SEP-2006 16:15:31.86  Load succeeded for DS700A on EZA0" >     MOP V4 format, System image,+ > DKA0:[SYS0.SYSCOMMON.DECSERVER]WWENG2.SYS ( >     Packets:  6819 sent, 6819 received< >     Bytes:    1717931 sent, 20457 received, 1677017 loaded4 >     Elapsed time:  00:00:25.07, 66893 bytes/second= > 14-SEP-2006 13:56:15.50  Cleared MOP downline load counters  > : > ======================================================== > & > LANCP> trigger node ds700b /dev=eza0' > Triggering 08-00-2B-2C-A0-B5 via EZA0 5 > %LANCP-I-MOPV4BOOT, MOP Version 4 boot message sent 5 > -LANCP-I-MOPV3BOOT, MOP Version 3 boot message sent  >  >  >  > * Nobody's mentioned the lights on the back.  P Does it get all the way to the "crazy eight", or does it hang on something else?   WWWebb   --   VMS Systems  Quest Diagnostics = first.x.last@f$edit(contents of previous line,"COMPRESS").com    ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 08:19:52 -0400 0 From: "Glen Thompson" <glen.thompson@cox.netnet> Subject: Re: DecServer woes - Message-ID: <ITwOg.10909$Zm1.9792@dukeread02>   D Goes to 4 (requesting load) and when I issue the TRIGGER command it E seems to restart. It never gets to 3 (load in progress).  This is in  7 another city so I have to do most of this on the phone.   E I did hook up a VT to port 1 and got all normal messages,  I got one  3 "Bad XID" message but that was just one out of 50+.   ; "William Webb" <william.w.webb@gmail.com> wrote in message  C news:8660a3a10609150341g6b449477y6e74e889750b2541@mail.gmail.com... , > Nobody's mentioned the lights on the back. > C > Does it get all the way to the "crazy eight", or does it hang on   > something else?  >  > WWWebb >  >    ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:40:15 +0200 + From: Martin Vorlaender <mv@pdv-systeme.de>  Subject: Re: FTP strangeness+ Message-ID: <4mvanvF813r3U1@individual.net>    Gremlin wrote:N > Problem using SmartFTP uploading directories to to my server, Compaq TCP/IP I > Services for OpenVMS Alpha Version V5.1 on a AlphaServer DS10L 466 MHz   > running OpenVMS V7.2-2. [...] H > Or, is there a nice, *free*, graphical windows-based client I can use?.  > If it ran on XPx64 that would be nice too!!  G I had all positive experience with Filezilla[1] and UCX. Not sure about  the x64 part, though.    HTH,	    Martin   % [1] http://filezilla.sourceforge.net/  --  D One OS to rule them all       | Martin Vorlaender  |  OpenVMS rules!7 One OS to find them           | work: mv@pdv-systeme.de H One OS to bring them all      | http://www.pdv-systeme.de/users/martinv/> And in the Darkness bind them.| home: martin@radiogaga.harz.de   ------------------------------    Date: 15 Sep 2006 03:39:48 -0700, From: "Cluster-Karl" <karl.rohwedder@gmx.de> Subject: Re: FTP strangenessC Message-ID: <1158316788.056323.186190@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>    Here is part of  RFC 959:0  C RFC 959                                                     October  1985 File Transfer Protocol(          550 Requested action not taken.@              File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access).  - Btw. also the HGFTP client sends a 550 error.   
 regards Kalle    ------------------------------    Date: 15 Sep 2006 06:36:25 -0500 From: briggs@encompasserve.org Subject: Re: FTP strangeness3 Message-ID: <m89CtIqg$M7j@eisner.encompasserve.org>   r In article <1158316788.056323.186190@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "Cluster-Karl" <karl.rohwedder@gmx.de> writes: > Here is part of  RFC 959:0 > E > RFC 959                                                     October  > 1985 > File Transfer Protocol* >          550 Requested action not taken.B >              File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access). > / > Btw. also the HGFTP client sends a 550 error.   $ Clients don't send 550's, of course.   ------------------------------    Date: 15 Sep 2006 08:03:49 -0700- From: "Andrew" <andrew_harrison@symantec.com> / Subject: Re: HP announces new Integrity servers C Message-ID: <1158332629.797245.109390@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>    Main, Kerry wrote: > > -----Original Message-----3 > > From: Bill Todd [mailto:billtodd@metrocast.net] % > > Sent: September 13, 2006 10:14 PM  > > To: Info-VAX@Mvb.Saic.Com 3 > > Subject: Re: HP announces new Integrity servers  > >  > > Main, Kerry wrote:! > > >> -----Original Message----- 6 > > >> From: Bill Todd [mailto:billtodd@metrocast.net]' > > >> Sent: September 13, 2006 7:20 PM   > > >> To: Info-VAX@Mvb.Saic.Com6 > > >> Subject: Re: HP announces new Integrity servers > > >> > > >> Main, Kerry wrote: # > > >>>> -----Original Message----- 8 > > >>>> From: Bill Todd [mailto:billtodd@metrocast.net]) > > >>>> Sent: September 11, 2006 2:26 AM " > > >>>> To: Info-VAX@Mvb.Saic.Com8 > > >>>> Subject: Re: HP announces new Integrity servers > > >  > > > [snip ...] > > > ' > > >>> You are looking at the HW only. < > > >> No, idiot:  I'm looking at *solution* costs - initial > > >> purchase, ease ofC > > >> obtaining personnel familiar with the hardware and software, D > > >> availability of applications, cost-reduction by consolidating > > >> around a F > > >> single platform type (which in many cases is possible *only* by= > > >> consolidating around x86, because x86 will *always* be  > > required for) > > >> *some* portions of the operation).  > > >>I > > >> The word 'hardware' appears nowhere above, and the word 'solution' D > > >> appears in each of the two assertions (both in their original > > >> forms and= > > >> in the subsequent paraphrasing of them).  So read them  > > again, and tryI > > >> again, or shut up.  I'm not going to state them a third time here, H > > >> because both the original statement and the later paraphrase were> > > >> crystal clear, despite your incompetent attempt to (yet > > again) divert   > > >> the discussion elsewhere. > > >> > > > = > > > Unfortunately, when you quote solution or support, your  > > previous replies? > > > have been very HW only focussed - as an example from your  > > earlier reply- > > >  > > > Earlier Bill Quote:  > > > @ > > > Exactly:  they are looking at *standardizing* (for reasons > > of cost and = > > > support complexity that have nothing to do with 'techie  > > chip stuff') on < > > > the *least expensive viable solution*.  And beyond any > > shadow of a doubt E > > > that's x86-64 in any situation where that solution *is* viable.  > > > @ > > > That's up to 64 Xeon cores *today* in IBM's X3 line, up to > > 32 Xeon cores @ > > > from Unisys, up to 8 Xeon cores from HP.  Up to 16 Opteron > > cores *today* > > > > from Sun, up to 8 Opteron cores from HP and IBM).  Large > > enough in the H > > > case of Xeon for all but the very small niche of those whose needs= > > > exceed 64-core systems (and they'll be able to get more  > > from x86-64 next> > > > year, when Opteron will start supporting 32-core systems > > effectively;4 > > > IBM's X3 systems may actually support 128-core > > configurations as early ; > > > as the end of this year if Intel ships quad-core Xeon  > > modules by then), ; > > > and reliable enough for just about anyone who doesn't  > > require *real*4 > > > fault-tolerant redundantly-executing hardware. > > >  > > > End Bill quote.  > > I > > What part of offering up evidence to support the *range* of tasks for E > > which x86 can provide 'viable solutions' do you find difficult to E > > understand, Kerry?  Especially in response to someone so prone to > > > harping on the importance of 'server consolidation' and to > > attempting to . > > dismiss x86 systems as strictly 'low-end'? > >  > A > Bill, your getting to predictable. I am trying to move on here.  > I > Ok, say you have a great x86-64 with 96 cpus. Given the one server, one A > app culture with Windows and Linux, what OS will you run on it?  >   B You have as much choice for x86-64 as you do for Itanium. Windows, Linux and Solaris x86.  A Most people would be unhappy running Windows or Linux on a single < partition 64-96 way system be it based on Itanium or X86-64.  < You also won't get much mileage in an argument that HP-UX isC significantly more scalable than Solaris for the applications which ' require one very large single instance.   ? So the reality is thatr x86-64 has pretty much the same options 2 available to it as Itanium from an OS perspective.  H > Yes, you can partition it into many smaller ones, but is that the bestG > use of a high end system? You also need an OS license with all of the 8 > managing software licences for each partition as well. >   G Depends on how many smaller partitions. Most big Sun servers that I was A involved in deploying generally didn't have one very large single B domain/partition etc. instead they were generally sliced up into aF number of quite big partitions with dynamic domains being used to move3 CPU/memory/I/O resources from on domain to another.   F Having left Sun I have been involved in a number of AIX based projectsD using large P Series and the majority of these have been partitioned using LPARS.  C The OS licensing issue is all dependent on the OS in question, some C will require additional licenses some will not and the variation in 4 mileage is the same for x86-64 as it is for Itanium.  I > And for those sticking with Solaris, they are staying with SPARC on the  > high end.   G Mostly, some are migrating from Linux to Solaris x86 at the low end and E keeping the big iron servers as SPARC boxes. Some are re-investing in F low end SPARC based Sun's particularly the T1000/T2000 T1 based boxes. > B > > It's a matter of anticipating your all-too-predictable FUD andF > > deflecting it in advance (in part because it becomes pretty boring; > > responding to it after the fact time, after time, after  > > time).  x86-64A > > systems may extend considerably farther into the low-end than  > > Itanic and? > > the other proprietary (mostly RISC) platforms do (which is,  > > of course,F > > to x86's credit in terms of offering true 'desktop to data center'I > > coverage) but now cover all of the mid-range and most of the high-end ; > > ground that Itanic does - both in terms of hardware and  > > software (Linux > > > and, especially, Solaris offering credible alternatives to > > proprietary I > > mid-range-to-high-end Unix - and, according to the article you cited, # > > VMS and OS/400 - environments).  > > @ > > Making x86 solutions extremely attractive for people looking
 > > to reduce 8 > > the number of platforms they use and consolidate the > > expertise requiredG > > to support them - especially those installations whose needs do not G > > *currently* extend beyond the 8- to 16-core range (because multiple > > > tier-1 vendors offer both Xeon and Opteron servers in that > > range *today* A > > and their core counts will double well within a year with the 
 > > influx of ? > > the quad-core parts on the near horizon - even if we try to  > > dismiss the G > > larger IBM and Unisys Xeon systems available *today* as being niche  > > products). > > H > > Of course, if *you* are willing to stop harping on consolidation and> > > scalability as allegedly unmatchable Itanic strengths then > > *I* will be D > > more than happy to stop pointing out x86-64's ability to compete, > > head-to-head with Itanic in these areas. > > 
 > > - bill > >  >  >  > Time to move on. > J > You think Windows and Linux will offer good consolidation solutions just! > because they can run on x86-64.  > H > I think these are limited by one-app, one server culture and a host of > other reasons.  D You seem to have missed Xen/VMWARE/Solaris Zones out of the picture.B VMWARE and Zones have become very popular choices for a lot of our> customers so much so that we do specific engineering for both.  @ They crack the consolidation/resource management problem in veryC different ways but they both allow x86-64 platforms to host a large ; number of consolidated applications on one physical server.    Regards  Andrew Harrison  > % > Agree to disagree. Time to move on.  > 	 > Regards  >  > Kerry Main > Senior Consultant  > HP Services Canada > Voice: 613-592-4660  > Fax: 613-591-4477  > kerryDOTmainAThpDOTcom > (remove the DOT's and AT)  > 6 > OpenVMS - the secure, multi-site OS that just works.   ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 10:23:54 -0500 + From: brandon@dalsemi.com (BRANDON, JOHN M) % Subject: HSG80 CACHE UPGRADE question 1 Message-ID: <06091510235475@dscis6-0.dalsemi.com>   N I have an HSG80 controller (pair) with 256-MB (each) and would like to upgrade to the max of 512-MB (each).  F Is it possible to upgrade the controllers online by shutting down one,M installing the cache, starting that one back up and shutting down the other?    4 Or do I need to shutdown the entire controller pair?   TIA      John "REBOOT" Brandon  VMS Systems Administrator * firstname.lastname.spam.me.not@dalsemi.com   ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 06:42:50 -0400 - From: bradhamilton <bradhamilton@comcast.net> Y Subject: Re: Mozilla Thunderbird with VMS (was:Re: VMS MAIL: Will it ever join the 21st c * Message-ID: <450A83AA.7040007@comcast.net>   Tom Linden wrote: 5 > On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 20:07:49 -0700, Craig A. Berry  ( > <craigberry@mac.com.spamfooler> wrote: > / >> In article <J6oOg.37915$_q4.698@dukeread09>, ( >>  Arne Vajhj <arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote: >> >>> Ian Miller wrote:  >>> > bradhamilton wrote: H >>> >> I've asked before, but I'll ask again - will Firefox/Thunderbird  >>> replace $ >>> >> Mozilla on VMS in the future? [...] H > What is the point?  VMS is better suited as the web server, there are  > plenty > of good clients out there   F One could keep one's mail "database" on a reliable system with little G downtime, and relatively invulnerable from virii and worms.  You would  I need to use something like Sophos to avoid passing on such vermin, but I  % can see some advantages, in any case.   A For me, Mozilla seems to be quite a pig on VMS; my hope was that  L Firefox/Thunderbird would be less resource-intensive.  Perhaps I'm mistaken.   ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 08:26:37 -0600 + From: Mark Berryman <mark@theberrymans.com> Y Subject: Re: Mozilla Thunderbird with VMS (was:Re: VMS MAIL: Will it ever join the 21st c % Message-ID: <450a55cd$1@mvb.saic.com>    Craig A. Berry wrote: . > In article <J6oOg.37915$_q4.698@dukeread09>,' >  Arne Vajhj <arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote:  >  >> Ian Miller wrote: >>> bradhamilton wrote: M >>>> I've asked before, but I'll ask again - will Firefox/Thunderbird replace " >>>> Mozilla on VMS in the future?8 >>> Only if someone does the port. Are you volenteering?< >> Considering  and that FireFox is ported to several Unixes8 >> and that Mozilla was ported to VMS, then should it be >> that difficult ?  > I > I think there was some issue like Firefox needs a newer version of GTK  I > than is available on VMS, so there would be an effort to update a core  3 > library first before the port itself could begin.   P I don't believe that is the case.  I recently completed a "successful build" of P Firefox.  When I get a chance, I'll go back in and find out why it hangs when I P run it.  In other words, while I probably did something wrong in the build, all 4 of the necessary libraries were, in fact, available.  
 Mark Berryman    ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:44:43 -0500 + From: brandon@dalsemi.com (BRANDON, JOHN M) & Subject: Re: MP Synchronization ISSUES1 Message-ID: <06091512444310@dscis6-0.dalsemi.com>   0 I was looking at the version of VMS on the ES40.  8 According to HP web site, the ES40 is spec'd for V7.2-2.  # The version I am running is V7.2-1.   H Could this be a potential suspect for the MP synch problems I am having?         John "REBOOT" Brandon  VMS Systems Administrator * firstname.lastname.spam.me.not@dalsemi.com   ------------------------------    Date: 15 Sep 2006 09:00:11 -0700, From: "Ingi" <rocketiii.scientist@gmail.com>0 Subject: Netbeans IDE$SERVER connection problemsB Message-ID: <1158336011.853859.178420@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>   Hi  G I'm trying to connect Netbeans IDE 5.5 Beta 2 to the IDE$SERVER running 2 on OpenVMS 8.2/ALPHA but the connection times out.  G I defined the IDE$VERBOSE_LOG so this is what I get (for one connection ! try) into ide$logs:ide$server.log   C 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PM CEST:login process for the user:isiz started 4 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PM CEST:user:isiz:thread started* 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PM CEST:getResourceID:' 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PM CEST:status!2280 < 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PM CEST:user process cache:checkIfUnique2 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PM CEST:create:IDE$USER_MOOWXK, 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PM CEST:channel:613424962 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PM CEST:assign:IDE$USER_MOOWXK= 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PM CEST:assign:resnameStr:IDE$USER_MOOWXK > 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PM CEST:server thread startIDE$USER_MOOWXK' 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PM CEST:DLC file to ( execute:ide$scratch:distnb_user45451tmp.< 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PM CEST:Changing owner and protection of  ide$scratch:distnb_user45451tmp.& 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PM CEST:pid:243263, 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PM CEST:setPortImpl:1099# 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PM CEST:getEFN: . 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PM CEST:setPortImpl:efn:62& 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PM CEST:freeEFN:62 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PMa CEST:setSecurityContextImpl:org.netbeans.modules.distributed.rmi.impl.SecurityContextImpl@837c832 # 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PM CEST:getEFN: 9 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PM CEST:setSecurityContextImpl:efn:62 & 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PM CEST:freeEFN:62@ 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PM CEST:user:isiz:waiting for server startup: 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PM CEST:number of seconds to wait :120 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PMD CEST:java.rmi.NotBoundException:rmi://localhost:1099/IDE$USER_MOOWXKG 2006/09/15 17:08:22 PM CEST::waiting for server startup:IDE$USER_MOOWXK  2006/09/15 17:08:23 PMD CEST:java.rmi.NotBoundException:rmi://localhost:1099/IDE$USER_MOOWXKG 2006/09/15 17:08:23 PM CEST::waiting for server startup:IDE$USER_MOOWXK  2006/09/15 17:08:24 PMD CEST:java.rmi.NotBoundException:rmi://localhost:1099/IDE$USER_MOOWXKG 2006/09/15 17:08:24 PM CEST::waiting for server startup:IDE$USER_MOOWXK  2006/09/15 17:08:25 PMD CEST:java.rmi.NotBoundException:rmi://localhost:1099/IDE$USER_MOOWXKG 2006/09/15 17:08:25 PM CEST::waiting for server startup:IDE$USER_MOOWXK  2006/09/15 17:08:26 PMD CEST:java.rmi.NotBoundException:rmi://localhost:1099/IDE$USER_MOOWXKG 2006/09/15 17:08:26 PM CEST::waiting for server startup:IDE$USER_MOOWXK  2006/09/15 17:08:27 PMD CEST:java.rmi.NotBoundException:rmi://localhost:1099/IDE$USER_MOOWXKG 2006/09/15 17:08:27 PM CEST::waiting for server startup:IDE$USER_MOOWXK  2006/09/15 17:08:28 PMD CEST:java.rmi.NotBoundException:rmi://localhost:1099/IDE$USER_MOOWXKG 2006/09/15 17:08:28 PM CEST::waiting for server startup:IDE$USER_MOOWXK  2006/09/15 17:08:29 PMD CEST:java.rmi.NotBoundException:rmi://localhost:1099/IDE$USER_MOOWXKG 2006/09/15 17:08:29 PM CEST::waiting for server startup:IDE$USER_MOOWXK  2006/09/15 17:08:30 PMD CEST:java.rmi.NotBoundException:rmi://localhost:1099/IDE$USER_MOOWXKG 2006/09/15 17:08:30 PM CEST::waiting for server startup:IDE$USER_MOOWXK  2006/09/15 17:08:31 PMD CEST:java.rmi.NotBoundException:rmi://localhost:1099/IDE$USER_MOOWXKG 2006/09/15 17:08:31 PM CEST::waiting for server startup:IDE$USER_MOOWXK 4 2006/09/15 17:08:32 PM CEST:checking on user servers 2006/09/15 17:08:32 PMD CEST:java.rmi.NotBoundException:rmi://localhost:1099/IDE$USER_MOOWXKG 2006/09/15 17:08:32 PM CEST::waiting for server startup:IDE$USER_MOOWXK E 2006/09/15 17:08:34 PM CEST:user process cache:adding(userName:isiz:#  of SecurityContext 1) 5 2006/09/15 17:08:34 PM CEST:connected:IDE$USER_MOOWXK 4 2006/09/15 17:09:32 PM CEST:checking on user serversD 2006/09/15 17:09:48 PM CEST:Connection refused to host: 192.168.0.1; nested exception is:7         java.net.ConnectException: connection timed out % 2006/09/15 17:09:48 PM CEST:deassign: ' 2006/09/15 17:09:48 PM CEST:destroyMbx: 5 2006/09/15 17:09:48 PM CEST:user:isiz:thread finished 5 2006/09/15 17:10:46 PM CEST:unbinding IDE$USER_MOOWXK > 2006/09/15 17:10:46 PM CEST:stopProcess:IDE$USER_MOOWXK:2432634 2006/09/15 17:11:46 PM CEST:checking on user serversA 2006/09/15 17:11:46 PM CEST:isProcessAlive:IDE$USER_MOOWXK:243263 - 2006/09/15 17:11:46 PM CEST:error status!2280 5 2006/09/15 17:11:46 PM CEST:unbinding IDE$USER_MOOWXK + 2006/09/15 17:11:47 PM CEST:IDE$USER_MOOWXK ( 2006/09/15 17:11:47 PM CEST:user process" cache:removing(sc:IDE$USER_MOOWXK)5 2006/09/15 17:11:47 PM CEST:unbinding IDE$USER_MOOWXK + 2006/09/15 17:11:47 PM CEST:IDE$USER_MOOWXK > 2006/09/15 17:11:47 PM CEST:stopProcess:IDE$USER_MOOWXK:243263- 2006/09/15 17:11:47 PM CEST:error status!2280     0 The Remote server diagnostics reveals following:  Remote Server Diagnostics Report! =================================   Distributed NetBeans Client Info  --------------------------------B org.netbeans.modules.distributed                    5.0.10	enabled     NetBeans Environment --------------------: Product version	NetBeans Platform Dev (Build 200607190830) OS info:	Windows XP 5.1 x86 : JDK Info:	1.5.0_06 Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 1.5.0_06-b05E                 Sun Microsystems Inc. C:\Program\Java\jdk1.5.0_06\jre ( Home dir:	C:\Documents and Settings\ISIZ) Current dir:	C:\Program\netbeans-5.5beta2 5 NetBeans home:	C:\Program\netbeans-5.5beta2\platform6 ; User dir:	C:\Documents and Settings\ISIZ\.netbeans\5.5beta2      Remote Connection Tests  ----------------------- B Server Name/IP Address                              <somenodename>8 OpenVMS Username                                    isiz8 Server host Connectivity                            PASS8 IDE$SERVER Availability                             PASS!         Server version is T5.0-01 8 User Authentication                                 PASS8 Quota Checks                                        PASS    & Default device is DISK$<somediskname>: Default directory is [ISIZ]          User Login Environment ----------------------  8 JDK Setup                                           PASS8 JVM Logical Redefinition                            PASS8 RMI Port Redefinition                               PASS8 Verbose Log Enabled                                 PASS8 F$MODE() Test                                       PASS8 ODS_5 Check                                         FAIL8 Process Privs Check                                 PASS8 IDE$SERVER Process Running                          PASS8 FTP Service Started                                 PASS8 SMB Server Started                                  FAIL8 PWIP Service Started                                FAIL8 BASH Command Defined                                FAIL  ) I'm not dependent upon the FAILing steps.    The Java version on OpenVMS is:  java version "1.4.2"0 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard EditionD Classic VM (build 1.4.2-4.p2, 05/09/2005-10:05, native threads, jit)  C I've also defined the IDE$HOST_IPNAME to the ip-address of the host : were the IDE$SERVER is running, but with the same results.  A I did follow the installation instructions and changed the quotas - accordingly for the user I'm connecting with.   G Does anyone have a clue on what to change to make this thingy working ?    Regards  - Ingi   ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:51:42 -0500 + From: "Forster, Michael" <mforster@mcw.edu> . Subject: Question re VMS732_UPDATE-V0800 patchJ Message-ID: <EEE1E47094AB7C4DA2868E679EA488F80BF90CB4@MCWMAIL.mcwcorp.net>   Hi all,  =20 ? Should VMS732_UPDATE-V0800 patch include TZ-200 but not include B ACRTL-300 when TZ-200 has a mandatory kit dependency of ACRTL-300?  E I'm going to apply ACRTL-300 before the update patch since I want the E ACRTL patch, however this would affect those who don't need the patch  and wouldn't apply it?   Cheers,    michael    ------------------------------    Date: 15 Sep 2006 06:11:20 -0700$ From: "AEF" <spamsink2001@yahoo.com>' Subject: System won't self-test or boot A Message-ID: <1158325880.622439.6240@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>    Hi,   D I have a MicroVAX 3100 Model 95 overseas in London that just stoppedD working. Fortunately this happened during non-production hours and IC had plenty of time to switch to the backup system. Also, daily data F files were successfully copied to another system, so no data was lost.C So this is not an urgent problem. (I have yet another backup system   ready in case of more problems.)   I got an alarm from Spectrum:   F Device XXXXXX of type GnSNMPDev has stopped responding to polls and/or external requests.  C My cohort in London said there was zero response on the console. No F prompt. Nothing. He "rebooted". I assume he meant power-cycled. Still,G nothing. No prompt, no self-tests. He hooked it up to a terminal server D that I then connected to. He power-cycled it again. Nothing. I askedA him to press the Halt button. Still, zilch. He also said that the . lights were lit, so it's not the power supply.  C I had a terminal session open on my PC overnight when this happened , with REPLY/ENABLE active. Nothing from that.  G The system is in a cage, so there was no cleaning person to knock it or  other similar scenarios.  ; Does anyone here have a guess as to what happened or make a A recommendation? I am waiting for him to move the system disk to a E working system so I can look for clues, but he has been too busy with  other stuff so far.   @ The system is connected to a Storage Works tower where its disks$ reside. It was running VAX/VMS v6.1.  C As an aside: How can I tell when any particular MicroVAX was built?    Thanks for your time.    AEF    ------------------------------    Date: 15 Sep 2006 06:42:14 -0700  From: "Ian Miller" <ijm@uk2.net>+ Subject: Re: System won't self-test or boot C Message-ID: <1158327734.259535.237240@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>   D some models of MicroVAX have a row of diagnostic lights on the back.   ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 17:10:13 +0200 / From: Paul Sture <paul.sture.nospam@hispeed.ch> + Subject: Re: System won't self-test or boot J Message-ID: <paul.sture.nospam-43D15E.17101315092006@mac.sture.homeip.net>  A In article <1158325880.622439.6240@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>, &  "AEF" <spamsink2001@yahoo.com> wrote:  F > I have a MicroVAX 3100 Model 95 overseas in London that just stopped
 > working.  G Is there a LED display on this system? That can determine what is dead.    > E > As an aside: How can I tell when any particular MicroVAX was built?  >   8 From the comp.os.vms thread at http://tinyurl.com/hpxk9   
 > NI63900016   > A > The leading 6 stands for 1996 and the 39 is the 39th work week. ! > Thats when it was manufactured.    --  
 Paul Sture   ------------------------------  % Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:49:25 -0400 3 From: "Richard B. Gilbert" <rgilbert88@comcast.net> + Subject: Re: System won't self-test or boot : Message-ID: <PN6dnTACl94HRJfYnZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d@comcast.com>  
 AEF wrote:   > Hi,  > F > I have a MicroVAX 3100 Model 95 overseas in London that just stoppedF > working. Fortunately this happened during non-production hours and IE > had plenty of time to switch to the backup system. Also, daily data H > files were successfully copied to another system, so no data was lost.E > So this is not an urgent problem. (I have yet another backup system " > ready in case of more problems.) >  > I got an alarm from Spectrum:  > H > Device XXXXXX of type GnSNMPDev has stopped responding to polls and/or > external requests. > E > My cohort in London said there was zero response on the console. No H > prompt. Nothing. He "rebooted". I assume he meant power-cycled. Still,I > nothing. No prompt, no self-tests. He hooked it up to a terminal server F > that I then connected to. He power-cycled it again. Nothing. I askedC > him to press the Halt button. Still, zilch. He also said that the 0 > lights were lit, so it's not the power supply. > E > I had a terminal session open on my PC overnight when this happened . > with REPLY/ENABLE active. Nothing from that. > I > The system is in a cage, so there was no cleaning person to knock it or  > other similar scenarios. > = > Does anyone here have a guess as to what happened or make a  > recommendation?  <snip>  H Recommendation: throw it away.  Alternate recommendation: log a service H call with HP.  (Note that it's probably far cheaper to shop for another H one on e-Bay.)  If there is someone technically inclined in your London ; shop, you might want to save it as a source of spare parts.    ------------------------------   End of INFO-VAX 2006.507 ************************